Infraon IMS vs New Relic comparison

Read 174 New Relic reviews

18,652 Views
5,223 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

New Relic and Infraon IMS both compete in the field of IT monitoring solutions. New Relic seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive application and server monitoring capabilities, making it more suitable for environments requiring deep insights.

Features: New Relic provides detailed application and server monitoring, real-time transaction monitoring, SLA metrics, and alerting systems. It supports APM Synthetics and Blazemeter for SQL transactions and application performance insights. Users can share monitoring setups for collaboration. Infraon IMS offers a consolidated view for network monitoring, detailed dashboard interactions, and role-based access. It provides real-time availability insights into infrastructure but lacks depth in the application layer monitoring that New Relic offers.

Room for Improvement: New Relic could improve data privacy controls, offer more granular alert customizations, and address complex pricing tiers. Infraon IMS could benefit from AI-driven insights, an enhanced GUI, and improved reporting capabilities. It also needs better integration with non-IP-based devices and clearer licensing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: New Relic is designed for cloud environments with support for public and hybrid cloud deployments. Customers find its documentation helpful and support responsive, though there's a call for real-time communication options. Infraon IMS is effective in controlled on-premises and private cloud environments, with good customer service and technical support. The need for support is rare, indicating a stable deployment experience.

Pricing and ROI: New Relic's pricing model can be steep for smaller businesses or high data volumes but is justified by its features depth. There's a strong call for more flexible pricing options, though it provides good ROI through improved application performance and reduced debugging times. Infraon IMS has budget-friendly pricing, making it attractive for smaller setups needing essential monitoring capabilities. Its licensing is reasonable and customizable based on feature selection, offering cost-effective solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Infraon IMS vs. New Relic Report (Updated: May 2026).

Infraon IMS vs. New Relic

Download the complete report

Helped 895,151 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infraon IMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

84th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

57th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

47th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (33rd)

New Relic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

9th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

174

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (4th), IT Operations Analytics (3rd), Mobile APM (3rd), AIOps (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of New Relic is 1.4%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
New Relic	1.4%
Infraon IMS	0.5%
Other	98.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

it_user1631601

GTM Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Our process efficiency has improved by having all the information in one place, which has reduced manpower

The product is great. We integrated the ticketing tool with the monitoring tool. The agent ID creation is very easy when using this tool. It is so user-friendly. The user interface is good and also the pricing is great. The user interface is good, even a business user or layman can raise a ticket. They provide an all-in-one monitoring tool. If an issue happens, it gets integrated with the email, then proactively that ticket is being raised, which is good. The reporting is good. It is very clear. It is a customized report; however you want it, you can customize it. We use the solution’s role-based dashboards. The head of IT wants to use it so he can see holistically what is happening, e.g., what are the tickets being raised, what is a major issue, and what escalations are happening. There are different dashboards that are customized. For our head of IT, we made a separate dashboard. Then, for the executives, we made a separate dashboard based on time, like hourly or daily. All these reports were customized. While they didn't provide a BI dashboard, they provide a kind of graphical dashboard for whatever the issue is. Once you click on a particular ticket, it drills down to the issue, what it is and when the issue was raised. The drill down is good. It is more like a business intelligence (BI) tool. You can just scroll and zoom in. It goes deep into the issue. Once you click a particular dashboard, it will take you to the next page, then it takes you to the issue. Infraon IMS provides workflow automation for real-world use cases. This makes our work easier. It is just drag and drop (no coding) to build the workflows. For example, a particular ticket is being raised. It gets routed to three important IT executives within our team. From our team, it gets routed to the next level. The learning curve is good. Initially, there were no issues. As soon as the users saw the product, they understood what the product was. There wasn't any kind of training required for this product because it is very straightforward.

Read full review

BasilJiji

System Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Real-time alerts have reduced server outage impact and support fast incident response

In the dashboard, if they could show a little more metrics regarding the application and related things, that would be how New Relic could be improved. Currently, there are things showing from the server level and application level, but it can be improved. That is what I felt. Regarding user interface, I do not feel much concern, but for some kind of issues when we are trying to get support from the New Relic team, their SLA seems to be long. They are taking seven to ten working days for resolving some kind of scenario or issue. That is a bit difficult for us. If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful. When it comes to the customer support part, I felt they need to be a little more improved on that part. The support overall is good, but they can improve. That is the reason I have given it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, it's a wonderful one-stop ITSM solution for infrastructure."

"It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"Once we installed this central system, our site engineers who provide the data started believing in the data's accuracy."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product."

"With Infraon, everything is already built-in so you are able to plug-and-play with the system."

"We have definitely seen ROI since we first implemented Infraon, three years ago, as it has given us clarity and helped us with compliance during audits."

"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."

