IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs IIS comparison

IBM and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9. IBM holds a 1.6% mindshare in AIS, compared to Microsoft’s 11.5% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Read 13 IBM WebSphere Message Broker reviews

287 Views
60 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

IIS

Read 57 IIS reviews

2,297 Views
811 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

IIS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

IBM WebSphere Message Broker and IIS compete in enterprise technology infrastructure, with WebSphere excelling in integration and IIS in web server management. WebSphere holds an advantage in complex integration scenarios, whereas IIS is favored for web hosting efficiency and ease of use.

Features: IBM WebSphere Message Broker facilitates extensive enterprise integration with support for various messaging protocols and IT environments. It offers robust capabilities for complex system connectivity and transformation processes. IIS provides comprehensive web server management, integrating seamlessly with Windows applications. Its user-friendly interface and efficient resource management make it ideal for web-centric deployments.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere Message Broker could improve its initial setup process, offering simpler onboarding for new users. Its pricing model might deter smaller enterprises. Enhanced user interface for streamlined operations would also be beneficial. IIS could strengthen its integration capabilities beyond Microsoft products. Security enhancements could further bolster its reliability. Offering more detailed documentation for advanced configurations would aid less experienced users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IIS offers a streamlined deployment process within the Windows ecosystem, making it highly accessible. Microsoft provides well-established support due to the product's widespread use. IBM WebSphere Message Broker involves a more complex setup but offers specialized support for its intricate deployments, ensuring comprehensive guidance for users.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere Message Broker involves higher initial costs, reflecting its advanced integration capabilities, offering substantial ROI for enterprises with extensive connectivity needs. In contrast, IIS provides a cost-effective solution for efficient web hosting, ensuring quick ROI for businesses prioritizing straightforward web solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (8th)

IIS

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere Message Broker is 1.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IIS is 11.5%, down from 13.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

BrajendraKumar

Technical Architect at HCL Technologies

Offers large-sized business information processing with a time-saving setup and impressive stability

I primarily use two previews of the product for Dev and two for QA as part of the production process. Whatever tools our company is using, the cost of a license in IBM WebSphere Message Broker is about 80% of all these software or tools. The message routing capabilities satisfy workflow efficiency. The product supports message formats of XML, JSON, and SSID, which are around 24 KB to 50 KB in size. The solution supports communication protocols like STTP and TCP. Features like DataGraph need to be introduced in IBM WebSphere Message Broker. Some of the clients of our organization are using an outdated version of IBM WebSphere Message Broker for which the vendor doesn't provide direct support anymore. For the aforementioned version, our company professionals can solve the queries on their own without seeking support from IBM. During the installation of a prior version of IBM WebSphere Message Broker, sometimes I have to configure the failovers through the cluster, where issues arise, and I often seek help from the support team. The solution is being used by some medicine companies in our organization that receive sales orders from the EDR or JDE. I would not recommend the product to others as its becoming obsolete and they can rather choose a middleware solution from Amazon or Azure. But I would overall rate the product a nine out of ten.

Read full review

DanielWildermuth

Testtool expert at Helvetia Versicherungen

Provides integration with Eggplant but problems with stability

We use Windows Server only for Eggplant Manager. Otherwise, I'm not using it At the moment, we have big problems with stability, and I'm not very happy at the moment. So, the stability could be improved. I have been using it for a few years. The initial setup is complex. We have an…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's reliable for our day-to-day operations, ensuring fast and secure data integration across different systems."

"It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy."

"It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format."

"The transactions and message queuing are the most valuable features of the solution."

"We only use the basic features, but the most valuable one for us is the Publish-subscribe pattern."

"Performance-wise, this solution is really good."

"Integration and mapping are easy, which is a major advantage."

"The solution has good integration."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker pros

"It is a lightweight web host that is easy to configure for simple webpages."

"The solution is easy to use."

"IIS's most valuable feature is user-friendliness."

