We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software."The developers can simplify tasks and each one of them can undertake a task and then they continue with development. Our processes are more efficient and easier for our manager and developers to track them. Their work is more organized."
"Portfolio helps us increase the visibility of projects' status and management with remote workers who make up most of the company."
"The solution has good reporting and is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboard where we can see all of our projects and apply filters to shortlist those projects."
"The workflows are the most valuable feature of the solution, whether for tasks, bugs, or chain requests from the site. I also like the solution's GUI, which is easy to navigate for everyone."
"The solution includes good and fast notifications for other project team members."
"Has good analysis integration capabilities."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"It is a very powerful technology to develop mobile applications or website applications. It is based on Java, which is a very powerful and widely used programming language."
"If you want to generate a report for individual usage, it's difficult."
"I think the solution can improve in graphs and the analysis part."
"The automation in JIRA Portfolio could improve, it takes some time. We have to do some other tactics to have the same integration. Manually integrating something will take more work than if it was automated, but the automation scripting in the solution is not simple."
"Jira has room for improvement in terms of managing various projects and linking requirements centrally under one project. They could include some add-ons that enable you to link all the requirements and put them into a centralized place. That central place should be restricted to a limited set of users with privileges based on user groups with those rights."
"Their interface is a little unique and I think that's partly because the core of the product has morphed into several sub-products, but the underlying architecture has stayed the same on all of them in that it was originally a help desk ticketing system. It's a very tech-focused product and that's fair given its origins, but if they really want to expand their community of users, then they're going to have to move beyond that a little bit and polish it up."
"JIRA Portfolio's configuration management could be improved."
"I think their view needs to be more user friendly. The UI makes it difficult to find things. Secondly, the configuration is very complex. JIRA should help people find out what configuration they are using."
"In the next release, Portfolio should include more metrics and develop their portfolio planning."
"It takes time to download dependencies during deployment. It would be much easier if they can improve it from this aspect."
More LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 47 reviews while LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal is ranked 32nd in Project Management Software. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2, while LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal writes "Powerful technology, open-source, and Java-based". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal is most compared with Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.