We performed a comparison between JD Edwards World and Microsoft Dynamics AX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The pricing is okay. It's not overly expensive."
"The ease of use is consistently there."
"I like that JD Edwards World is perfect for my use cases, but what I like best about it is its navigation."
"I think JDE ERP is very flexible and very convenient for the users. I think EnterpriseOne is more convenient for users to do the inquiry and do the data entry. The UI is better than JDE World. For JDE products, including the World version, is very flexible. It's a good product for clients."
"Menu creation is easier now."
"It has worked fine for many years."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards World is its ease of use and unique functions."
"Collecting data in standard formats for processing in a data warehouse."
"The most valuable feature for us is the manufacturing module. It addresses our product costing for tuna canning."
"Microsoft Dynamics is very stable."
"It is stable, suitable for businesses, and covers all business needs."
"One of the valuable features of the solution is how easy it is to use."
"The accounting and inventory management features are valuable."
"The tool's most valuable feature is reporting."
"If anyone is familiar with Microsoft products then they can handle it easily."
"It has the same UI and is very similar to any other Microsoft product."
"The pricing for JD Edwards World could be more affordable so that it could be available to a broader audience. My clients want more analytics or data analysis features from JD Edwards World."
"The integration technology could be stronger at this point."
"Its end of life is already announced, so I don't expect lots of improvement coming from the product anywhere anymore."
"Update interface capabilities and data maintenance tools to modern standards."
"Improvements are needed in transitioning JD Edwards World to a more stable and reliable cloud product, particularly in terms of GDPR and data privacy compliance."
"World is old, so everybody is looking to just upgrade or migrate from it."
"I would like report creation to be easier."
"There is no support from Oracle here. We only have third-party support."
"The implementation was completed within one month."
"The product is standardised across industries so it is not a good fit for all types of sectors."
"There are so many errors."
"Microsoft Dynamics AX should include more connectors for third-party integrations. It should also include more features that AI models can govern."
"The product takes some training to get up to speed on all functionality and modules in Microsoft Dynamics AX 2012 ERP system."
"At times there are issues related to reporting, sometimes with the integration between two or three modules, and sometimes to the logic itself."
"There is room for improvement in the licensing model and associated costs of this solution."
"The on-premises and desktop versions are not user-friendly."
JD Edwards World is ranked 16th in ERP with 11 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked 6th in ERP with 51 reviews. JD Edwards World is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Dynamics AX is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of JD Edwards World writes "A good legacy solution that is reliable and has good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics AX writes "A stable product that offers excellent ROI and reliable technical support". JD Edwards World is most compared with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite, SAP S/4HANA and Pronto Xi, whereas Microsoft Dynamics AX is most compared with SAP ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP. See our JD Edwards World vs. Microsoft Dynamics AX report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.