IBM Planning Analytics vs Jedox comparison

Read 13 Jedox reviews

1,881 Views
1,091 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Planning Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM Planning Analytics and Jedox are leading analytics platforms competing in the business planning sector. IBM Planning Analytics holds an advantage in data integration and scalability, whereas Jedox excels with user-friendly customization options.

Features: IBM Planning Analytics offers advanced forecasting and predictive analytics, a unified database for streamlined planning, and a sandboxing feature for in-depth analysis. Jedox provides flexible modeling, dynamic and intuitive report creation, and seamless cross-platform integration for comprehensive business planning.

Room for Improvement: IBM Planning Analytics could enhance user interface design and reduce complexity in its deployment processes. Improving mobile functionality can also be beneficial. Jedox could benefit from enhanced scalability options, improved support for large datasets, and a more refined interface for complex planning scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Planning Analytics offers robust support but has a complex deployment model that requires guidance. Jedox provides a smoother deployment experience with a strong service approach, ensuring faster implementation and easy adjustments.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Planning Analytics involves a higher setup cost but offers strong ROI for large enterprises with complex needs. Jedox presents a cost-effective setup appealing to businesses seeking quicker returns through agile planning and efficient resource allocation.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox Report (Updated: March 2026).

IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox

Download the complete report

Helped 885,728 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Planning Analytics

Ranking in Business Performance Management

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jedox

Ranking in Business Performance Management

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of IBM Planning Analytics is 4.4%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jedox is 4.1%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Planning Analytics	4.4%
Jedox	4.1%
Other	91.5%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Gladys Njeri

Key Account Manager at DHL

Data-driven planning has transformed financial decisions and now saves major reporting time

IBM Planning Analytics helps with collaboration between teams by allowing us to gather data from various departments, analyze it, and collaborate on the data to make data-driven decisions between different departments easily. As I mentioned previously, I mainly use IBM Planning Analytics to visualize the existing data to generate meaningful report dashboards and use it during stakeholder meetings to arrive at the right decision. The best features IBM Planning Analytics offers include budgeting, forecasting, and what-if scenario analysis. The scenario modeling feature in IBM Planning Analytics is probably the most robust planning and forecasting solution we use, especially for what-if scenarios, where we are able to forecast using Watson Studio, which helps in better prediction. I really appreciate the Excel integration in IBM Planning Analytics because it keeps things familiar and adds more power.

Read full review

Riyaz Halani

Financial Controller at Zalando SE

Powerful BI tool for analyzing financial performance and stable performance

I would rate the scalability of Jedox a seven out of ten. There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself. So that's where the main improvements lie—making it easy for people to not depend on just technical finance teams. There are almost 50 to 60 users using Jedox in our organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Navigating through the data to make analysis is really quick."

"The flexibility of IBM Planning Analytics is a great feature of this solution, with design flexibility using data rules and defining calculations, the ability to combine online and offline calculations, and very good forecasting features and predictive analytics."

"A lot of the platform is in-memory, so Planning Analytics can run calculations quite fast. It also offers several user interfaces. And in the newest version of Planning Analytics, there is a new one called the Planning Analytics Workspace. Maybe it could be useful for the business side."

"The flexibility of IBM Planning Analytics is a great feature of this solution. The design flexibility with data rules and defining calculations The ability to combine online and offline calculations are a benefit. Additionally, the forecasting features and predictive analytics is very good."

"I don't think there are many tools out there that are as flexible as this solution."

"The scenario modeling capabilities are frequently used to create different scenarios, compare them, and see which action leads to which result."

"IBM Planning Analytics can help us build scenarios through a sandbox environment, allowing us to test multiple variables and assess their impact on our budget and planning."

"The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized."

More IBM Planning Analytics pros

"The solution is very versatile."

"The data entry point is most valuable, and the way we can customize our report or do data entry is very good."

"The customer porting is the most valuable feature."

