JFrog Artifactory vs Sonatype Nexus Repository comparison

JFrog and Sonatype are both solutions in the Repository Managers category. JFrog is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0, while Sonatype is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. JFrog holds a 39.2% mindshare in RM, compared to Sonatype’s 32.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of JFrog users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sonatype users who would recommend it.

JFrog Artifactory

Read 8 JFrog Artifactory reviews

4,729 Views
4,729 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Sonatype Nexus Repository

Read 16 Sonatype Nexus Repository reviews

5,215 Views
5,006 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JFrog Artifactory

Sonatype Nexus Repository

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Sonatype Nexus Repository and JFrog Artifactory compete in the realm of artifact repository management. JFrog Artifactory has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, despite Sonatype Nexus Repository receiving positive feedback for pricing and support.

Features: Sonatype Nexus Repository is valued for strong security features, diverse format support, and fine-grained access control. JFrog Artifactory excels with its universal binary repository model, robust integrations, and advanced automation capabilities. Features like REST APIs and Docker Hub integration make it appealing to professionals seeking scalability.

Room for Improvement: Sonatype Nexus Repository could enhance its interface and initial setup simplicity. Some users find documentation lacking clear examples, and CLI documentation could be improved. JFrog Artifactory might improve command line tool performance, enhance customization documentation, and better support complex network configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JFrog Artifactory supports hybrid environments with extensive documentation. Sonatype Nexus Repository offers a simpler setup process but adapting to complex environments may take time. Both provide robust customer service, though Sonatype’s direct assistance programs are noted for reducing deployment time effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Sonatype Nexus Repository is often seen as more cost-efficient with lower initial setup costs and quicker ROI. JFrog Artifactory, with potentially higher upfront costs, offers long-term value through its richer features and integration capabilities, promising justifiable ROI for larger deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed JFrog Artifactory vs. Sonatype Nexus Repository Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JFrog Artifactory vs. Sonatype Nexus Repository

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JFrog Artifactory

Ranking in Repository Managers

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sonatype Nexus Repository

Ranking in Repository Managers

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Distribution (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Repository Managers category, the mindshare of JFrog Artifactory is 39.2%, up from 36.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sonatype Nexus Repository is 32.7%, down from 33.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Repository Managers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Sonatype Nexus Repository	32.7%
JFrog Artifactory	39.2%
Other	28.099999999999994%

Repository Managers

Q&A Highlights

Mike_Wu

Senior Manager, IT at cgs-cimb

Aug 02, 2023

Sonatype Nexus Repository vs JFrog Artifactory: which one is better for Binary Repository and deployment?

We are facing a similar assessment, Nexus is more robust than Artifactory

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Matthew Iijima

Head of Infrastructure and DevOps at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Stores all our artifacts, allows users to manage permissions for their data, and is very stable

We're looking for something that has additional reporting capabilities on data growth and data aging. This goes back to storage lifecycle management so that the actual Artifactory itself can provide these reports to either the administrators or the users. I don't know if it has those capabilities. That's something we have to look into regarding the self-service dashboard, but the tool itself having those capabilities would be great rather than trying to do it at the underlying storage hardware layer. We moved from the internal Derby DB to the Postgres database last year or the year before. Because of the size and amount of objects in our instance, we were probably going to exceed the recommended number of objects for the default Derby DB. So, we moved to Postgres. The other option was MySQL. There weren't a lot of options. It could've been better. I felt that there wasn't a lot of knowledge base or support available to help with that migration for us. We had reached up to Artifactory support to see if they had a professional services type of engagement to do that, and they didn't have anything of that nature. So, we were left to our own devices to manage that database migration.

Read full review

CuneytGurses

DevOps Engineer at Sonne Technology, Inc.

A stable solution that provides a central platform for storing build artifacts, saving us significant maintenance and hardware costs.

Particularly concerning OSF-type licenses, while they support a multitude of features, there's room for improvement in the single point transform, especially for grouping. It appears that currently, the grouping functionality is not robust, particularly for Docker images within a group. The support for this aspect seems to be contingent on the license type. For instance, with the Voss license type, there is a noticeable absence of support for this feature. This is an area that could benefit from enhancement in the upcoming updates.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that I like is Permission Targets. If I want to give permission to only deploy the cache, I can give that permission to a set of users. Similarly, if I want to overwrite an artifact with the same name from the same pipeline, I can give permission for that as well to particular users."

"HPE was using it for a lot of things, and they certainly had a massive implementation."

