Apache Web Server vs SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal comparison

Apache and SAP are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Apache is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8, while SAP is ranked #19. Apache holds a 11.2% mindshare in AIS, compared to SAP’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Apache Web Server

Read 23 Apache Web Server reviews

1,640 Views
1,640 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Po...

Read 3 SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal reviews

360 Views
342 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache Web Server

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Po...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal and Apache Web Server both serve as platforms with distinct purposes. Apache Web Server seems superior due to its flexibility, modular design, and broad compatibility.

Features: SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal offers integrated enterprise solutions, seamless connectivity across business applications, and coordination across diverse tools. Apache Web Server provides versatility, a modular design, and extensive customization, suitable for developers seeking an adaptable solution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal requires a complex setup and benefits from specialized enterprise-level support channels. Apache Web Server offers a straightforward deployment process, ideal for teams able to manage configurations independently.

Pricing and ROI: SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal involves higher setup costs, aiming for long-term ROI in large-scale operations. Apache Web Server has a lower initial cost, making it a cost-effective, scalable solution often seen as providing higher ROI due to adaptability for web-based needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Web Server vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Po...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 11.2%, up from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is 1.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Sakthivel Veeramuthu

Technology Lead at Infosys

Easy to optimize for high performance and handle heavy traffic

Most of the features I liked were related to the performance during peak hours. Because I needed to optimize the Apache web server to run it as a high performer during my customers' usage, then I needed to reduce my Apache web server resource usage for that. So that part of the thing is what I was more interested in doing. So, I mainly liked the performance and security.

Read full review

Anand_Kumar

Enterprise Architect at DXC Technology

The UI makes the setup easy to do from anywhere

Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time. Fixing this will help the customer and help to meet their expectations. SAP needs to come up with a standardized version of NetWeaver. The solution is good on the internal side, but not so much from the client perspective when they view it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Most of the features I liked were related to the performance during peak hours."

"It is scalable."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"The control panel is very easy to navigate. It's similar to most hosting platforms, so it's user-friendly. Once you get used to it, managing your hosting becomes easy, too."

"Apache Web Server can be used as a proxy server"

"It is more secure to use Apache and you will have fewer problems than other web services."

"The most significant advantage is the ability to swiftly enable HTTPS services when my DNS is configured correctly."

"It's very stable, and it hosts one of the biggest of many biggest web applications in the world."

More Apache Web Server pros

"Internal workflow approval around ESS and MSS leave days, capex approval as well as internal communication to the business have improved the way my organization functions."

"From the use of this solution, we have been able to establish better processes and have greater management of our company."

"They integrated it with the SAP router."

"Workflow functionality and internal portal capabilities are the most important features."

Cons

"The major issue occurs with ports. So, I would like to see easier port management."

"So far, for us, everything is okay."

"The GUI for the less experienced users needs some improvement. For some companies, it is hard to configure it if they have not had any experience."

"It would be great if technical support for Apache were available in Iran. It is a very important need."

"Adding a reverse proxy to Apache Web Server would be a significant improvement."

"By optimizing the infrastructure to allow the webserver to directly handle queries from memory—particularly by prioritizing the storage of queries in memory and processing them through the web server interface—I could potentially cut down the required instances from five hundred to two hundred."

"There isn't a dedicated customer support available"

"I want the user interface to be more user-friendly."

More Apache Web Server cons

"External portal functionality with suppliers and customers needs improvement."

"Due to our business, some setups were very complex."

"We encountered stability issues, especially on external functionality around its RFP capabilities."

"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly."

"Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time. Fixing this will help the customer and help to meet their expectations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The apache software is free, open-source."

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

"There is no licensing cost for the product."

"It is an open-source solution."

"The cost of this solution is high."

"SAP is not for every business. It depends on what is required. SAP is always going to be expensive."

"Because India is so competitive in the IT world, people will start to move away from SAP's pricing because they have a market monopoly. Soon, they will start losing the monopoly part to open source and other things. I don't think their monopoly will run for more than three to four years because people are getting away from these monopolies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Web Server?

The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?

Apache Web Server is a free product, with no associated setup costs or licensing fees.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

There is no need for substantial improvements as we have a dedicated team managing the server, ensuring everything runs smoothly.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IIS vs Apache Web Server

Compared 40% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Apache Web Server

Compared 30% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs Apache Web Server

Compared 9% of the time

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache Web Server Competitors

IBM DataPower Gateway vs SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal

Compared 36% of the time

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal

Compared 31% of the time

More SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server

July 2025

Download Apache Web Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

July 2025

Download SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal product report

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server

NetWeaver Enterprise Portal, SAP Portal

Overview

The Apache HTTP Server Project was founded in 1995 by a group of webmasters, known as The Apache Group, with the aim of developing robust, richly-featured, freely-available and commercial-standard Web (HTTP) server source code. The result was Apache Web Server or Apache HTTP Server, which is an open-source public-domain web server.

This collaborative project has been enhanced ever since with contributions from the core development team and other volunteers situated all over the globe. Also, hundreds of users of this open-source web server have contributed code, ideas, and documentation. The project falls under The Apache Software Foundation, which manages many open-source projects.

Apache

SAP Enterprise Portal allows to create attractive corporate portals that leverage the responsive SAP Fiori launchpad experience. The portal is the Web front-end component for SAP NetWeaver, the comprehensive integration and application platform that facilitates the alignment of people, information, and business processes across organizational and technical boundaries. It's ideal for organizations who require access to many applications and services across system landscapes, especially across JAVA and ABAP-based landscapes. The portal offers a single point of access to SAP and non-SAP information sources, enterprise applications, information repositories, databases and services, in and outside your organization. The portal can be accessed from desktops and from mobile devices, it can provide with the tools to manage and analyze its information resources, and to share and collaborate. With its role-based content, and personalization features, the portal enables users - from employees and customers to partners and suppliers - to focus exclusively on data relevant to daily decision-making processes. The technology and architecture of the portal ensures it is built for the enterprise, providing a secure and scalable environment.

SAP

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx

Alliander N.V.

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal

July 2025

Free Report: Apache Web Server vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Web Server vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Web Server vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.