"The data entry point is most valuable. The way we can customize our report or do data entry is very good."

"The ETL function simplifies many tasks."

"The solution is quick with analysis and calculation. The tool offers high digitalization which helps us to run the controlling department with less number of people. If the software wasn't there, I would need two to three people extra to run the department."

"The ETL itself was pretty useful and it's integrated in the tenant itself. So the Olap service technology was impressive to me. In order to extract that and load it in the tube in the same tenant or the same tool that was something magnificent because I actually missed this in SEB. SEB requires another tool, and you have to integrate all the tools together. But for Jedox, it was in the one tool."

"With Jedox, those kinds of pain points have been removed, and now if I create my dashboard once, people just need to add the data or pull the data, or the data just comes in on a scheduled basis from various systems, and my dashboards are ready."

More Jedox pros

Cons

"The tool's transport layer could be improved when promoting development between environments."

"It is a bit expensive, but it does the job."

"Extracting data is a little slow."

"If we talk only about the TM1 engine, it's quite rich and possibly too rich, making it complex to perform simple tasks."

"It would have been better if the solution was not just a tool kit."

"Planning Analytics could be improved by adding automation features."

"It would have been better if the solution was not just a tool kit. They did not embed some functionalities already developed, we are having to develop them ourselves."

"Pulling data from planning crashes very often."

More IBM Planning Analytics cons

"The solution should enable a modern look and feel in the front end."

"From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process."

"I don't find it particularly user-friendly."

"There is not much training for Jedox."

"There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself."

"Jedox should improve the design and server issues."

"Online pixel-perfect reporting is an aspect that has room for improvement."

"It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming."

More Jedox cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing cost is approximately $50,000.00 per year."

"The license of this solution is paid annually. Most of my customers choose a license that includes support."

"IBM Planning Analytics is priced well, and licensing costs are yearly."

"It is a bit expensive, but you get what you are paying for."

"IBM Planning Analytics is not the cheapest solution, but it's priced per the market standard for this type of solution. I rate the price at seven out of ten."

"Compared with the other tools in the market, IBM Planning Analytics is a bit expensive."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten since it's expensive."

"Excellent value for money."

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Planning Analytics?

The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Planning Analytics?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for IBM Planning Analytics is that the pricing and licensing cost can be somewhat on the higher side, especially for small organizations. Howev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Planning Analytics?

IBM Planning Analytics could be improved by simplifying the learning curve, as it requires a lot of time to learn and master it. The advanced features are somewhat complex to understand, and if the...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 10% of the time

SAP Business Data Cloud vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 9% of the time

Anaplan vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

Board vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 4% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Planning Analytics Competitors

Microsoft Power BI vs Jedox

Compared 10% of the time

Board vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Anaplan vs Jedox

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Hyperion vs Jedox

Compared 5% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs Jedox

Compared 5% of the time

More Jedox Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Planning Analytics

Download IBM Planning Analytics product report

Download Jedox product report

Also Known As

Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1

Jedox EPM

Overview

IBM Planning Analytics is an integrated planning solution that uses AI to automate planning, budgeting, and forecasting and drive more intelligent workflows.

Built on TM1, IBM’s powerful calculation engine, this enterprise performance management tool allows you to transcend the limits of manual planning and become the Analytics Hero your business needs. Quickly and easily drive faster, more accurate plans for FP&A, sales, supply chain and beyond.

IBM

Integrated Corporate Performance Management software provides reliable data, insights, and guidance to everyone in your company. Jedox delivers it all: Self-service budgeting, planning, and forecasting combined with intuitive analytics and BI dashboards in one integrated software platform. Users across the enterprise in any department from Finance to Sales, HR, and Procurement create integrated plans and reports based on the same data model and business logic. Integrate financial planning and analysis with operational plans and reporting to optimize processes, boost data quality, and slash planning cycles throughout the organization.

Sample Customers

ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services

BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever

IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox