JFrog Artifactory vs Make comparison

Read 17 Make reviews

2,493 Views
1,247 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

JFrog Artifactory

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

JFrog Artifactory and Make are two competing tools in the software management and automation category. Based on feature offerings, JFrog Artifactory takes the upper hand in artifact management, while Make stands out in integration and automation flexibility.

Features: JFrog Artifactory excels in artifact management with RTFS, centralized repositories, and CI/CD integration. Make offers a drag-and-drop interface, flexibility in integrations, and low-code AI-powered solutions.

Room for Improvement: JFrog Artifactory could improve its documentation, simplify user management, and enhance monitoring. Make needs to increase speed, optimize the pricing model, and provide better security documentation and UI refinement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JFrog Artifactory supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployments, with strong customer support but complex deployment management. Make is mostly deployed in the cloud, offering easier initial setup but with scalability challenges.

Pricing and ROI: JFrog Artifactory is considered expensive but vital for DevOps processes, with ROI from improved build and dependency management. Make is cost-effective compared to alternatives like Zapier, though pricing model adjustments could enhance alignment with usage.

To learn more, read our detailed JFrog Artifactory vs. Make Report (Updated: April 2026).

JFrog Artifactory vs. Make

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JFrog Artifactory

Ranking in AI Software Development

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Repository Managers (2nd)

Make

Ranking in AI Software Development

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of JFrog Artifactory is 0.5%. The mindshare of Make is 0.7%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Software Development Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Make	0.7%
JFrog Artifactory	0.5%
Other	98.8%

AI Software Development

Featured Reviews

Vinod Bhupathiraju

Development Senior at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Supports a wide variety of packages with robust security features but needs tighter cloud integration

The best features of JFrog Artifactory include the core functionality of package management and software management, along with scanning capabilities to prevent vulnerabilities from being introduced. The metadata management feature was particularly useful for managing packages within JFrog Artifactory. We utilized Xray integration with JFrog Artifactory, which was instrumental in managing vulnerabilities overall. JFrog Artifactory has robust functionality in terms of access control, which helped us ensure minimal access to various artifacts. I would rate it eight out of ten because it is a great product that is widely used in the industry. It has excellent features from an artifact management perspective and maintains good integrations.

Read full review

Farhan Ahmed Sheikh

Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions

Flexibility and efficiency accelerate business processes

Make needs to put some focus on or clarify the security aspect in its documentation or website. When creating automation through these modules between two different applications, there should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make. The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved. The operation consumption is too high and sometimes becomes a burden on the client. Make needs to review its pricing strategy since they have tough competition from n8n. Make sometimes has issues with user logins and data saving when simultaneously working on two different PCs or when two developers are working on something or some blueprint. It can lose saved data from one interface to the other, and when logging on with the same user on another workstation, it occasionally misbehaves. We were unaware that Make had its own local implementation module. They need to advertise this feature more effectively as we are developing many projects in Make and working with various clients.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best features JFrog Artifactory offers are a unified store for our builds, Docker, and everything, and its integration into CI/CD, which is quite smooth for us as we are using it across several different repositories and two different package types including Go and Java Spring Boot."

"The feature that I like is Permission Targets. If I want to give permission to only deploy the cache, I can give that permission to a set of users. Similarly, if I want to overwrite an artifact with the same name from the same pipeline, I can give permission for that as well to particular users."

"Universal package support and custom properties help my team day-to-day by making us more efficient, as we have one tool with which all engineering teams can interact regardless of their team."

"The most valuable feature I have found is the JFrog CLI."

"The core functionality is most valuable for indexing and metadata of all the artifacts, but within the last year or two, we've been using the Projects feature, which has been very helpful. We can now assign individual admins for different projects and repos so that they can self-manage their own user permissions for their data. My IT DevOps team doesn't have to be the facilitators of that. It's now more of a self-service capability for them."

"JFrog Artifactory has positively impacted my organization by centralizing artifact management and improving consistency across builds."