"IIS is quite easy to set up as it comes pre-configured, so I don't have to install anything."

"We use the solution for our customer's web applications."

"The most valuable feature of IIS is the database it provides."

"It's good and offers good usability."

"The interface, simplicity, and ease of management are all good features that make this user-friendly."

More IIS pros

Cons

"The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is."

"Technical support is good but they could have a better response time."

"It is currently a weighty product."

"As our business requirements evolve, we require more dynamic capabilities to adapt and scale our services accordingly."

"Today I probably wouldn't go for Message Broker because of the cost structure, support, and the whole ecosystem around IBM."

"There is some lag in the GUI. There have been some performance issues and maybe it's because of the application data."

"Technical support is very slow and needs to be improved."

"I know that Message Broker was a very tightly copied product with another IBM product, that is, IBM MQ. I would like to have a little bit more decoupling from the IBM MQ because it should not be a prerequisite for IBM WebSphere Message Broker usage."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker cons

"The areas of this solution that need improvement are monitoring, debugging, and troubleshooting."

"Scalability issues and security concerns need attention from Microsoft."

"The solution's stability needs improvement."

"Occasionally, we encounter performance issues with IIS where it becomes unresponsive and requires a solution restart."

"The tool needs to improve its performance."

"The documentation is not very detailed. They need to improve it and add to it. They should ensure there are lots of visuals to help users better understand the solution."

"The product could be more compatible with Linux and macOS, particularly when applying user configuration policies."

"IIS could improve the error logging. There are times we are not able to see the errors. More details would be helpful. Additionally, the configuring of the IIS should be allowed through coding instead of the classic view."

More IIS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives."

"IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost."

"IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time."

"I feel with IBM, when you want certain functions or features, you have to continuously purchase add-ons. There are always additional fees."

"The solution is expensive."

"This product is more expensive than competing products."

"The licensing cost of IBM WebSphere Message Broker needs to be reduced"

"The cost for IIS is already included in Windows services. We don't have to pay anything extra."

"This solution comes included with Windows Server."

"I give the price of the solution a five out of ten."

"There is an annual license to use this solution and the price could be better."

"The tool is included with Windows."

"Users can get a subscription-based license or a perpetual license for IIS."

"It is licensed with your Windows installation which makes it relatively cheap if you already have a Windows Server sitting around."

"The licensing cost is dependent on the usage."

More IIS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

There could be greater flexibility and agility in service creation for the product. As our business requirements evolve, we require more dynamic capabilities to adapt and scale our services accordi...

See all answers

Which is better - IIS or NGINX Plus?

IIS is a flexible, secure, and manageable web server to host anything on the web. IIS’s scalable and open architecture can handle the most demanding tasks. From media streaming to web applications,...

See all answers

What do you like most about IIS?

The product is flexible.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IIS?

If you have a Windows license, there is no additional cost for IIS. However, you may need to pay for SSL publishing at times.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 49% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 17% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 13% of the time

Mule ESB vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 11% of the time

IBM BPM vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 10% of the time

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Competitors

NGINX Plus vs IIS

Compared 27% of the time

Apache Web Server vs IIS

Compared 27% of the time

Oracle WebLogic Server vs IIS

Compared 14% of the time

Tomcat vs IIS

Compared 14% of the time

JBoss vs IIS

Compared 5% of the time

More IIS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

June 2025

Download IBM WebSphere Message Broker product report

Buyer's Guide

IIS

June 2025

Download IIS product report

Also Known As

WebSphere Message Broker

Windows Server IIS

Overview

WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.

IBM

Internet Information Services (IIS) provides a secure, easy-to-manage, modular and extensible platform for reliably hosting websites, services and applications. With IIS, you get choice and control without giving up reliability or security.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin Tire

Erste Bank Group, NJVC, Samsung Electronics, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe, Urban Software Institute

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS

June 2025

Free Report: IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.