IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs IIS comparison

IBM and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM holds a 1.5% mindshare in AIS, compared to Microsoft’s 12.0% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Read 13 IBM WebSphere Message Broker reviews

300 Views
244 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

IIS

Read 56 IIS reviews

2,756 Views
2,058 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

IIS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

IBM WebSphere Message Broker and IIS compete in enterprise technology infrastructure, with WebSphere excelling in integration and IIS in web server management. WebSphere holds an advantage in complex integration scenarios, whereas IIS is favored for web hosting efficiency and ease of use.

Features: IBM WebSphere Message Broker facilitates extensive enterprise integration with support for various messaging protocols and IT environments. It offers robust capabilities for complex system connectivity and transformation processes. IIS provides comprehensive web server management, integrating seamlessly with Windows applications. Its user-friendly interface and efficient resource management make it ideal for web-centric deployments.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere Message Broker could improve its initial setup process, offering simpler onboarding for new users. Its pricing model might deter smaller enterprises. Enhanced user interface for streamlined operations would also be beneficial. IIS could strengthen its integration capabilities beyond Microsoft products. Security enhancements could further bolster its reliability. Offering more detailed documentation for advanced configurations would aid less experienced users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IIS offers a streamlined deployment process within the Windows ecosystem, making it highly accessible. Microsoft provides well-established support due to the product's widespread use. IBM WebSphere Message Broker involves a more complex setup but offers specialized support for its intricate deployments, ensuring comprehensive guidance for users.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere Message Broker involves higher initial costs, reflecting its advanced integration capabilities, offering substantial ROI for enterprises with extensive connectivity needs. In contrast, IIS provides a cost-effective solution for efficient web hosting, ensuring quick ROI for businesses prioritizing straightforward web solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (8th)

IIS

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere Message Broker is 1.5%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IIS is 12.0%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

BrajendraKumar

Technical Architect at HCL Technologies

Offers large-sized business information processing with a time-saving setup and impressive stability

I primarily use two previews of the product for Dev and two for QA as part of the production process. Whatever tools our company is using, the cost of a license in IBM WebSphere Message Broker is about 80% of all these software or tools. The message routing capabilities satisfy workflow efficiency. The product supports message formats of XML, JSON, and SSID, which are around 24 KB to 50 KB in size. The solution supports communication protocols like STTP and TCP. Features like DataGraph need to be introduced in IBM WebSphere Message Broker. Some of the clients of our organization are using an outdated version of IBM WebSphere Message Broker for which the vendor doesn't provide direct support anymore. For the aforementioned version, our company professionals can solve the queries on their own without seeking support from IBM. During the installation of a prior version of IBM WebSphere Message Broker, sometimes I have to configure the failovers through the cluster, where issues arise, and I often seek help from the support team. The solution is being used by some medicine companies in our organization that receive sales orders from the EDR or JDE. I would not recommend the product to others as its becoming obsolete and they can rather choose a middleware solution from Amazon or Azure. But I would overall rate the product a nine out of ten.

Read full review

DanielWildermuth

Testtool expert at Helvetia Versicherungen

Provides integration with Eggplant but problems with stability

We use Windows Server only for Eggplant Manager. Otherwise, I'm not using it At the moment, we have big problems with stability, and I'm not very happy at the moment. So, the stability could be improved. I have been using it for a few years. The initial setup is complex. We have an…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The transactions and message queuing are the most valuable features of the solution."

"The solution has good integration."

"The documentation, performance, stability and scalability of the tool are valuable."

"Integration and mapping are easy, which is a major advantage."

"We only use the basic features, but the most valuable one for us is the Publish-subscribe pattern."

"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere Message Broker is the ability to facilitate communication with legacy systems, offering a multitude of great capabilities. For example, if there is a mainframe system in place with a web service serving as the front end. In that case, the solution enables efficient protocol transformations to convert all request payloads into a format that the legacy systems can accept, rendering the integration and transformation processes seamless and highly effective."

"IBM WebSphere Message Broker is one of the best middleware solutions"

"It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker pros

"IIS works natively with Windows Server without any issues in publishing certificates."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"It is a scalable solution."

