Jedox vs Workiva Wdesk comparison

Jedox and Workiva are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Jedox is ranked #14, while Workiva is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.0. Jedox holds a 3.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to Workiva’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jedox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Workiva users who would recommend it.

Jedox

Read 13 Jedox reviews

2,428 Views
1,554 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Workiva Wdesk

Read 7 Workiva Wdesk reviews

4,191 Views
1,173 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Jedox

Workiva Wdesk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Workiva Wdesk and Jedox are key players in the financial and performance management sector, with Jedox showing advantages in pricing and return on investment.

Features: Workiva Wdesk offers robust regulatory compliance tools, advanced reporting features, and strong integration capabilities for seamless workflow optimization. It excels in making the compliance process efficient and effective, with its ability to automate reporting schedules and provide smooth ERP integration. Jedox emphasizes financial planning and analytics, powerful budgeting, and forecasting functionalities. Its Excel interface and support for dynamic reports are standout features, along with flexible API integration to connect with various databases and software platforms.

Room for Improvement: Workiva Wdesk could enhance its pricing model to be more competitive and expand its analytical functionalities beyond compliance and reporting. More customization flexibility might also benefit its range of service offerings. Jedox may improve by simplifying its deployment process and enhancing the user interface to ease the initial learning curve. More streamlined integration with non-financial systems could broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Workiva Wdesk leverages a cloud-based architecture, ensuring a streamlined implementation and robust support infrastructure. This approach allows users to easily transition and adapt to the system. On the other hand, Jedox requires more customization for deployment, which could lead to complexity but offers flexible service options tailored to individual customer needs.

Pricing and ROI: Workiva Wdesk's setup costs might be higher, justified by its comprehensive feature set for specific needs. It promises value despite the initial investment. Conversely, Jedox provides more cost-effective solutions with a stronger perceived ROI through its analytical flexibility and depth, making it a better option for businesses focused on long-term returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Jedox vs. Workiva Wdesk Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Workiva Wdesk

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 903,118 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jedox

Ranking in Business Performance Management

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Workiva Wdesk

Ranking in Business Performance Management

13th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (9th), Financial Close Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Jedox is 3.2%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workiva Wdesk is 3.3%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Workiva Wdesk	3.3%
Jedox	3.2%
Other	93.5%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Amol Ghoddke

Manager, Finance and Business Intelligence at NIDA Theatres

The solution provides dynamic reports while being easy to use

There is not much training for Jedox. There was no training available in the beginning at all. I had to reach out to them so they would give us something. I think they're getting better, though. The other issue is the dependence on the partner network. We used to deal directly with Jedox, but now it is all through partners, and Jedox's representatives are not in the picture anymore. It's not that partners are not doing a good job, but you're not dealing with the company directly since it's a partner most of the time. If you build your know-how within the company, it's good. Otherwise, the dependence on partners could end up being more costly. Suppose you do your development or don't need to develop constantly by starting with a sprint, deciding what you want to do, and setting up the cubes, databases, and everything correctly. In that case, you only need to develop different reports using the same data. However, it could be costly if you constantly need to develop reports or different cubes and store different systems without the in-house know-how.

Read full review

reviewer2510292

Corporate ESG Analyst at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has cross-functional connectivity but improvement is needed in script encoding

The tool's deployment is quick. Once the program is set up, you're ready to collect data and connect it to your report. The deployment team's size depends on the size of the company and how many different data providers you're utilizing. Some companies have one person doing everything, while others have a huge team. We're on the latter end of it, with many people involved. One great thing about the platform is that everything is consolidated in one place, providing a single resource for everyone. This is a benefit. The maintenance of the solution depends on the experience of the person managing the company's program. The company might have a contractor handling the back end and software management if they're low-level and only analyzing the data. However, if you have someone experienced with software and script encoding, that person might be the analyst and managing the program. Generally, most people are just analysts and not managing the software. There's an opportunity for improvement in user management of their software, and I hope they address this gap before the year ends.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The EPM is the most valuable feature."

"The Excel interface is designed to retrieve data from the database and send it back, which is a significant advantage."

"We can configure and have complete freedom while creating solutions."

"The solution is quick with analysis and calculation. The tool offers high digitalization which helps us to run the controlling department with less number of people. If the software wasn't there, I would need two to three people extra to run the department."

"The solution is very versatile."

"The ETL function simplifies many tasks."

"We use the tool for performance management and planning."

"The ETL itself was pretty useful and it's integrated in the tenant itself. So the Olap service technology was impressive to me. In order to extract that and load it in the tube in the same tenant or the same tool that was something magnificent because I actually missed this in SEB. SEB requires another tool, and you have to integrate all the tools together. But for Jedox, it was in the one tool."

More Jedox pros

"Workiva Wdesk is pretty good in terms of getting the data from the system, automating the reporting schedules...It has a very good integration with ERP tools."

"Workiva Wdesk has a flow diagram that is standardized, making it easy for people to file documents on ECDAs, which are in HTML format."

"It makes the compliance process more efficient and more effective."

"The cross-functionality between connectivity, whether through API connections between different software platforms or the connection of data collection to the actual written ESG report, is highly valuable. The connectivity of all these aspects significantly aids in data assurance, which I consider a bonus."

"The collaboration within the platform is valuable."

"It helps you to maintain a backup of your data, including the connectivity with the tables, which provides a user-friendly way to handle and access your files."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself."

"Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it."

