Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Logpoint comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
1.0
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response improves incident response time, reduces breaches, and enhances threat visibility with efficient deployment and accurate detection.
Sentiment score
6.7
Logpoint ensures compliance, cost predictability, and security, offering 40% ROI and fulfilling Department of Defense contract needs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.8
Kaspersky's customer service receives mixed reviews, with premium support praised for speed and standard support criticized for delays.
Sentiment score
7.3
Logpoint's customer service is improving, but response times and communication barriers lead to varied user experiences worldwide.
Logpoint's customer support is not sufficient with only one engineer in the US.
Cyber Security Analyst at Pacific Propeller
The technical support for Logpoint is very good, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
I recommend a submission to Logpoint because I worked with it before.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
4.9
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is praised for scalability, especially in large enterprises, with some limitations in non-cloud versions.
Sentiment score
7.2
LogPoint's modular design ensures effective scalability across enterprise environments, integrating seamlessly and handling growth efficiently with high user ratings.
It is web-based and accommodates the expansion of our organization.
Cyber Security Analyst at Pacific Propeller
Logpoint is scalable and capable of expanding.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
5.8
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is stable, with strong reliability, despite some connectivity issues and license update challenges.
Sentiment score
6.4
Logpoint offers stable performance on adequate hardware but faces issues with limited resources, occasional bugs, and diverse log handling.
I have received reports indicating glitches and downtimes with Logpoint.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response faces issues with compatibility, usability, and integration, needing enhancements in performance, support, and features.
Logpoint faces challenges in integration, user experience, and support, requiring improvements in detection, deployment, and interface customization.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response stops certain things. However, it does not take me to the file, and it is not user-friendly.
IT Manager at R K Khanna and Associates
Dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
Cyber Security Analyst at Pacific Propeller
Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
 

Setup Cost

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response pricing is seen as competitive, justified by its effectiveness despite some perceiving it as high.
Logpoint offers affordable, transparent pricing with fixed and subscription options, remaining competitive compared to other SIEM solutions.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is cheap.
IT Manager at R K Khanna and Associates
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
 

Valuable Features

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response offers comprehensive features for efficient, accurate threat management and security across networks.
Logpoint excels with advanced logging, user-friendly interface, cost-effective pricing, and integrates UEBA and SOAR in one package.
For individual machines, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response sits to check the endpoint.
IT Manager at R K Khanna and Associates
The UEBA enables us to monitor at the device level, and SOAR provides playbooks and templates that we can modify and incorporate into the platform.
Cyber Security Analyst at Pacific Propeller
Exabeam's advantage is its AI-driven network AI; this AI feature is available, and Exabeam is powerful.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
It effectively facilitates logging and log storage and assists in security event management by ingesting security events.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
23rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Logpoint
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
35th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (29th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (26th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (14th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logpoint is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response1.0%
Logpoint0.4%
Other98.6%
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Manikumar David - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at R K Khanna and Associates
Experienced weak security checks and increased system load with limited control
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is not up to the mark compared to what I have seen from earlier products. I was using CrowdStrike, and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is not up to the mark compared to CrowdStrike and other products. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response sometimes seems to allow certain files which should not be allowed on its own. I trust Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response to check the files, but I cannot sit and check all the files that are coming in. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response has its own weaknesses. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response slows the system slightly. It uses more resources than what CrowdStrike does. When any attack happens or something is happening with other products I am using, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response stops certain things. However, it does not take me to the file, and it is not user-friendly.
Rifat Hasan - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
Has lacked proper integration and consistent support communication
I selected Logpoint for the pricing as it is reasonable. I am located in Bangladesh, South Asia, Dhaka. I have tried to contact Exabeam by mail repeatedly, but there has been no response. My company, Corporate Projukti Limited, including my Bangladesh area head, technical director, and team manager, have sent emails to contact Exabeam solution, but there is no response. There is already a distributor in Bangladesh. The weakness with Logpoint is UEBA. UEBA is recommended, but not extra. Exabeam's UEBA is an extra feature. SOAR is extra, but Logpoint's product measurement is 40 or 50. There is a 10% difference with the UEBA and SOAR, so Logpoint is weak there. I would appreciate extra features in Logpoint such as SOAR. SOAR and UEBA are included features in Logpoint. Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation. Exabeam has a license included, and the extra license is an add-on. In Logpoint, it is included, which makes it a weak point.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
6%
Computer Software Company
24%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?
Kaspersky EDR offers automated response capabilities, enhancing efficiency by enabling quick investigation and response to potential threats on Android devices.
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is not up to the mark compared to what I have seen from earlier products. I was using CrowdStrike, and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is not up ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
What needs improvement with LogPoint?
I selected Logpoint for the pricing as it is reasonable. I am located in Bangladesh, South Asia, Dhaka. I have tried to contact Exabeam by mail repeatedly, but there has been no response. My compan...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Logpoint and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.