"The most valuable feature is that it is a centralized repository and that you can open multiple repositories for different types of artifacts."

"The most valuable feature I have found is the JFrog CLI."

"The package registries have been helpful. GitLab, our previous solution, wasn't managing that well."

"For the most part, it's pretty stable."

"The core functionality is most valuable for indexing and metadata of all the artifacts, but within the last year or two, we've been using the Projects feature, which has been very helpful. We can now assign individual admins for different projects and repos so that they can self-manage their own user permissions for their data. My IT DevOps team doesn't have to be the facilitators of that. It's now more of a self-service capability for them."

"The key benefit we get from it is speed to delivery. It has improved our overall time to get new applications out with new code. That's true whether from a platform perspective, where we are quickly deploying up-to-date docker containers, or whether we are looking to deploy new code out to deliver a new application."

"The most valuables features of the Sonatype Nexus Repository are you can block any uploads that you do not want. For example, from Maven. Even though someone will try to create a pump file with a package not currently in our repository, they can go and get it, but it won't store it into the Sonatype Nexus Repository and therefore won't be propagated across the enterprise."

"The core features are the most important: We can host libraries, upload them, and they can be used across multiple teams."

"Navigation on the UI is easy and simple to understand."

"For us, the ability to do proxying and federations of repositories is very important. It gives us flexibility. We are the largest physics research laboratory in the world. With 12,000 people, we need to have good solutions to federate organizations inside our lab."

"The most important feature of Nexus Repository Manager is the storing and sharing of components. For Nexus IQ, it's the scanning of projects and the rating of vulnerabilities and license violations that we may have in our products."

"The primary feature is that I now have the ability to provide a central platform for storing build artifacts; a concise way for any project team to store its build with us."

"One of the most valuable features is the variety of permissions you can use on the repository. That helps us protect access to the information inside of the repository."

More Sonatype Nexus Repository pros

Cons

"We're looking for something that has additional reporting capabilities on data growth and data aging. This goes back to storage lifecycle management so that the actual Artifactory itself can provide these reports to either the administrators or the users. I don't know if it has those capabilities. That's something we have to look into regarding the self-service dashboard, but the tool itself having those capabilities would be great rather than trying to do it at the underlying storage hardware layer."

"In some of the latest versions of JFrog's SaaS solution, they changed the user interface, the SSO settings, how you interact with them over API, and how you generate tokens. It was very confusing for me. The overall user management is very complicated."

"I would like to see written technical support instead of having to contact them directly."

"It's an enterprise product that acts like an enterprise product. In other words, it's not a product where they focus on user experience. I wasn't an administrator, so I primarily worked with the command line tool to upload and download parts of the product. I was not impressed with that because it wasn't well documented. It was challenging to figure out how to get things to work."

"Sometimes the documentation was sort of messy because there are many possibilities for where and how to install Artifactory."

"The latest version that I am using is 7.41. It has been upgraded graphics-wise, but there is a bit of slowness. They can improve the graphical interface for the admin jobs and make it faster."

"The documentation is a bit sparse. That's our only complaint."

"They should provide automation for adding container images and artifacts in compliance with security requirements."

"We've had some challenges around the database they use. We've had some big outages and it's due to the fact that we haven't found the database they use is all that stable... We've had some really positive conversations with Sonatype around that and they've provided us with the support and special services to help us migrate off of that, on to another type of database platform which we have more control over."

"They should have some feature where we can move a specific repository from one instance of Nexus to another instance of Nexus. As of now, this feature doesn't exist."

"They should have the ability to support multiple data centers. That is actual scalability and, in effect, high-availability."

"We had some issues with the container platform, but we raised a support ticket and it was sorted out for us."

"Particularly concerning OSF-type licenses, while they support a multitude of features, there's room for improvement in the single point transform, especially for grouping. It appears that currently, the grouping functionality is not robust, particularly for Docker images within a group. The support for this aspect seems to be contingent on the license type. For instance, with the Voss license type, there is a noticeable absence of support for this feature. This is an area that could benefit from enhancement in the upcoming updates."

"When it comes to uploading NPM libraries, JavaScript dependencies libraries, it is a little bit of a convoluted process. They need to improve uploading libraries for NPM-type repositories."

"Sonatype Nexus Repository could improve by making the experience working with CI/CD pipelines, such as GitHub Action or GitLab better."

More Sonatype Nexus Repository cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a bit expensive. It could be a little bit lower or have an a la carte option because, in our case, we had to go to the next version of Enterprise X because we needed one feature, which was more than three projects. We don't need all the other capabilities, but we're paying for all those. It's almost twice the cost of the previous version. So, it would be nice to have something along those lines."

