Kaseya Traverse vs Kentik comparison

Read 16 Kentik reviews

6,957 Views
6,122 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Kentik and Kaseya Traverse compete in the network monitoring and management category. Kentik may hold the upper hand due to its real-time visibility and user-friendly customer service.

Features: Kentik offers a SaaS solution that eliminates server maintenance needs, provides robust NetFlow visualization tools, and supports real-time visibility and flow analysis. Its Data Explorer grants users access to comprehensive data, aiding in planning, security, and troubleshooting. Users highlight the customization options in reports and dashboards, enhancing adaptability. Kaseya Traverse covers networks, servers, and applications, offering remote support and data collection. Its features include diverse device monitoring and integration across different IT stacks, providing a clear view of IT infrastructure.

Room for Improvement: Kentik could improve by offering more granular user access controls and better dimension ordering. Users find the alerting and reporting tools complex and desire more actionable insights. Kaseya Traverse struggles with reporting and integration challenges and would benefit from advanced features like a CMDB. Improvements could be made by incorporating AI capabilities and enhancing service reliability and technical support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kentik's SaaS deployment relieves maintenance burdens and its outstanding technical support receives high praise. Kaseya Traverse supports various deployment environments, including hybrid cloud and on-premises setups, but experiences with its technical support and reliability are mixed.

Pricing and ROI: Kentik's pricing is perceived as high, but the data insights and network optimization benefits justify the cost, resulting in significant ROI. It offers efficiency and operational improvements. Kaseya Traverse is known for competitive pricing with a flexible licensing model but has high total costs. ROI varies based on implementation, with some users finding it cost-effective compared to competitors.

To learn more, read our detailed Kaseya Traverse vs. Kentik Report (Updated: June 2026).

Kaseya Traverse vs. Kentik

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

77th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (50th)

Kentik

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

22nd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kentik is 1.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kentik	1.8%
Kaseya Traverse	0.6%
Other	97.6%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

ADRIANA SALDARRIAGA TOBON

Sales Manager at IFX NEtworks

Client experience and cybersecurity have improved with an easy setup

The solution is valuable for client experience, especially in the financial sector. The most important feature is cybersecurity. The pricing is good, but the functionality is the most important aspect for clients. The solution is easy to deploy and requires only one person to set up, making it easy and quick. Overall, the ease of use and the fact that it meets client expectations are major positives.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"In terms of most valuable features, we are happy with everything so far, and maybe in a year's time I'll have a different opinion on what can change, what can be better, but for now it's the perfect solution."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

"Before using the solution, we had to do all these manual tasks, such as running all these queries manually, and building our tech cost-report used to be a two or two-and-a-half-week effort, and using Kentik, and the automation that it provides us, we've brought that down to a day or two, which is a massive time savings."

"Kentik excels in telemetry within data centers and works well in multi-vendor environments."

"We're also using Kentik to ingest metrics. It's a useful feature, and its response time, whenever we're pulling back the data, is higher than our on-prem solution."

"It offers a simple yet powerful feature of classifying applications, going beyond basic statistics."

"In terms of overall vendor partnership, I'd give Kentik a nine out of 10; they're right up there as one of my best partners to work with, amongst all the contracts that I own, and they're very customer-centric, always available, with nothing too small or too big that I can't ask them to help with, and they seem to be willing and able to jump in no matter what."

"Honestly, it is one of those products that I would suggest to almost any network operator."

"One of the valuable features is the intuitive nature of building out reports, and then triggering actions based on specific metrics from those reports. It has a really good UI and the ability to surface data through the reporting functions is pretty good. That's helped a lot in the security space."

"The biggest thing Kentik has given us is the amount of visibility we have into our own network now and knowing what's going on at a given time."

More Kentik pros

Cons

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"With my most recent experiences on the solution, I can say that it isn't currently stable; there are a lot of glitches and bugs and the reliability just isn't there right now."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

"The only downside to Kentik, something that I don't like, is that it's great that it shows you where these anomalies lie, but it's not actionable. Kentik is valuable, don't get me wrong, but if it had an actionable piece to it..."

"We asked for a way, regarding the potential networks that exist, to hook Kentik up with external tools like peering DBs to correlate things together and see what we can do... This is all in the [next] beta now."

"There is a large difference between BGP and normal nodes. I don't think this plays out to the best for the customer or Kentik."

"The product could strive for more improvements to become closer to perfect."

"I would like to see more granular user and security rights."

"I consider the pricing model as an area for improvement."

