IBM Planning Analytics vs Jedox comparison

IBM and Jedox are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while Jedox is ranked #13. IBM holds a 4.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to Jedox’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jedox users who would recommend it.

IBM Planning Analytics

Read 29 IBM Planning Analytics reviews

4,160 Views
2,413 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Jedox

Read 13 Jedox reviews

2,428 Views
1,554 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Planning Analytics

Jedox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM Planning Analytics and Jedox are leading analytics platforms competing in the business planning sector. IBM Planning Analytics holds an advantage in data integration and scalability, whereas Jedox excels with user-friendly customization options.

Features: IBM Planning Analytics offers advanced forecasting and predictive analytics, a unified database for streamlined planning, and a sandboxing feature for in-depth analysis. Jedox provides flexible modeling, dynamic and intuitive report creation, and seamless cross-platform integration for comprehensive business planning.

Room for Improvement: IBM Planning Analytics could enhance user interface design and reduce complexity in its deployment processes. Improving mobile functionality can also be beneficial. Jedox could benefit from enhanced scalability options, improved support for large datasets, and a more refined interface for complex planning scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Planning Analytics offers robust support but has a complex deployment model that requires guidance. Jedox provides a smoother deployment experience with a strong service approach, ensuring faster implementation and easy adjustments.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Planning Analytics involves a higher setup cost but offers strong ROI for large enterprises with complex needs. Jedox presents a cost-effective setup appealing to businesses seeking quicker returns through agile planning and efficient resource allocation.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 906,960 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Planning Analytics

Ranking in Business Performance Management

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jedox

Ranking in Business Performance Management

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of IBM Planning Analytics is 4.2%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jedox is 3.1%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Planning Analytics	4.2%
Jedox	3.1%
Other	92.7%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Gladys Njeri

Key Account Manager at DHL

Data-driven planning has transformed financial decisions and now saves major reporting time

IBM Planning Analytics helps with collaboration between teams by allowing us to gather data from various departments, analyze it, and collaborate on the data to make data-driven decisions between different departments easily. As I mentioned previously, I mainly use IBM Planning Analytics to visualize the existing data to generate meaningful report dashboards and use it during stakeholder meetings to arrive at the right decision. The best features IBM Planning Analytics offers include budgeting, forecasting, and what-if scenario analysis. The scenario modeling feature in IBM Planning Analytics is probably the most robust planning and forecasting solution we use, especially for what-if scenarios, where we are able to forecast using Watson Studio, which helps in better prediction. I really appreciate the Excel integration in IBM Planning Analytics because it keeps things familiar and adds more power.

Read full review

Amol Ghoddke

Manager, Finance and Business Intelligence at NIDA Theatres

The solution provides dynamic reports while being easy to use

There is not much training for Jedox. There was no training available in the beginning at all. I had to reach out to them so they would give us something. I think they're getting better, though. The other issue is the dependence on the partner network. We used to deal directly with Jedox, but now it is all through partners, and Jedox's representatives are not in the picture anymore. It's not that partners are not doing a good job, but you're not dealing with the company directly since it's a partner most of the time. If you build your know-how within the company, it's good. Otherwise, the dependence on partners could end up being more costly. Suppose you do your development or don't need to develop constantly by starting with a sprint, deciding what you want to do, and setting up the cubes, databases, and everything correctly. In that case, you only need to develop different reports using the same data. However, it could be costly if you constantly need to develop reports or different cubes and store different systems without the in-house know-how.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM Planning Analytics can help us build scenarios through a sandbox environment, allowing us to test multiple variables and assess their impact on our budget and planning."

"We cut down on manual budgeting and forecasting work, which saved us between 50 to 70% of our time."

"Some of our customers previously used Excel spreadsheets for budget planning, and the process took more than two months, however, after switching to Planning Analytics, they could do it in a week."

"For forecast, budgeting and reporting financial data, TM1 is the best tool in the market."

"This level of stability is crucial for a product like Cognos TM1, as using an unstable platform would result in loss of time."

"It provides all the required functionalities for Financial Performance Management, such as planning, budgeting, forecasting, consolidation and dimensional reporting and analysis."

"It is a great tool."

"All the different platforms are well integrated."

More IBM Planning Analytics pros

"The ETL function simplifies many tasks."

"The solution is quick with analysis and calculation. The tool offers high digitalization which helps us to run the controlling department with less number of people. If the software wasn't there, I would need two to three people extra to run the department."

"We use the tool for performance management and planning."

"We can configure and have complete freedom while creating solutions."

"The customer porting is the most valuable feature."

"The data entry point is most valuable, and the way we can customize our report or do data entry is very good."

"The ETL itself was pretty useful and it's integrated in the tenant itself. So the Olap service technology was impressive to me. In order to extract that and load it in the tube in the same tenant or the same tool that was something magnificent because I actually missed this in SEB. SEB requires another tool, and you have to integrate all the tools together. But for Jedox, it was in the one tool."

"The system is quite flexible. Based on our requirements, we create different cubes that can help us to do complete planning."

More Jedox pros

Cons

"IBM is behind competitors like Tableau and Power BI in terms of visualization. Their visuals are less innovative and practical with fewer varieties."

"The disadvantage is the old-fashioned surface of IBM Cognos TM1."

"Planning Analytics could be improved by adding automation features."

"The dashboard is very poor and needs a lot of improvement."