"I am not aware of its cost, but it is worth investing in this. My guess is that its price is not much because we generally prefer open-source solutions, and if we are investing, we don't go for expensive ones. Our selection is based on the market demand and needs, and we invest only if something is worth the cost."

"One of the challenges we had around licensing was how to deal with anonymous requests. According to the letter of the contract, an anonymous request consumes a license. We had to do some work to get over the fact that any anonymous interactions with the Repository product had to be put back to an end-user account."

"It's quite expensive. They are charging around $110 or $120 per user, per year. It's quite expensive in comparison to the other tools available in the market."

"I use the open-source version of the product, which is free of cost."

"Nexus Repository Manager Pro is quite affordable because it's about €100, per user, per year. Purchasing licenses was not really a big issue for us. Regarding Nexus IQ, it's much more expensive. We purchased 250 licenses and they cost us about €120,000."

"The cost is managed by the client."

"It seems like a fair price, based on other software solutions I've purchased."

"In my opinion, the pricing is very fair and very customer-oriented. It's much better than any other tool I have used so far."

"There were costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. The standard is free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Repository Managers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with JFrog Artifactory?

JFrog could improve this product with tighter integration capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JFrog Artifactory?

JFrog Artifactory is designed for software management. We used it for storing all assets and packages that were downloaded from external package systems, making them available for our development t...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JFrog Artifactory?

I am no longer using JFrog Artifactory in my current role as I moved away from the team. The metadata management features were very useful, particularly for managing packages inside JFrog Artifacto...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sonatype Nexus Repository?

Primarily, the extensive support for a wide range of packages is a crucial factor. The effectiveness of new-age package managers is often determined by the breadth of packages they can handle. In t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sonatype Nexus Repository?

I use the open-source version of the product, which is free of cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sonatype Nexus Repository?

We want to change the AWS credentials into an assume role instead of a fixed credential for authentication, but Sonatype Nexus Repository does not support this feature yet. This is a point of explo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Archiva vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 24% of the time

Cloudsmith Ultra - Enterprise vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 10% of the time

Inedo ProGet vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 5% of the time

Bitbucket Data Center vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 3% of the time

More JFrog Artifactory Competitors

Archiva vs Sonatype Nexus Repository

Compared 23% of the time

Cloudsmith Ultra - Enterprise vs Sonatype Nexus Repository

Compared 4% of the time

Bitbucket Data Center vs Sonatype Nexus Repository

Compared 2% of the time

Inedo ProGet vs Sonatype Nexus Repository

Compared 2% of the time

Symantec Ghost Solution Suite vs Sonatype Nexus Repository

Compared 2% of the time

More Sonatype Nexus Repository Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JFrog Artifactory

September 2025

Download JFrog Artifactory product report

Buyer's Guide

Sonatype Nexus Repository

September 2025

Download Sonatype Nexus Repository product report

Also Known As

No data available

Nexus Repository, Nexus Repository Manager

Overview

JFrog Artifactory is a powerful enterprise product designed for storing and managing different types of binaries, including artifacts, Dockery majors, and builds created as part of the CI process. It offers end-to-end binary management capabilities, integration with different environments and cloud providers, and a centralized repository with multiple repositories for different artifacts.

Artifactory has helped organizations modernize and automate their development operations, reducing the time it takes to develop and release software. It supports hybrid and multi-cloud environments, offers storage and database options flexibility, and integrates with other tools like Jira.

JFrog

Nexus Repository is powered by Repository Manager, the same technology engine found in our OSS version deployed at more than 100,000 organziations world-wide. It is Built on the shoulders of Maven, Repository Manager supports all popular component formats and brings your entire development organization together. It includes staging and release functionality that provides support for operations and quality assurance processes prior to production and gives you instant insight into potential component security, license, and quality issues, enabling teams to take corrective action early and quickly.

Sonatype

Sample Customers

Oracle, Cisco, Cars.com, Riot Games, Google, CA Technologies

Goldman Sachs, Toyota, Disney, Deutsche Bank

Buyer's Guide

JFrog Artifactory vs. Sonatype Nexus Repository

September 2025

Free Report: JFrog Artifactory vs. Sonatype Nexus Repository

Find out what your peers are saying about JFrog Artifactory vs. Sonatype Nexus Repository and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JFrog Artifactory vs. Sonatype Nexus Repository report.

See our list of best Repository Managers vendors.

We monitor all Repository Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.