"It also detects anomalies proactively, but the same is not so true when it comes to real network problems, since they tend to just happen."

"I've checked out the V4 version of the interface and it's still a little bit clunky for me to use."

More Kentik cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"We have an annual contract with Kentik that we renew each year for a set number of licenses. We also have some burstable licenses which we can spin up and spin down, and those are paid as they are used."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

What is your primary use case for Kaseya Traverse?

If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that.

What advice do you have for others considering Kaseya Traverse?

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. As Kaseya sellers, we always promote Kaseya first. If the price is more competitive, then I think it will be better. It's a main pain point for us as a resel...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kentik?

I would say Kentik's pricing is not cheap. From my perspective as part of the technical team, I would not categorize it as expensive, but I know it is not cheap.

What needs improvement with Kentik?

There's always room for improvements and better relations when using any kind of product. We faced some issues with Kentik UI and alerting, which we asked them to fix, and they succeeded. They have...

What is your primary use case for Kentik?

We are using Kentik mostly for synthetic tests, and from one last year, network monitoring as well. We are using it for inter DC BGP tests and server monitoring as well.

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Comparisons

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 5% of the time

AcuVigill Dashboard vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 5% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

DX Spectrum vs Kentik

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Kentik

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

More Kentik Competitors

Product Reports

Kaseya Traverse

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Download Kentik product report

Overview

Kaseya Traverse offers sustainable functionality for comprehensive network, server, and application monitoring. It supports full IT stack visibility with strong processing capabilities and an intuitive interface.

Designed for businesses needing robust remote monitoring, Kaseya Traverse handles networks, servers, and applications with ease. It ensures comprehensive management with features like automated workflows, effective troubleshooting, remote support, and detailed inventory reporting. Despite user concerns about development speed in reporting and support, absence of a CMDB, and integration issues, it remains a popular choice for managed service providers. Utilized primarily for remote maintenance, patch updates, and antivirus management, it connects customer endpoints to manage infrastructure efficiently.

What are the key features of Kaseya Traverse?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports network, server, and application oversight.
Robust Processing: Manages multiple devices and infrastructures seamlessly.
Automation Workflows: Simplifies management tasks and improves efficiency.
Remote Support: Offers effective tools for troubleshooting and assistance.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures easy navigation and accessibility.

What benefits should users expect from Kaseya Traverse?

Increased Efficiency: Automation and remote capabilities streamline processes.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides a complete view of IT infrastructure.
Improved Troubleshooting: Quick identification and resolution of issues.
Cost Management: Despite pricing concerns, it supports competitive offerings.

Managed service providers leverage Kaseya Traverse for monitoring data centers and cloud environments across industries. It's particularly effective in networking, storage, and server management for enterprises, offering configuration assistance and link monitoring to optimize operations.

Kaseya

Kentik provides real-time visibility into network infrastructure, focusing on monitoring, data visualization, and flow analysis to manage traffic patterns efficiently.

With robust analytics capabilities, Kentik offers insights into BGP peering status, aids in DDoS detection, and allows for detailed telemetry through its intuitive interface. The platform's SaaS nature simplifies operations by eliminating server maintenance concerns. Multi-vendor support and synthetic testing enhance network security and performance by simulating customer scenarios, while its API offers automation for querying and reporting tasks.

What are the key features of Kentik?

Real-Time Visibility: Monitors network infrastructure effectively.
Data Visualization: Offers powerful tools for viewing complex data.
Flow Analysis: Analyzes traffic flow for optimal management.
BGP Peering Insights: Provides in-depth peering status checks.
DDoS Alerting: Notifies about potential DDoS threats.
Data Explorer: Aids in understanding traffic patterns.
Synthetic Testing: Simulates scenarios to enhance security and performance.

What benefits can be found in user reviews?

Automation: Users value the flexibility of its API for automating tasks.
Ease of Use: SaaS model streamlines user engagement, eliminating server maintenance.
Flexibility: Report customization and query settings are highly appreciated.
Enhanced Observability: Telemetry and multi-vendor support increase oversight.

Industries implement Kentik for network monitoring, traffic management, and flow data analysis across both on-prem and cloud setups. It proves valuable for detecting DDoS events, managing peering relationships, and optimizing costs, besides managing CDN configurations and performing synthetic tests in diverse environments.

Sample Customers

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Pandora, Yelp, Neustar, Box, University of Washington, Zoom, Tata, and Cogent.

Kaseya Traverse vs. Kentik