JD Edwards World vs SAP ERP comparison

Oracle and SAP are both solutions in the ERP category. Oracle is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.6, while SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9. Oracle holds a 1.0% mindshare in ERP, compared to SAP’s 17.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SAP users who would recommend it.

JD Edwards World

Read 16 JD Edwards World reviews

767 Views
744 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SAP ERP

Read 107 SAP ERP reviews

12,769 Views
10,854 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

JD Edwards World

SAP ERP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

SAP ERP and JD Edwards World compete in the ERP software category. SAP ERP appears to have the upper hand in business integrations and comprehensive functionality, while JD Edwards World excels in ease of use and specific module support.

Features: SAP ERP provides extensive business efficiency with modules supporting finance, supply chain management, and human capital management. Its customizable features and seamless integration capabilities make it suitable for large enterprises. JD Edwards World is known for its user-friendliness, offering unique functionalities and solid support in modules such as MRP and traceability.

Room for Improvement: SAP ERP is often criticized for its high costs, a complex user interface, and integration challenges with external systems. Users seek a better user experience and more straightforward integration options. JD Edwards World is perceived as outdated, lacking modern support and significant updates, with much of its functionality considered legacy.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP ERP offers both on-premises and cloud configurations, catering to various business scales. Its customer service is generally satisfactory but noted for slow and costly technical support. JD Edwards World primarily provides on-premises deployment, with its support often criticized for being outsourced and insufficiently robust.

Pricing and ROI: SAP ERP comes with high licensing fees and maintenance costs, making it less accessible for small to medium enterprises, though its ROI is achieved over several years through efficiency gains. JD Edwards World is more financially accessible, benefiting from legacy product pricing, but its ROI potential is limited by its narrower feature set compared to SAP ERP.

To learn more, read our detailed JD Edwards World vs. SAP ERP Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards World vs. SAP ERP

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JD Edwards World

Ranking in ERP

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP ERP

Ranking in ERP

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

107

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of JD Edwards World is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP ERP is 17.2%, down from 22.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP ERP	17.2%
JD Edwards World	1.0%
Other	81.8%

ERP

Featured Reviews

Tapas Karmakar

Oracle Technology Artchitect and Specialist at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Integration capabilities and reporting functions enhance workflow efficiency

The primary issue I have observed is that when JD Edwards World is installed, it involves a shared architecture between the development, test, and production environments. This setup should be avoided. Additionally, Oracle should integrate some AI features into JD Edwards World but not rely entirely on AI due to potential disadvantages, such as increased electricity consumption impacting global warming. Improvements are also needed in tech support, specifically in response time and quality.

Read full review

Achmad Dimyati

IT Service Management Team Lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Long-term adaptation and evolution meets changing technology trends

SAP ERP is not really real-time. We use the HANA database which is supposed to be memory data in memory, but we are still not very happy. It is supposed to be real-time and come very quickly, but in reality, it still takes time to run. That is why we use BW of SAP, Business Objects, and now we have moved to the Analytic Cloud where we start using predictive AI. SAP recently implemented Databricks, and they started investing significantly in the analytic environment. SAP ERP has been left behind as they moved to S/4HANA with the HANA database. They restructured the whole table structure of SAP ERP, introduced simple finance, simple logistics, and moved HR to SuccessFactors. They have the BTP layer where they manage everything from integration to master data management. The challenge with SAP is that they move very fast to different products and buy different products. It requires significant investment and many skills to catch up because all of these have different sets of technology. The fundamental has changed differently. It is not monolithic anymore but different products under one name, SAP. You have to buy it model by model for additional models. Products such as SuccessFactors, Ariba for procure to pay, Concur for travel, and Facility Management use totally different technology. They try to integrate with each other, but it remains a challenge for SAP to make them have the same management, technology, and operational approach.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards World is its ease of use and unique functions."

"The ease of use is consistently there."

"We've found the initial setup to be easy."

"I like that JD Edwards World is perfect for my use cases, but what I like best about it is its navigation."

"JD Edwards World is a good ERP with high security from the application design."

"JD Edwards World supports operations in manufacturing and distribution, which are crucial for our organization."

"I rate JD Edwards World as an eight."

"Collecting data in standard formats for processing in a data warehouse."

More JD Edwards World pros

"Its integration is most valuable."

"Finance view across functions is valuable."

"SAP ERP is particularly strong in manufacturing, from production planning to plant maintenance, then Material Management itself, and managing warehouse management and inventory control."

"Heavy integration is available with all types of systems, and we use it."

"It provides great visibility into the details of enterprise resource planning."

"The solution has made the most significant impact on our human resources function, specifically in HR operations and HR analytics. One feature of SAP ERP that I found most valuable is its use of codes for accessing specific functions."

"It meets our requirements for what we need it to do in the manufacturing industry."

"It is an integrated application, and it has been working really well. Earlier, there were different companies for different applications for manufacturing, finance controlling, logistics, and quality. It probably was the first fully integrated application. Whenever somebody is entering any data, for example, invoice data or ordering data, everyone with a right to see this data can see it in the system."

More SAP ERP pros

Cons

"The flexibility and ability to integrate external applications are increasingly vital."

