We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."It facilitated the streamlined scheduling process by amalgamating inputs from various sources, including location data and other systems."
"I like that ASP.NET is used for the framework and the core web services."
"The most valuable feature is the financial accounting."
"The most valuable features for us are web frameworks like MVC, Web API, and WCS."
"The .NET Framework is easier to use because it provides a wide range of libraries."
"If we take low code, no code platform such as RPA platforms, you might end up writing 100 lines of code and you might do it in a single line of code using. NET."
"The most valuable thing about Microsoft .NET Framework is that it is an enterprise-grade language and platform."
"Initial setup is straightforward. All the components are readily available."
"Workflow functionality and internal portal capabilities are the most important features."
"They integrated it with the SAP router."
"From the use of this solution, we have been able to establish better processes and have greater management of our company."
"Internal workflow approval around ESS and MSS leave days, capex approval as well as internal communication to the business have improved the way my organization functions."
"Better integration with other tools to make the operation faster would be an improvement."
"The integration capability of the product with AI is an area with certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."
"The initial setup is complex."
"In the realm of Microsoft .NET Framework, particularly in the C# language, there have been significant developments that I find highly commendable. I am genuinely fascinated by the continuous evolution of the language, and staying abreast of the latest features in Azure is both challenging and enjoyable. Working with C# in Azure is particularly fantastic. I appreciate in .NET, as compared to Java, is the enforcement of types, providing a better experience in terms of technicalities. Additionally, the introduction of Roslyn in the past few years has brought about the concept of late .NET, which I find interesting and powerful. This allows for the transformation of symbolic code just before execution, eliminating the runtime decision-making process and enhancing efficiency. However, late .NET does come with a drawback – a delay in the last-minute computation when starting an executable. While some may find this less appealing in terms of instant responsiveness, especially in serverless cloud environments, the efficiency gained from executing strictly binary code is valuable. Despite potential drawbacks like the time required for activation, I view .NET favorably for its technical advancements and efficiency, especially in scenarios such as serverless cloud computing. It's essential to recognize the intricacies of how .NET processes code and the efficiency it brings, which some may overlook."
"This solution is best used with some training."
"The solution has difficulty integrating with other products. There are no such difficulties if you have the same platform, hardware, and operating system."
"Microsoft .NET Framework has a steep learning curve, which could be improved."
"In the next release, I am looking for more advanced technologies such as socket communication and enhanced features like realtime chat with the clients."
"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly."
"Due to our business, some setups were very complex."
"External portal functionality with suppliers and customers needs improvement."
"We encountered stability issues, especially on external functionality around its RFP capabilities."
"Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time. Fixing this will help the customer and help to meet their expectations."
More SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 44 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is ranked 20th in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "A very reliable and near-universal framework for app development". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal writes "The UI makes the setup easy to do from anywhere". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, Apache Web Server, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and NGINX Plus, whereas SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, IIS, IBM DataPower Gateway and IBM WebSphere Application Server.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.