IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal comparison

IBM and SAP are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #19. IBM holds a 1.6% mindshare in AIS, compared to SAP’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Read 13 IBM WebSphere Message Broker reviews

287 Views
60 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Po...

Read 3 SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal reviews

365 Views
96 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Po...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

IBM WebSphere Message Broker and SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal both operate in the enterprise data management and user interaction category. SAP NetWeaver appears to have the upper hand with its feature-rich environment and cost effectiveness, contrasting with IBM’s integration prowess.

Features: IBM WebSphere Message Broker supports robust message routing, transformation, and diverse protocol management, making it ideal for complex system architectures. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal offers tools for collaboration, application integration, and enhanced end-user interaction capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM WebSphere Message Broker requires a more complex deployment process, demanding specialized expertise and longer implementation times, but benefits from strong technical support. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal offers a simpler deployment process, reducing setup time with effective customer support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere Message Broker involves higher setup costs but promises significant ROI with enhanced integration and operational efficiency. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal offers a more cost-effective upfront pricing model, though its ROI is seen as moderate compared to its feature set, providing better immediate value.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (8th)

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Po...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere Message Broker is 1.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

BrajendraKumar

Technical Architect at HCL Technologies

Offers large-sized business information processing with a time-saving setup and impressive stability

I primarily use two previews of the product for Dev and two for QA as part of the production process. Whatever tools our company is using, the cost of a license in IBM WebSphere Message Broker is about 80% of all these software or tools. The message routing capabilities satisfy workflow efficiency. The product supports message formats of XML, JSON, and SSID, which are around 24 KB to 50 KB in size. The solution supports communication protocols like STTP and TCP. Features like DataGraph need to be introduced in IBM WebSphere Message Broker. Some of the clients of our organization are using an outdated version of IBM WebSphere Message Broker for which the vendor doesn't provide direct support anymore. For the aforementioned version, our company professionals can solve the queries on their own without seeking support from IBM. During the installation of a prior version of IBM WebSphere Message Broker, sometimes I have to configure the failovers through the cluster, where issues arise, and I often seek help from the support team. The solution is being used by some medicine companies in our organization that receive sales orders from the EDR or JDE. I would not recommend the product to others as its becoming obsolete and they can rather choose a middleware solution from Amazon or Azure. But I would overall rate the product a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Anand_Kumar

Enterprise Architect at DXC Technology

The UI makes the setup easy to do from anywhere

Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time. Fixing this will help the customer and help to meet their expectations. SAP needs to come up with a standardized version of NetWeaver. The solution is good on the internal side, but not so much from the client perspective when they view it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy."

"Performance-wise, this solution is really good."

"Straightforward development and deployment."

"It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format."

"IBM WebSphere Message Broker is one of the best middleware solutions"

"It's reliable for our day-to-day operations, ensuring fast and secure data integration across different systems."

"Message Broker is valuable because most of the applications are using MQ. Even in my current engagement, the few applications which I audit to onboard the bank are using MQ."

"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere Message Broker is the ability to facilitate communication with legacy systems, offering a multitude of great capabilities. For example, if there is a mainframe system in place with a web service serving as the front end. In that case, the solution enables efficient protocol transformations to convert all request payloads into a format that the legacy systems can accept, rendering the integration and transformation processes seamless and highly effective."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker pros

"They integrated it with the SAP router."

"Workflow functionality and internal portal capabilities are the most important features."

"From the use of this solution, we have been able to establish better processes and have greater management of our company."

"Internal workflow approval around ESS and MSS leave days, capex approval as well as internal communication to the business have improved the way my organization functions."

Cons

"Stability and pricing are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

"The product's features are not being upgraded or enhanced by the vendor"

"I know that Message Broker was a very tightly copied product with another IBM product, that is, IBM MQ. I would like to have a little bit more decoupling from the IBM MQ because it should not be a prerequisite for IBM WebSphere Message Broker usage."

"The solution can add container engines such as docker."

"Today I probably wouldn't go for Message Broker because of the cost structure, support, and the whole ecosystem around IBM."

"The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is."

"Technical support is good but they could have a better response time."

"Technical support is very slow and needs to be improved."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker cons

"Due to our business, some setups were very complex."

"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly."

"We encountered stability issues, especially on external functionality around its RFP capabilities."

"Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time. Fixing this will help the customer and help to meet their expectations."

"External portal functionality with suppliers and customers needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is more expensive than competing products."

"The solution is expensive."

"I feel with IBM, when you want certain functions or features, you have to continuously purchase add-ons. There are always additional fees."

"The solution is expensive."

"The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives."

"The licensing cost of IBM WebSphere Message Broker needs to be reduced"

"IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time."

"IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost."

"SAP is not for every business. It depends on what is required. SAP is always going to be expensive."

"The cost of this solution is high."

"Because India is so competitive in the IT world, people will start to move away from SAP's pricing because they have a market monopoly. Soon, they will start losing the monopoly part to open source and other things. I don't think their monopoly will run for more than three to four years because people are getting away from these monopolies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

24%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Recruiting/Hr Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

There could be greater flexibility and agility in service creation for the product. As our business requirements evolve, we require more dynamic capabilities to adapt and scale our services accordi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 49% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 17% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 13% of the time

Mule ESB vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 11% of the time

IBM BPM vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 10% of the time

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Competitors

IBM DataPower Gateway vs SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal

Compared 50% of the time

Apache Web Server vs SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal

Compared 50% of the time

More SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

June 2025

Download IBM WebSphere Message Broker product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

June 2025

Download SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal product report

Also Known As

WebSphere Message Broker

NetWeaver Enterprise Portal, SAP Portal

Overview

WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.

IBM

SAP Enterprise Portal allows to create attractive corporate portals that leverage the responsive SAP Fiori launchpad experience. The portal is the Web front-end component for SAP NetWeaver, the comprehensive integration and application platform that facilitates the alignment of people, information, and business processes across organizational and technical boundaries. It's ideal for organizations who require access to many applications and services across system landscapes, especially across JAVA and ABAP-based landscapes. The portal offers a single point of access to SAP and non-SAP information sources, enterprise applications, information repositories, databases and services, in and outside your organization. The portal can be accessed from desktops and from mobile devices, it can provide with the tools to manage and analyze its information resources, and to share and collaborate. With its role-based content, and personalization features, the portal enables users - from employees and customers to partners and suppliers - to focus exclusively on data relevant to daily decision-making processes. The technology and architecture of the portal ensures it is built for the enterprise, providing a secure and scalable environment.

SAP

Sample Customers

WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin Tire

Alliander N.V.

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal

June 2025

Free Report: IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.