"I have more than 18 years of JDE experience in JDE EnterpriseOne and World versions. I think JDE is good but compared to SAP and Oracle EPS, we can see which area needs to have some improvement for JDE."

"The integration technology could be stronger at this point."

"World is old, so everybody is looking to just upgrade or migrate from it."

"The technical support from Oracle needs a lot of improvement. Both the response time and quality of support require enhancement."

"The pricing for JD Edwards World could be more affordable so that it could be available to a broader audience. My clients want more analytics or data analysis features from JD Edwards World."

"The user interface in JD Edwards World is very crude; I press a button to get to the application, unlike EnterpriseOne, which offers a more finished experience with dashboards."

"I would like report creation to be easier."

More JD Edwards World cons

"The reporting feature could improve in SAP ERP. It could benefit from being more flexible."

"The production system must be upgraded."

"The system is very big. It is not exactly user-friendly, due to the fact that it's so massive and complex."

"It is very expensive to customize to meet compliance with regulations in some countries."

"It was not designed to service all industries."

"ERP could use better integration with other systems."

"If big companies are going for SAP and they would like to install it, they should know that it still needs time. Implementation will cost a lot of money."

"Improvements to the UI. The UI is pretty old, but this will change with the upcoming release of S.4."

More SAP ERP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of JD Edwards World is reasonable. Since it is a legacy solution the price has been reduced."

"The pricing for JD Edwards World could be more affordable."

"You have to pay for a license, and the license cost is calculated based on the number of users you have."

"The solution is expensive and is best-suited for large enterprises."

"Licensing can vary, but for educational institutions, there are often favorable conditions."

"There is a license needed to use this solution."

"SAP ERP is an expensive tool."

"I rate the product's price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap or affordable, and ten is really expensive. The solution is expensive."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. SAP ERP is a costly tool."

"The solution is expensive so I rate cost a five out of ten."

"It is less expensive than its competitors."

More SAP ERP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Government

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	30
Large Enterprise	76

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JD Edwards World?

The most valuable feature for me is the traceability customization, which allows me to track the movement and history of artifacts in our ecosystem.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JD Edwards World?

The user interface in JD Edwards World is very crude; I press a button to get to the application, unlike EnterpriseOne, which offers a more finished experience with dashboards. Other software like ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JD Edwards World?

Right now, I am working with one of the home builder technologies. JD Edwards World ( /products/jd-edwards-world-reviews ) is being used as a part of job costing. There are multiple interfaces wher...

See all answers

Is Anaplan better than SAP ERP?

There are different aspects of both Anaplan and SAP ERP that I like and dislike. Anaplan improves forecast accuracy and drives up the quality of analytics. Rather than spending all of their time co...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP ERP?

The solution has made the most significant impact on our human resources function, specifically in HR operations and HR analytics. One feature of SAP ERP that I found most valuable is its use of co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP ERP?

SAP ERP is fine as it is at the moment. It is difficult to comment on improvements for this version. I know HANA has improved regarding user interface and other functions, but we don't use that par...

See all answers

Comparisons

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs JD Edwards World

Compared 35% of the time

Pronto Xi vs JD Edwards World

Compared 18% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs JD Edwards World

Compared 11% of the time

Epicor LumberTrack vs JD Edwards World

Compared 9% of the time

More JD Edwards World Competitors

Infor M3 vs SAP ERP

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs SAP ERP

Compared 11% of the time

Infor LN vs SAP ERP

Compared 10% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs SAP ERP

Compared 10% of the time

Anaplan vs SAP ERP

Compared 10% of the time

More SAP ERP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards World

September 2025

Download JD Edwards World product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP ERP

August 2025

Download SAP ERP product report

Overview

Oracle's JD Edwards World single platform solution enables better collaboration both within and outside your business network. Get all of your lines of business working together sharing information, boosting performance, trimming costs, and driving profitable growth. ERP Suite.

Oracle

SAP ERP addresses the core business software requirements of midsize and large organizations in all industries and sectors. SAP ERP includes four individual solutions that support key areas of enterprise resource planning: human capital management, financials, operations, corporate services.

SAP

Sample Customers

SICIM S.p.A., Fabbrica d'Armi Pietro Beretta S.p.A, Atrium European Real Estate, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Calumet Specialty Partners, LP Products, Grupo Arcor, Original BUFF S.A., Shelf Drilling Ltd., African + Eastern, Westfield Group LLC, Sportmaster Ltd., Beijing Xinladao Restaurant Group

B&G Manufacturing, Unilever, Life is good Inc., Joy Global Inc., City of Cape Town, Bhopal Municipal, Corporation (BMC), adidas Group, Butcher & Packer Supply Company, Franklin Valve L.P., Evoshield, Prime Meats, a Norsan Group company, EMC Corporation, Varian Medical Systems Inc., FC Bayern Mªnchen AG, AkzoNobel Chemicals B.V., T¾V Rheinland, Pacific Drilling S.A., Fire & Rescue New South Wales, University of Amsterdam, Pa_alon S.A.

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards World vs. SAP ERP

September 2025

Free Report: JD Edwards World vs. SAP ERP

Find out what your peers are saying about JD Edwards World vs. SAP ERP and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JD Edwards World vs. SAP ERP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.