We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs Oracle BI Applications comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. Oracle BI Applications and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is extremely scalable.""We are able to monitor all B2B messages, and we are able to see or track each message on it from an error perspective. That's a good side of it. It is working well, and we're able to do our current job."

More IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services Pros →

"It has a very robust dashboard and ad-hoc reporting.""Calculations are a little bit faster. It can do the on-the-run calculations much better than other reporting platforms. You don't need any other specific tool. You can use Microsoft Office to start doing things with these reports."

More Oracle BI Applications Pros →

Cons
"Onboarding on the solution is complex. It's hard to onboard partners and customer suppliers. It's one aspect that is not that straightforward.""It can be now classified as a legacy system because there are no more updates. From what I know, there will be no updates for the current version, which is an issue. Therefore, we are looking for a compatible new software that we can use. We're currently researching what is there in the market. We would consider something that would give us better speed on our current processor. There is also room for improvement in terms of its scalability and GUI. It is an old system, and its scalability can be improved. Its GUI can also be more appealing."

More IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services Cons →

"The initial setup was complex and it took a lot of time to set up the infrastructure.""It is very cumbersome and slow for making any changes. It doesn't have that many visuals to show different graphs and charts. It should have more visuals. It also doesn't support HTML5, which is useful for interactive sessions and reporting with dashboard etc. We are phasing it out because we need a newer platform that provides us more flexibility and more designs. Our use case is just to get the utility type of monthly reports, and we need visuals, customizations, columns, and certain sections on the report to show performance and other things. They are not updating their BI Publisher product, which was known as XML Publisher before Oracle bought it. It could be because they don't have that many clients using it. We are using it because we have this solution for years."

More Oracle BI Applications Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is expensive. It is more than 100K for support. You pay for support on top of the standard licensing, which is on a yearly basis."
  • More Oracle BI Applications Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    We are able to monitor all B2B messages, and we are able to see or track each message on it from an error perspective. That's a good side of it. It is working well, and we're able to do our current… more »
    Top Answer: 
    It can be now classified as a legacy system because there are no more updates. From what I know, there will be no updates for the current version, which is an issue. Therefore, we are looking for a… more »
    Top Answer: 
    We use it for B2B transactions with different partners that are going into our backend system.
    Top Answer: 
    It is expensive. It is more than 100K for support. You pay for support on top of the standard licensing, which is on a yearly basis.
    Top Answer: 
    Calculations are a little bit faster. It can do the on-the-run calculations much better than other reporting platforms. You don't need any other specific tool. You can use Microsoft Office to start… more »
    Top Answer: 
    It is expensive. It is more than 100K for support. You pay for support on top of the standard licensing, which is on a yearly basis.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,062
    Comparisons
    1,715
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    566
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    200
    Comparisons
    135
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    590
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services are designed to alleviate the burden on internal resources by providing secure connectivity and collaboration with your customers, suppliers, and business partners. The solution is built on the cloud-based B2B integration and visibility capabilities of IBM Sterling B2B Collaboration Network and provides comprehensive service offerings for partner onboarding, B2B process management, and trading partner support.

    • Facilitate growth by rapidly growing and adapting your B2B community without burdening internal resources and capital
    • Reduce B2B total cost of ownership by reducing the cost and increasing the reliability of B2B operations

    Accelerate B2B collaboration with global customers and suppliers by leveraging our B2B expertise.

    Oracle Business Intelligence (BI) Applications are complete, prebuilt BI solutions that deliver intuitive, role-based intelligence throughout an organization. These solutions enable organizations to gain more insight and greater value from a range of data sources, including Oracle Fusion Cloud and On-Premise Applications, E-Business Suite, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards, Siebel, and third party systems. Oracle BI Applications are built on the Oracle BI Foundation, a comprehensive and market leading BI platform. This enables organizations to realize the value of a packaged BI application, such as rapid deployment, lower TCO, and built-in best practices, all on one common BI Foundation. 

    Offer
    Learn more about IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services
    Learn more about Oracle BI Applications
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Cox Enterprises, Lochbridge
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Government7%
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. Oracle BI Applications and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services is ranked 5th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 2 reviews while Oracle BI Applications is ranked 8th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 2 reviews. IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services is rated 8.6, while Oracle BI Applications is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services writes "Flexible and scalable with great pricing options". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BI Applications writes "Fast calculations, stable, and good support, but needs more visuals, support for HTML5, and BI Publisher updates". IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services is most compared with SAP Process Orchestration, OpenText Trading Grid, Mule ESB, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and BizTalk Server, whereas Oracle BI Applications is most compared with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite. See our IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. Oracle BI Applications report.

    See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

    We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.