We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere Message Broker and IIS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"Performance-wise, this solution is really good."
"Message Broker is valuable because most of the applications are using MQ. Even in my current engagement, the few applications which I audit to onboard the bank are using MQ."
"Straightforward development and deployment."
"Integration and mapping are easy, which is a major advantage."
"The initial setup of IIS is easy. The process takes only five minutes."
"Windows Server IIS is stable."
"IIS has a very simple and user-friendly interface, which helps a lot in effective and efficient management."
"The most valuable feature of IIS is it does not consume a lot of resources. It does not consume a lot of resources, such as memory."
"The images and size of the containers are too big and I think that they should be more lightweight."
"Today I probably wouldn't go for Message Broker because of the cost structure, support, and the whole ecosystem around IBM."
"Technical support is good but they could have a better response time."
"There is some lag in the GUI. There have been some performance issues and maybe it's because of the application data."
"I am using an older version of Windows Server IIS and the general management and navigation to get something done is not as straightforward as I hope it to be. The interface could be improved."
"IIS could improve the error logging. There are times we are not able to see the errors. More details would be helpful. Additionally, the configuring of the IIS should be allowed through coding instead of the classic view."
"IIS could improve by having some features related to ASR and HTTPS certificate generation."
"Having no support for other than a Microsoft environment and programming languages limits the usage of IIS in many cases."
IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 7th in Application Infrastructure with 4 reviews while IIS is ranked 6th in Application Infrastructure with 4 reviews. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 7.0, while IIS is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Message Broker writes "Easy to setup and deploy, with easy mapping, and it integrates well with MQ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IIS writes "Simple and user-friendly interface, good integration, and easy to implement". IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, IBM BPM, Mule ESB and Red Hat Fuse, whereas IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Tomcat, Oracle WebLogic Server and Windows Server AppFabric. See our IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