"The most valuable feature is that it is a centralized repository and that you can open multiple repositories for different types of artifacts."

"HPE was using it for a lot of things, and they certainly had a massive implementation."

More JFrog Artifactory pros

"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions."

"Instead of spending several days implementing and testing API integrations inside our FastAPI back end, I was able to build the workflows in a few hours using Make."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by helping me save around 10 plus hours per month to automate reporting and social media posting."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients across hundreds of different platforms, providing the customization capabilities to automate accounting and invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month, and allowing us to build custom churn, retention, and engagement costs that have driven a 30% reduction in churn."

"This means the task that I would complete in a span of one day is completed in a matter of minutes by using Make."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling me to generate numerous leads because it is easy to implement, which allowed me to drastically reduce the time needed to create and present a minimum viable product to clients."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by reducing the number of hours that go into validating and verifying the flow of a particular repetitive process, which would otherwise take multiple hours, to just a few minutes to review for more than 1,000 or 2,000 case scenarios."

"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."

More Make pros

Cons

"The most significant thing that I can express is that upgrading JFrog Artifactory to the new version is a bit cumbersome and it is a tedious process."

"Although JQL is a great tool, I have noticed that JQL queries can be hard to learn."

"We're looking for something that has additional reporting capabilities on data growth and data aging. This goes back to storage lifecycle management so that the actual Artifactory itself can provide these reports to either the administrators or the users. I don't know if it has those capabilities. That's something we have to look into regarding the self-service dashboard, but the tool itself having those capabilities would be great rather than trying to do it at the underlying storage hardware layer."

"It's an enterprise product that acts like an enterprise product. In other words, it's not a product where they focus on user experience."

"JFrog could improve this product with tighter integration capabilities."

"The latest version that I am using is 7.41. It has been upgraded graphics-wise, but there is a bit of slowness. They can improve the graphical interface for the admin jobs and make it faster."

"It's an enterprise product that acts like an enterprise product. In other words, it's not a product where they focus on user experience. I wasn't an administrator, so I primarily worked with the command line tool to upload and download parts of the product. I was not impressed with that because it wasn't well documented. It was challenging to figure out how to get things to work."

"In some of the latest versions of JFrog's SaaS solution, they changed the user interface, the SSO settings, how you interact with them over API, and how you generate tokens. It was very confusing for me. The overall user management is very complicated."

More JFrog Artifactory cons

"Make can be improved in terms of the code module, as sometimes I use it at a developer level, and I want it to be more specific; when using the webhook, some data structures may require a lot of time to organize, so if a code node is available, it would help me structure data effectively."

"Make could be improved by having more platforms and connections that we would like to use, as well as more flexibility in paying for operations, with tasks on a sliding scale instead of by tier."

"Actually, I did not finish this project with Make; I could not manage to finish the full workflow, and I decided to leave it as it is, implementing it a different way because it is very tricky."

"One area that needs improvement is the debugging and monitoring."

"Sometimes the platform is too laggy and loads slowly."

"One area for improvement is an auto-building feature."

"Make has helped me save time positively, but I think there is room for improvement in Make as well."

"I feel that Make can be improved in terms of API handling and integrations."

More Make cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a bit expensive. It could be a little bit lower or have an a la carte option because, in our case, we had to go to the next version of Enterprise X because we needed one feature, which was more than three projects. We don't need all the other capabilities, but we're paying for all those. It's almost twice the cost of the previous version. So, it would be nice to have something along those lines."

"I am not aware of its cost, but it is worth investing in this. My guess is that its price is not much because we generally prefer open-source solutions, and if we are investing, we don't go for expensive ones. Our selection is based on the market demand and needs, and we invest only if something is worth the cost."

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

15%

Educational Organization

10%

Non Tech Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog Artifactory?

The pricing is very competitive and fits well within our budget.

What needs improvement with JFrog Artifactory?

My advice to others looking into using JFrog Artifactory would be to improve build consistency, manage artifact governance, and centralize and streamline deployment flows for better tracking of con...

