Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Broadcom and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #73, while Kaseya is ranked #59 with an average rating of 8.0. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.
DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews
  • 1,862 Views
  • 987 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Kaseya Traverse
Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews
  • 617 Views
  • 506 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Kaseya Traverse compete in the IT infrastructure monitoring category. DX Unified Infrastructure Management appears to have the upper hand with its comprehensive probe catalog and modular licensing model.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is known for its extensive range of probes, ease of scalability across global monitoring ecosystems, and stability with a smaller server footprint, avoiding Java technology. Kaseya Traverse is effective in service monitoring with competitive pricing, presenting simpler pricing with all features included without extra cost. It also offers hybrid cloud environment flexibility.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management could improve customer support beyond the initial level, streamline VMware monitoring for better scalability and filtering, and optimize overall support quality. Kaseya Traverse should address the absence of CMDB, enhance reporting functionalities, and improve integration abilities to manage noise from false positives better.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers on-premises and public cloud configurations, but post-sale support needs improvement. Kaseya Traverse provides deployment in both on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, receiving balanced feedback for support while needing enhancements in deeper integration and AI capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management, despite being expensive, offers robust features and a modular licensing model, providing significant long-term ROI. Kaseya Traverse is competitively priced with all features included in the base price, offering a cost-effective solution relative to its functionality.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Kaseya Traverse
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
73rd
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
38th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (22nd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (50th), AIOps (25th)
Kaseya Traverse
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
59th
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
32nd
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Kaseya Traverse0.3%
DX Unified Infrastructure Management0.5%
Other99.2%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Mark Tukh - PeerSpot reviewer
Great scalability, versatility, infrastructure coverage and ease of implementation
I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. The number of people needed for deployment depends on the customer, but we usually need at least one person and two to three at other times. The initial implementation takes about two months. The full implementation can be infinite because you may want to implement more. The product does not require a lot of maintenance. To increase the implementation, we push additional services in the first and second years to make it more robust and fully implemented. We usually sell to big enterprises. It can also be affordable for smaller enterprises, but we don't work with them a lot. We have from 2,000 to 10,000 workers. So the product itself can have five, ten or even 20 users.
Read full review
AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive
Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Another division handed us the opportunity to monitor their solutions as written, and UIM was very useful for that."
"Monitors the infrastructure asset and also monitors as an IT service."
"The ability to monitor any platform. We have Windows, Linux, AIX, and mainframe all being monitored with the same UIM infrastructure."
"It gives an alarm when there's something going on, not just when there's an expected spike that happens every night on a server."
"I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution."
"It is easy to implement but requires good planning."
"The benefit is easy installation. Thus, the model approach of the product and out-of-the-box probes, which deliver direct value."
"You can scale it pretty much however way you want to as long as you have the servers to throw at it."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros
"The remote support and data collection features are great."
"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."
"It's a simple and humble tool."
"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."
"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."
"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."
"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."
"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."
More Kaseya Traverse pros
 

Cons

"There is also room for improvement in the reporting. It is not really good enough, according to our customers. So what we now usually do is use Power BI to get them the kinds of reports they want."
"They need to continue to advance the filter capabilities, and provide more input fields."
"In the UMP, certain devices will show up multiple times and they don't correlate correctly. That's one of the issues."
"Stability."
"I'm very happy with DX Unified Infrastructure Management, but what could be improved is its user interface because currently, it has many wide spaces. All the information you need is in DX Unified Infrastructure Management, and it's a reliable tool, and though that's more important than the gaps in the user interface being smaller or wider, those gaps still need some improvement. I know the team is working on it. My company had some backend problems with DX Unified Infrastructure Management in the past that have now been solved. The setup for the tool also needs improvement because it's complex. Another room for improvement in DX Unified Infrastructure Management is its technical support because it's sometimes not as knowledgeable or responsive. What I'm suggesting to be added to the tool is an open-standard ELK Elastic-based database where you can put in all data, so that you can use the data in other systems as well."
"The company has not kept pace with developments."
"The other element is that there are no real templates, out of the box. Let's go with an example where we do have the probe, which is great, and we do have a really nuanced customer with a small set of devices that maybe not a lot of other customers use. There might not be a template in place, so effectively we have the tool in front of us but we still need to develop a solution. So it would be really nice to see a little bit more of something like a central repository of templates that we could use. That would help us expedite our onboarding process."
"Customers have expressed that support is not as flexible, and it is difficult to obtain necessary information quickly."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons
"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."
"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."
"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."
"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."
"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."
"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."
"Reporting is a bit difficult."
"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."
More Kaseya Traverse cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."
"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."
"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."
"CAD $400,000 annually."
"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."
"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."
"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."
"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Performing Arts
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
26%
Wholesaler/Distributor
10%
Government
7%
Non Profit
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business29
Midsize Enterprise20
Large Enterprise80
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?
We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?
I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?
The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...
See all answers
What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?
The remote support and data collection features are great.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?
The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?
Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpfu...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Fortra's Network Server Suite vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Fortra's Network Server Suite vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 18% of the time
NetCrunch vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
NetCrunch vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 9% of the time
Ixia Hawkeye vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Ixia Hawkeye vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 6% of the time
SelectStar vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
SelectStar vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 6% of the time
Loom Systems vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Loom Systems vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 6% of the time
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors
PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 58% of the time
Pico Corvil Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
Pico Corvil Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 42% of the time
More Kaseya Traverse Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
October 2025
DX Unified Infrastructure Management reportDownload DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Kaseya Traverse
September 2025
Kaseya Traverse reportDownload Kaseya Traverse product report
 

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager
No data available
 

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya
 

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex
UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Kaseya Traverse
September 2025
Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Kaseya Traverse
Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Kaseya Traverse report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.