"It is a lightweight web host that is easy to configure for simple webpages."

"IIS's best features are its management console and stability."

"The most valuable feature of IIS is it does not consume a lot of resources. It does not consume a lot of resources, such as memory."

"The initial setup is simple."

"IIS has a very simple and user-friendly interface, which helps a lot in effective and efficient management."

More IIS pros

Cons

"There is some lag in the GUI. There have been some performance issues and maybe it's because of the application data."

"The solution can add container engines such as docker."

"The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is."

"Technical support is very slow and needs to be improved."

"Technical support is good but they could have a better response time."

"The images and size of the containers are too big and I think that they should be more lightweight."

"As our business requirements evolve, we require more dynamic capabilities to adapt and scale our services accordingly."

"Today I probably wouldn't go for Message Broker because of the cost structure, support, and the whole ecosystem around IBM."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker cons

"The cost is a bit too high."

"There is an issue with the network. The tool's price is also high."

"IIS has some stability issues and needs restarting."

"The visibility feature of the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"We've never had any issues with the solution, but it's still nice to have overall improvements on it. It could be easier and faster to use, for example."

"If Microsoft IIS could work well with AppOptics or things like PHP, Python, and other custom languages that run on the webserver, it would be ideal. I think there are cases where people need to use Apache instead of IIS when IIS doesn't work well with other web languages."

"Sometimes if you are using IIS in large-scale scenarios, meaning that if you are deploying an application within IIS service and you are expecting a large number of users to use this application, you can sometimes find some problems, meaning that the service can shut down by itself unexpectedly if you don't configure your IIS with the correct configuration that can handle this number of users."

"The only issue I've encountered is with certificates not working fine sometimes."

More IIS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time."

"IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost."

"I feel with IBM, when you want certain functions or features, you have to continuously purchase add-ons. There are always additional fees."

"The solution is expensive."

"The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives."

"This product is more expensive than competing products."

"The licensing cost of IBM WebSphere Message Broker needs to be reduced"

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"The price of Windows Server IIS is expensive. They have a large user base, and they charge a little bit too much."

"IIS's pricing is reasonable."

"There is no license required for the product as it is role-based. Whenever you go for a Windows platform server, the role has to be installed directly from the server manager. There is no additional cost that has to be paid for that. It is free to use."

"I didn't need to get an additional license for the solution since it was included in my server."

"I was using the trial version of IIS inside my virtual machines."

"The product's price is not high."

"The solution provides multiple licensing options."

More IIS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

There could be greater flexibility and agility in service creation for the product. As our business requirements evolve, we require more dynamic capabilities to adapt and scale our services accordi...

See all answers

Which is better - IIS or NGINX Plus?

IIS is a flexible, secure, and manageable web server to host anything on the web. IIS’s scalable and open architecture can handle the most demanding tasks. From media streaming to web applications,...

See all answers

What do you like most about IIS?

The product is flexible.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IIS?

If you have a Windows license, there is no additional cost for IIS. However, you may need to pay for SSL publishing at times.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 48% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 20% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 12% of the time

Mule ESB vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 11% of the time

IBM BPM vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Competitors

NGINX Plus vs IIS

Compared 29% of the time

Apache Web Server vs IIS

Compared 25% of the time

Oracle WebLogic Server vs IIS

Compared 15% of the time

Tomcat vs IIS

Compared 14% of the time

JBoss vs IIS

Compared 6% of the time

More IIS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

April 2025

Download IBM WebSphere Message Broker product report

Buyer's Guide

IIS

April 2025

Download IIS product report

Also Known As

WebSphere Message Broker

Windows Server IIS

Overview

WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.

IBM

Internet Information Services (IIS) provides a secure, easy-to-manage, modular and extensible platform for reliably hosting websites, services and applications. With IIS, you get choice and control without giving up reliability or security.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin Tire

Erste Bank Group, NJVC, Samsung Electronics, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe, Urban Software Institute

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS

April 2025

Free Report: IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.