JFrog Artifactory vs Make comparison

Read 18 Make reviews

4,089 Views
1,840 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

JFrog Artifactory

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

JFrog Artifactory and Make are two competing tools in the software management and automation category. Based on feature offerings, JFrog Artifactory takes the upper hand in artifact management, while Make stands out in integration and automation flexibility.

Features: JFrog Artifactory excels in artifact management with RTFS, centralized repositories, and CI/CD integration. Make offers a drag-and-drop interface, flexibility in integrations, and low-code AI-powered solutions.

Room for Improvement: JFrog Artifactory could improve its documentation, simplify user management, and enhance monitoring. Make needs to increase speed, optimize the pricing model, and provide better security documentation and UI refinement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JFrog Artifactory supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployments, with strong customer support but complex deployment management. Make is mostly deployed in the cloud, offering easier initial setup but with scalability challenges.

Pricing and ROI: JFrog Artifactory is considered expensive but vital for DevOps processes, with ROI from improved build and dependency management. Make is cost-effective compared to alternatives like Zapier, though pricing model adjustments could enhance alignment with usage.

To learn more, read our detailed JFrog Artifactory vs. Make Report (Updated: June 2026).

JFrog Artifactory vs. Make

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JFrog Artifactory

Ranking in AI Software Development

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Repository Managers (2nd)

Make

Ranking in AI Software Development

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of JFrog Artifactory is 0.4%. The mindshare of Make is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Software Development Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Make	0.5%
JFrog Artifactory	0.4%
Other	99.1%

AI Software Development

Featured Reviews

Vinod Bhupathiraju

Development Senior at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Supports a wide variety of packages with robust security features but needs tighter cloud integration

The best features of JFrog Artifactory include the core functionality of package management and software management, along with scanning capabilities to prevent vulnerabilities from being introduced. The metadata management feature was particularly useful for managing packages within JFrog Artifactory. We utilized Xray integration with JFrog Artifactory, which was instrumental in managing vulnerabilities overall. JFrog Artifactory has robust functionality in terms of access control, which helped us ensure minimal access to various artifacts. I would rate it eight out of ten because it is a great product that is widely used in the industry. It has excellent features from an artifact management perspective and maintains good integrations.

Read full review

Dinesh Lavu

Automation workflows have saved time and have reduced manual work for my client projects

Most of what I learned about Make is mainly from the templates only. Anything that I tried to do, I try to see who has done it already and try to understand and rebuild it. When I'm trying to build some workflows, there's a chatbot component. When I ask for something, it helps me in that. Or if I get a bug that I'm finding difficult to debug or understand the use case or the log, it clearly explains it to me and sometimes it advises me to do certain things, so that it's easy for me to fix it. One area for improvement is an auto-building feature. Another is how n8n has a chatbot completion where you can bring some LLMs into the workflow and integrating Ollama and all of that is something I felt is really needed for Make also.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature I have found is the JFrog CLI."

"Since we started using JFrog Artifactory, we no longer manage our own server just to keep source code and binary code, as all our binary repositories are in JFrog Artifactory, making it a very good repository manager where we can store all our artifacts in one easily accessible place without worrying about downtime or application unavailability, while also providing a proxy for remote applications that has transformed our release process to be faster."

"JFrog Artifactory has positively impacted my organization by centralizing artifact management and improving consistency across builds."

"Universal package support and custom properties help my team day-to-day by making us more efficient, as we have one tool with which all engineering teams can interact regardless of their team."

"HPE was using it for a lot of things, and they certainly had a massive implementation."

"I think JFrog Artifactory is good whether we use it for small scale or large scale operations."

"The feature that I like is Permission Targets. If I want to give permission to only deploy the cache, I can give that permission to a set of users. Similarly, if I want to overwrite an artifact with the same name from the same pipeline, I can give permission for that as well to particular users."

"JFrog Artifactory proved very helpful in supporting a variety of package types for different projects."

More JFrog Artifactory pros

"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."

"Make has helped me save my time, and time is money, so obviously, eventually it has helped me save my money as well."

"Instead of spending several days implementing and testing API integrations inside our FastAPI back end, I was able to build the workflows in a few hours using Make."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling me to generate numerous leads because it is easy to implement, which allowed me to drastically reduce the time needed to create and present a minimum viable product to clients."

"Make saves me roughly forty-five percent to sixty percent of time since the analysis part and solution are provided below the question."

"This means the task that I would complete in a span of one day is completed in a matter of minutes by using Make."

"This has made a very positive impact on my life because initially I was not able to do things quickly and efficiently, but now with the help of Make, I can plan many things that help my work become efficient."

"I am using Make for content creation, and it saves time in content creation for me and helps with tasks by creating content for me even without writing a single word."

More Make pros

Cons

"We're looking for something that has additional reporting capabilities on data growth and data aging. This goes back to storage lifecycle management so that the actual Artifactory itself can provide these reports to either the administrators or the users. I don't know if it has those capabilities. That's something we have to look into regarding the self-service dashboard, but the tool itself having those capabilities would be great rather than trying to do it at the underlying storage hardware layer."

"Looking back, I think the learning curve for JFrog Artifactory could be eased, and the installation process could feel less overwhelming."

"Currently, JFrog Artifactory doesn't have AI features, which is an area they could update in the future."

"Maybe around user experience, I think one improvement could be the UX, which shows its age, as it has not changed for a bit, but other than that, it is fine."

"I would like to see written technical support instead of having to contact them directly."

"The complexity of managing the tool and the high cost prevent it from being a ten, especially considering there are cloud-native alternatives that are cheaper and easier to use."