More Infraon IMS pros

"The best features New Relic offers are end-to-end tracing of any calls and custom dashboards."

"New Relic has positively impacted our organization by reducing errors, improving performance, and saving time."

"The thing that's nice about New Relic is it doesn't try and do everything, it does what it does."

"Their technical support is pretty good and responsive. We have a real good relationship with them."

"I find the error monitoring of IIS web applications to be extremely useful."

"The monitoring so far has been good and we are happy with it."

"New Relic helped with the mean time to detection, the MTDD metric tracked for applications, where the detection capability enabled a reduction from around 20 to 30 minutes down to three minutes, which has been really helpful in terms of detecting issues as well as helping to triage and troubleshoot issues faster, creating a positive impact on the organization."

"It has helped my organization to dive deeper into the application using the APM module is very helpful."

More New Relic pros

Cons

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."

"In terms of improvements, I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk."

More Infraon IMS cons

"It constantly aggregates data so it’s not a true indication of how our application is doing."

"The pricing model. New Relic can be expensive for growing startups."

"The connectivity between legacy and newer cloud applications is not great."

"I would like to be able to invest less time in IT and ad hocs. We should be concentrating on other issues."

"In Alert History, while you can see the trending in response time by Request Queuing, .NER CLR and Database, if you had the ability to see which transaction type was the slowest during the timeframe when the critical error occurred by displaying the info within the same “tool tip” hover window which currently gives me the time per request and number of transactions, i.e., if it had the additional correlation information of “StatusCode/403” which you can get from the Events Errors hover."

"Errors insights have room for improvement especially error analysis part which is somewhat less compared to similar tool Splunk."

"Some of our customers see New Relic as a promising product to have, and we would like to deliver it to them. The only way we would be able to do that would be if we had server appliance for clients that we could install in their data centres."

"Alerting based on custom insights queries. If I set a custom query to give me some value, I want to be able to set an alert for that."

More New Relic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"I loved this product, but we can no longer afford it, so we dropped it."

"The price of New Relic could improve. It is expensive."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one means cheap, and ten means very expensive."

"The pricing is okay comparatively their competitors. The only concern was whether it should be purchased on demand or bring your own license, and which way passes some savings onto the end customers."

"The detection piece of it brings us a big return on investment."

"The pricing model is a little confusing for beginners. They find it a little expensive, and if you are using it already, then that is not good."

"I recommend using the free version of New Relic. If you like the free version and understand its importance for your company, you can move to the trial. Then, you can migrate to the paid version."

"We spend somewhere around $5,000 to $6,000 per month with an annual recommitment of maybe $60,000. These are just ballpark figures."

More New Relic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

895,151 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	65
Midsize Enterprise	51
Large Enterprise	78

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

What do you like most about New Relic Insights?

The product's initial setup phase was very easy.

What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?

I have noticed discrepancies between New Relic's documentation and Terraform resources. For example, there have been instances where new features launched in the New Relic UI have not been updated ...

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Compared 5% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Infraon IMS

Compared 4% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Dynatrace vs New Relic

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs New Relic

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs New Relic

Compared 4% of the time

Elastic Observability vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

Azure Monitor vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

More New Relic Competitors

Product Reports

Infraon IMS

Download Infraon IMS product report

Download New Relic product report

Also Known As

Everest IMS

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM

Overview

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

New Relic offers real-time application monitoring and insight into performance bottlenecks. Its customizable dashboards and APM integration provide efficient operational support, while server performance alerts ensure quick issue detection.

New Relic provides comprehensive monitoring of application performance, tracking bottlenecks across databases and front-end components. Users employ it for server and infrastructure monitoring, as well as analyzing key metrics such as CPU and memory usage. The solution's ability to integrate with tools like PagerDuty enhances incident management capabilities. However, users have expressed a need for improvements in query language simplicity, more detailed historical insights, and better mobile app monitoring support.

What are New Relic's most important features?

Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant visibility into application performance.
Detailed Transaction Tracing: Identifies specific transaction issues quickly.
Error Rate Tracking: Monitors and reports on error occurrences efficiently.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors dashboard views for specific needs.
APM Integration: Seamlessly integrates with application performance management tools.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Operational Efficiency: Quick issue detection reduces downtime.
Improved Debugging: Enhanced error analysis supports rapid problem resolution.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Offers a holistic view of application performance and user behavior.
Incident Management: Integration with incident tools helps streamline responses.
Efficient Alerts: Rapid alert systems ensure timely notifications of issues.

In industries like e-commerce and financial services, New Relic supports application performance monitoring to enhance user experience and system reliability. Organizations leverage its insights for optimizing performance, particularly in server operations and infrastructure management. Its ability to monitor API failures through synthetic monitoring is crucial for maintaining high service levels.

Sample Customers

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club

Infraon IMS vs. New Relic