"The solution should enable a modern look and feel in the front end."

"The solution needs to improve its support. The visualization in Microsoft BI is more modern and comfortable than Jedox's. I would expect something similar with the solution."

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."

"The tool has changed its pricing and it's now too expensive for small and medium organizations. I miss the open-source version which was free and we could do a lot of things with it."

"There is not much training for Jedox."

"I think it's the design of the report because the design and the UI for the report is standard and lame. When you see a Jedox report, it doesn't seem like it's from today, because the technology is something from the last decade. The scalability needs improvement."

More Jedox cons

"With this product, it's more about the integrated data model where you can have a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship between your policies and processes, risks, and controls. They need to showcase how you can put those pieces together."

"At this point, I don't see a compelling reason to invest in Workiva. It may be necessary for compliance and controlling the version of SCC, but not everyone needs its high-end capabilities."

"The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandatory or voluntary reporting requirements, leading to lost linkage connections that must be manually reset each time a change is made. This aspect is not functional now, and I see it as an opportunity for improvement."

"The most critical issue is the need to shift between uppercase and lowercase."

"Regarding the solution, reporting has certain areas that can be considered for improvement."

"The speed must be improved."

"One area where Workiva Wdesk could improve is by ensuring that its cloud-based system is fully compatible with the most current versions of PowerPoint and Excel."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"Excellent value for money."

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

"Our clients in Asia think that the solution is too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

903,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Workiva Wdesk?

The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandat...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Workiva Wdesk?

I've been working with the tool's script encoding departments and top management to address gaps in their script encoding. They are working towards closing these gaps to ensure we can continue usin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Anaplan vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Board vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Business Data Cloud vs Jedox

Compared 6% of the time

More Jedox Competitors

AuditBoard vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 6% of the time

RSA Archer vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

Scytale vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

RiskOptics ROAR Platform vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 3% of the time

Robert Half Protiviti vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 3% of the time

More Workiva Wdesk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jedox

June 2026

Download Jedox product report

Buyer's Guide

Workiva Wdesk

June 2026

Download Workiva Wdesk product report

Also Known As

Jedox EPM

Wdesk

Overview

Jedox offers flexibility and customization for corporate performance management, focusing on financial consolidation, planning, budgeting, and forecasting. Its Excel and Power BI integrations and strong API connections enhance integration capabilities.

Jedox provides a user-friendly interface for comprehensive planning, allowing companies to create different cubes, facilitating intuitive dashboards, dynamic reporting, and advanced analytical features. Its powerful ETL functionality improves integration with diverse systems, making data entry and customizable reporting efficient. Although requiring implementation and maintenance efforts, Jedox proves effective in management reporting, financial analysis, and data transfer processes. However, visualization options, UI, scalability, and pricing structure could improve.

What are the key features of Jedox?

Flexibility and Customization: Adaptable planning with customizable cubes.
Excel Integration: Seamless integration for ease of use.
ETL Functionality: Enhanced data integration capabilities.
Intuitive Dashboard: User-friendly interface with dynamic reporting.
Power BI and API Connections: Strong integration with business tools.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Efficiency in Planning: Streamlined financial consolidation and budgeting processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Improved management reporting for stakeholders.
Data Integration: Effective data transfer capabilities within systems.
Scalability: Custom solutions for growing enterprise needs.

Companies in industries like hospitality use Jedox for tailored planning solutions such as room and meal planning. Organizations employ Jedox for creating ERP solutions, HR dashboards, and cost center reporting, utilizing it for financial analysis and integration needs.

Jedox

Workiva Wdesk specializes in updating financial results with seamless API connectivity and strong data assurance. Valued for its effective compliance processes, the platform enhances collaboration, making it efficient for financial data handling and reporting schedules.

Known for its integration with ERP tools, Workiva Wdesk supports standardized data flow, easing management and document replication for updates. Its user-friendly interface facilitates efficient collaboration for tasks like SOX, internal audit, and SEC filings. However, users point out the need for better compatibility with PowerPoint and Excel features, improved search functionality, and enhanced data linkage management. There are also concerns regarding encoding, data loss during server refreshes, and workflow inefficiencies.

What are the key features of Workiva Wdesk?

Seamless API Connectivity: Allows for easy integration with existing systems.
Data Assurance: Provides robust backup and security.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and task management.
ERP Integration: Supports standardized data flow and document updates.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances teamwork with multiple contributors on projects.

What benefits should users expect?

Improved Financial Reporting: Streamlined report generation for SEC filings and financial reporting.
Enhanced Compliance: Effective processes for SOX and internal audits.
Efficient Data Management: Standardized data flow and document handling.
Increased Productivity: User-friendly interface aids swift adoption and use.

Workiva Wdesk is extensively used across industries for creating and managing board deck presentations, aiding teams in generating annual reports and preparing detailed reports including data tables. It facilitates collaboration in financial settings, addressing needs in compliance, risk management, and audit preparation.

Workiva

Sample Customers

BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever

Noodles Company, eBay, Winnebago, American Assets Trust, AmericanEnterprise, Calpian, Capstone Infrastructure, Cascades, Circor International, Coeur Mining, Davey, Dr Pepper Snapple

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Workiva Wdesk

June 2026

Free Report: Jedox vs. Workiva Wdesk

Find out what your peers are saying about Jedox vs. Workiva Wdesk and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

903,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jedox vs. Workiva Wdesk report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.