"I choose a nine out of ten because, as mentioned in my previous answer, it sometimes faces performance issues due to slow repository response and long download times for artifacts, which affects overall performance."

"It's an enterprise product that acts like an enterprise product. In other words, it's not a product where they focus on user experience."

More JFrog Artifactory cons

"Pricing is definitely something that is on a higher tier where we are consuming around 1.5 to 2 million operations per month, which makes the bill quite substantial."

"One area that needs improvement is the debugging and monitoring."

"Make can be improved in terms of the code module, as sometimes I use it at a developer level, and I want it to be more specific; when using the webhook, some data structures may require a lot of time to organize, so if a code node is available, it would help me structure data effectively."

"Make can enhance the credit limit for free use because what is happening now is that most of the credits have been used during testing only."

"I give Make a rating of seven because it is not open-sourced and there are many hidden charges, which can affect a beginner's workflow when trying it out."

"There is still a lot of difference when it comes to how the credits come into use and how to monetize what is being offered by Make."

"One area for improvement is an auto-building feature."

"I feel that Make can be improved in terms of API handling and integrations."

More Make cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a bit expensive. It could be a little bit lower or have an a la carte option because, in our case, we had to go to the next version of Enterprise X because we needed one feature, which was more than three projects. We don't need all the other capabilities, but we're paying for all those. It's almost twice the cost of the previous version. So, it would be nice to have something along those lines."

"I am not aware of its cost, but it is worth investing in this. My guess is that its price is not much because we generally prefer open-source solutions, and if we are investing, we don't go for expensive ones. Our selection is based on the market demand and needs, and we invest only if something is worth the cost."

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

15%

Educational Organization

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog Artifactory?

I do not have much experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing, as it was set up by a different team.

What needs improvement with JFrog Artifactory?

I cannot say much about how JFrog Artifactory can be improved. I appreciate the opportunity to add more about the needed improvements, even small ones. Maybe around user experience, I think one imp...

What is your primary use case for JFrog Artifactory?

My main use case for JFrog Artifactory is hosting artifacts for products, ranging from Docker images to Helm charts, and regular binaries. I can give you a specific example of how I use JFrog Artif...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Make, I would add that they need to provide a dark mode because the UI is in light mode. I remember that when I was working late...

What needs improvement with Make?

I think there are improvements needed for Make. They could add a guide roadmap for beginners to make it more accessible. While Make is easy to use, there is always room for improvement. There are m...

What is your primary use case for Make?

My main use case for Make involves automating social media content creation and personalized content creation for my social profile like Instagram.

Sonatype Nexus Repository vs JFrog Artifactory

Comparisons

Compared 53% of the time

Archiva vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 12% of the time

Cloudsmith Ultra - Enterprise vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 11% of the time

Azure Artifacts vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 9% of the time

Bitbucket Data Center vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 5% of the time

More JFrog Artifactory Competitors

Camunda vs Make

Compared 13% of the time

Pega Platform vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Zapier vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs Make

Compared 10% of the time

More Make Competitors

Product Reports

Download JFrog Artifactory product report

JFrog Artifactory

August 2026

Download Make product report

August 2026

Also Known As

No data available

Integromat

Overview

JFrog Artifactory is a centralized repository that supports multiple artifact types, providing integration into CI/CD pipelines and authentication systems while ensuring secure access control and high availability.

JFrog Artifactory offers universal artifact management with features like versioning, global caching, and real-time federation. Organizations appreciate its scalability and consistent artifact handling, which reduces deployment errors and improves collaboration. While integration with CI/CD pipelines is strong, enhancements for search functionality and configuration simplification are needed, especially in multi-tenant environments. Some find database migration challenging, and the licensing model can be complex, particularly for self-hosted setups.

What are the key features of JFrog Artifactory?

Centralized Repository: Supports diverse artifact types for efficient storage and versioning.
CI/CD Integration: Seamlessly integrates with pipelines for automated artifact management.
Secure Access Control: Ensures secure, controlled access to artifacts.
High Availability and Global Caching: Enhances performance and reliability across deployments.
Real-time Federation: Improves metadata management and usability.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating JFrog Artifactory?

Scalability: Supports growth with consistent artifact management features.
Reduced Deployment Errors: Ensures reliable releases through efficient handling.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource usage, reducing operational costs.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork with streamlined processes.

Organizations across industries use JFrog Artifactory for storing and versioning software artifacts like Docker images and Maven builds. With CI/CD integration, it supports efficient artifact management, dependency handling, and secure distribution, enhancing workflow automation and ensuring quick, reliable releases in various environments.

JFrog

Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems.

At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in the creation of complex workflows without the need for extensive coding. Users value its adaptability, making it a popular choice for enhancing operational efficiency.

What features does Make offer?

Visual Workflow Builder: Create and edit workflows effortlessly with a friendly interface.
App Integration: Supports numerous apps, enabling diverse connections.
Real-Time Monitoring: Track workflow executions with precise analytics.
Conditional Logic: Implement logic paths for smarter automations.

What benefits can users expect from Make?

Increased Efficiency: Automating tasks reduces manual intervention, saving time.
Cost Reduction: Lower operational costs with streamlined processes.
Scalable Solutions: Easily adjust workflows to meet growing business demands.
Enhanced Productivity: Focus on high-priority tasks with automated operations.

In industries like retail and technology, Make has become essential for automating inventory management, order processing, and customer relationship tasks. Companies leverage its capacity to connect multiple databases, CRM systems, and sales platforms, driving growth and operational excellence.

Sample Customers

Oracle, Cisco, Cars.com, Riot Games, Google, CA Technologies

Buan Consulting, Armadia