What is your primary use case for JFrog Artifactory?

My main use case for JFrog Artifactory is that we have been using it to manage binaries, which makes it flexible for diverse development. One of the strongest aspects of JFrog Artifactory is its se...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

Earlier I used to spend too much time understanding the insights from my projects. Now I only spend four to five hours, but I can get everything in one hour or even 30 seconds. It's easy. After one...

What needs improvement with Make?

Sometimes the platform is too laggy and loads slowly. The credits are also getting used up too quickly, which takes too much credit. If the credits could be reduced, that would be more efficient. T...

What is your primary use case for Make?

I'm using Make for integration with GoHighLevel, which is a CRM tool. I integrate data from Google Sheets or the GHL CRM to automate repetitive tasks. I use Make nearly every day for whatever task ...

Sonatype Nexus Repository vs JFrog Artifactory

Comparisons

Compared 57% of the time

Archiva vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudsmith Ultra - Enterprise vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 11% of the time

Azure Artifacts vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 7% of the time

Bitbucket Data Center vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 4% of the time

More JFrog Artifactory Competitors

Camunda vs Make

Compared 15% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs Make

Compared 15% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Pega Platform vs Make

Compared 11% of the time

Tray.io vs Make

Compared 11% of the time

More Make Competitors

Product Reports

Download JFrog Artifactory product report

JFrog Artifactory

May 2026

Download Make product report

April 2026

Also Known As

No data available

Integromat

Overview

JFrog Artifactory is a centralized repository that supports multiple artifact types, providing integration into CI/CD pipelines and authentication systems while ensuring secure access control and high availability.

JFrog Artifactory offers universal artifact management with features like versioning, global caching, and real-time federation. Organizations appreciate its scalability and consistent artifact handling, which reduces deployment errors and improves collaboration. While integration with CI/CD pipelines is strong, enhancements for search functionality and configuration simplification are needed, especially in multi-tenant environments. Some find database migration challenging, and the licensing model can be complex, particularly for self-hosted setups.

What are the key features of JFrog Artifactory?

Centralized Repository: Supports diverse artifact types for efficient storage and versioning.
CI/CD Integration: Seamlessly integrates with pipelines for automated artifact management.
Secure Access Control: Ensures secure, controlled access to artifacts.
High Availability and Global Caching: Enhances performance and reliability across deployments.
Real-time Federation: Improves metadata management and usability.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating JFrog Artifactory?

Scalability: Supports growth with consistent artifact management features.
Reduced Deployment Errors: Ensures reliable releases through efficient handling.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource usage, reducing operational costs.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork with streamlined processes.

Organizations across industries use JFrog Artifactory for storing and versioning software artifacts like Docker images and Maven builds. With CI/CD integration, it supports efficient artifact management, dependency handling, and secure distribution, enhancing workflow automation and ensuring quick, reliable releases in various environments.

JFrog

Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems.

At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in the creation of complex workflows without the need for extensive coding. Users value its adaptability, making it a popular choice for enhancing operational efficiency.

What features does Make offer?

Visual Workflow Builder: Create and edit workflows effortlessly with a friendly interface.
App Integration: Supports numerous apps, enabling diverse connections.
Real-Time Monitoring: Track workflow executions with precise analytics.
Conditional Logic: Implement logic paths for smarter automations.

What benefits can users expect from Make?

Increased Efficiency: Automating tasks reduces manual intervention, saving time.
Cost Reduction: Lower operational costs with streamlined processes.
Scalable Solutions: Easily adjust workflows to meet growing business demands.
Enhanced Productivity: Focus on high-priority tasks with automated operations.

In industries like retail and technology, Make has become essential for automating inventory management, order processing, and customer relationship tasks. Companies leverage its capacity to connect multiple databases, CRM systems, and sales platforms, driving growth and operational excellence.

Sample Customers

Oracle, Cisco, Cars.com, Riot Games, Google, CA Technologies

Buan Consulting, Armadia