"Pulling data from planning crashes very often."

"TM1 is a bit expensive, especially for small companies who should look more at products like Jedox or Tableau etc.. Who propose all in 1 products with good looking visualization components"

"The tool's transport layer could be improved when promoting development between environments."

"The local authentication part is difficult to manage in the product, making it an area where improvements are required."

More IBM Planning Analytics cons

"There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself."

"From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process."

"Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it."

"The tool has changed its pricing and it's now too expensive for small and medium organizations. I miss the open-source version which was free and we could do a lot of things with it."

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."

"Jedox should improve the design and server issues."

"More emphasis is needed on the availability of the learning aspect of the solution. Because unless you take up their course that enables you to be an expert in creating the report, you must seek help."

"Online pixel-perfect reporting is an aspect that has room for improvement."

More Jedox cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a bit expensive, but you get what you are paying for."

"The license of this solution is paid annually. Most of my customers choose a license that includes support."

"IBM Planning Analytics is not the cheapest solution, but it's priced per the market standard for this type of solution. I rate the price at seven out of ten."

"IBM Planning Analytics is priced well, and licensing costs are yearly."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten since it's expensive."

"Our licensing cost is approximately $50,000.00 per year."

"Compared with the other tools in the market, IBM Planning Analytics is a bit expensive."

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"Excellent value for money."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

906,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Retailer

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Planning Analytics?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for IBM Planning Analytics is that the pricing and licensing cost can be somewhat on the higher side, especially for small organizations. Howev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Planning Analytics?

IBM Planning Analytics could be improved by simplifying the learning curve, as it requires a lot of time to learn and master it. The advanced features are somewhat complex to understand, and if the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Planning Analytics?

My main use case for IBM Planning Analytics is as an IT software engineer, and I typically use it day-to-day for planning analytics over the past two years. It is probably the most robust planning ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SAP Business Data Cloud vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

Anaplan vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 6% of the time

Board vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 5% of the time

Planful vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Planning Analytics Competitors

Anaplan vs Jedox

Compared 8% of the time

Board vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Business Data Cloud vs Jedox

Compared 6% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs Jedox

Compared 4% of the time

More Jedox Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics

July 2026

Download IBM Planning Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

Jedox

July 2026

Download Jedox product report

Also Known As

Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1

Jedox EPM

Overview

IBM Planning Analytics offers a robust planning, budgeting, and forecasting platform powered by TM1 technologies, integrating with Excel while offering real-time calculations, data governance, and security.

Supporting flexible scenario modeling and forecasting, IBM Planning Analytics enhances planning processes via machine learning, real-time data calculations, and meaningful collaboration. In-memory processing and data slicing boost automation, reduces errors, and increase performance, while the centralized database facilitates secure and governed data management. Sandbox environments assist users in testing scenarios, and integration with Excel is crucial for financial planning and resource allocation.

What are the key features of IBM Planning Analytics?

TM1 Perspective Client: Integrated Excel-like interface for a familiar user experience.
Centralized Database: Provides robust and secure data management capabilities.
Sandbox Environments: Enables scenario testing without impacting live data.
Real-Time Calculations: Offers immediate data processing and analysis.
Excel Integration: Provides seamless transition and collaboration for planning tasks.

Which benefits and ROI should users consider?

Collaboration: Enhances teamwork in decision-making processes.
Automation: Streamlines processes, reduces errors, and accelerates tasks.
Data Governance: Ensures data security and compliance.
Performance: Faster processing through in-memory technology.
Scenario Modeling: Allows comprehensive comparisons for effective planning.

In multiple industries, IBM Planning Analytics is key in supporting budgeting, planning, and forecasting efforts. Financial services use it for cash flow modeling and resource allocation, while manufacturing sectors benefit from its dashboard-driven data visualization capabilities. Businesses utilize its robust reporting and real-time analysis functionalities to manage resources and assess future risks effectively.

IBM

Jedox offers flexibility and customization for corporate performance management, focusing on financial consolidation, planning, budgeting, and forecasting. Its Excel and Power BI integrations and strong API connections enhance integration capabilities.

Jedox provides a user-friendly interface for comprehensive planning, allowing companies to create different cubes, facilitating intuitive dashboards, dynamic reporting, and advanced analytical features. Its powerful ETL functionality improves integration with diverse systems, making data entry and customizable reporting efficient. Although requiring implementation and maintenance efforts, Jedox proves effective in management reporting, financial analysis, and data transfer processes. However, visualization options, UI, scalability, and pricing structure could improve.

What are the key features of Jedox?

Flexibility and Customization: Adaptable planning with customizable cubes.
Excel Integration: Seamless integration for ease of use.
ETL Functionality: Enhanced data integration capabilities.
Intuitive Dashboard: User-friendly interface with dynamic reporting.
Power BI and API Connections: Strong integration with business tools.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Efficiency in Planning: Streamlined financial consolidation and budgeting processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Improved management reporting for stakeholders.
Data Integration: Effective data transfer capabilities within systems.
Scalability: Custom solutions for growing enterprise needs.

Companies in industries like hospitality use Jedox for tailored planning solutions such as room and meal planning. Organizations employ Jedox for creating ERP solutions, HR dashboards, and cost center reporting, utilizing it for financial analysis and integration needs.

Jedox

Sample Customers

ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services

BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox

June 2026

Free Report: IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

906,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.