Oracle BI Applications vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

Oracle and Seeburger are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Oracle is ranked #18, while Seeburger is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0. Oracle holds a 1.0% mindshare in BBM, compared to Seeburger’s 10.5% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Seeburger users who would recommend it.

Oracle BI Applications

Read 6 Oracle BI Applications reviews

183 Views
57 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Read 39 SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite reviews

1,245 Views
628 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle BI Applications

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and Oracle BI Applications compete in integration solutions and business intelligence. SEEBURGER has the upper hand in integration flexibility, while Oracle leads in analytics capabilities.

Features: SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite offers robust integration adaptability, supporting diverse protocols and data formats, which boosts flexibility in different business settings. The platform independence and powerful mapping designer enhance its configurability. Oracle BI Applications provide strong pre-built business intelligence solutions, intuitive data analysis tools, and comprehensive reporting capabilities, with dynamic dashboards and ad-hoc reporting features.

Room for Improvement: SEEBURGER could enhance its user interface for simpler navigation and expand on pre-built data transformations to reduce setup time. Integrating a more comprehensive monitoring system could improve service reliability. Oracle BI Applications might refine its initial setup complexity to streamline deployment. Enhancing real-time analytics performance and offering more flexible data export options could boost usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SEEBURGER provides a flexible deployment model with options for on-premises and cloud solutions, paired with responsive customer support known for effectiveness. Oracle BI Applications require a more extensive setup process, yet they offer a range of deployment models. Oracle's customer service encompasses comprehensive resources, although it can be less responsive compared to SEEBURGER's immediate support approach.

Pricing and ROI: SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite involves a lower initial cost, ensuring quicker ROI through efficient integration processes. Oracle BI Applications have a higher setup cost due to their advanced features, yet are considered a worthwhile investment for organizations keen on deep analytical insights. This pricing variance indicates a balance between cost and feature sets for different business demands.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle BI Applications vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BI Applications vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle BI Applications

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

18th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (13th), API Management (22nd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of Oracle BI Applications is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is 10.5%, up from 8.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Rehman Mohar

Senior Manager, Software Engineering Client Reporting at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Fast calculations, stable, and good support, but needs more visuals, support for HTML5, and BI Publisher updates

It is very cumbersome and slow for making any changes. It doesn't have that many visuals to show different graphs and charts. It should have more visuals. It also doesn't support HTML5, which is useful for interactive sessions and reporting with dashboard etc. We are phasing it out because we need a newer platform that provides us more flexibility and more designs. Our use case is just to get the utility type of monthly reports, and we need visuals, customizations, columns, and certain sections on the report to show performance and other things. They are not updating their BI Publisher product, which was known as XML Publisher before Oracle bought it. It could be because they don't have that many clients using it. We are using it because we have this solution for years.

Read full review

VARUNKUMAR

Mgr Value Chain Integration/EDI at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

Great end-to-end integration, data mapping, and communication protocols

At this moment, everything is working fine. When we are talking to them, when we are trying to bring all this mapping in-house, right now, SEEBURGER is doing everything for us. However, when we are thinking of going onto the cloud, so they are not using any of AWS or Azure which are more stable. They have their own private cloud. That's the reason we did not go ahead with managing everything by ourselves or moving into the cloud. They said that they're going to be doing it within the next two years, having access to Azure and AWS. That would be something we would like to see.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a very robust dashboard and ad-hoc reporting."

"It's web-based so that I can have multiple users accessing the same data. It provides ease of use and its formatting means we can use the data, export it to Excel, and we manipulate the data afterward if we need to."

"The most valuable features are the reporting and the graphics."

"Calculations are a little bit faster. It can do the on-the-run calculations much better than other reporting platforms. You don't need any other specific tool. You can use Microsoft Office to start doing things with these reports."

"Mapping Designer provides excellent flexibility."

"Among the most valuable features are the EDI translator and a lot of the components which enable creating compliance sets. Having something standard out-of-the-box and being able to use that has been a huge benefit for us."

"SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a highly stable solution that offers rich features for our B2B integration."

"SEEBURGER BIS can reconcile documentation, like our accounts payable and statements within the system. If you are manually doing it, then it is really time consuming with a lot of errors. Whereas, SEEBURGER BIS allows for a lot of basic level programming within the documentation, filtering, and sorting out VLOOKUP. It lets us get two database tables from two different systems, then merge them based on the logic that we provide. So, it is a very helpful product."

"Among the most important [features] are the BIC 6 Converter and the communication protocols, which have the newer security features for certificates and encryption."

"SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) has been good at communicating between two applications, changing formats and using the required protocols... We can have one site communicating in an old FTP or SFTP style, or via file transfer. And with other applications, we could have API or a web service call or some other protocol used to send information."

"It has a lot of basic EDI already established for all the main users. Also, it lets me share setups that I had already set up for my first plant. I was able to use them for my second one which was very helpful. I didn't have to start from scratch for my second facility."

"Having the SEEBURGER consulting team perform the installation alleviates a lot of headaches and ensures a stable system."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pros

Cons

"The initial setup was complex and it took a lot of time to set up the infrastructure."

"It is very cumbersome and slow for making any changes. It doesn't have that many visuals to show different graphs and charts. It should have more visuals. It also doesn't support HTML5, which is useful for interactive sessions and reporting with dashboard etc. We are phasing it out because we need a newer platform that provides us more flexibility and more designs. Our use case is just to get the utility type of monthly reports, and we need visuals, customizations, columns, and certain sections on the report to show performance and other things. They are not updating their BI Publisher product, which was known as XML Publisher before Oracle bought it. It could be because they don't have that many clients using it. We are using it because we have this solution for years."

"The initial setup was difficult because not all the information was included in the implementation model."

"The integration is not so excellent. While I'm not saying there is a problem, there is no pattern. When we start a new project, we have to work with new people and processes every time. The technical side of their system is very good, but their change process is not repeatable. It needs to be rebuilt each time."

"In some of the other tools out there in the market, you can create one service and use that service without creating a copy. That kind of capability currently doesn't exist in this solution."

"When we got SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS), it was clear that it was going to take more of a technical person. It does take a technically-rooted individual to operate it. It's not something for your everyday guy to do. For what it's doing for us, a dedicated resource is required."

"All the topics we've identified have been placed on the SEEBURGER roadmap already... Among the things we have requested are improvements in the user interface and improvements that would be implemented by completely new modules or improvements in their Cloud Services."

"A true debugger that allows you to step through the process would be a good improvement. Right now, we are limited to reading the log file generated by the test screen in Mapping Designer."

"Some of the functionality for retriggering documents, where you have to step through a termination process and then retrigger it, versus just being able to restart or retrigger more easily, is a bit challenging, depending on the scenario."

"SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite does not have an end user or subscriber console which can show the traffic status."

"Difficult in handling large amounts of data, like when the file has more than 100MB in size."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As with any case study that we’ve ever done, it’s not so much a problem with the application or security or anything of that nature. It’s basically the cost infrastructure. Compared to other solutions, it’s one of the more costly solutions out there. It’s the biggest concern nowadays that upper management has."

"It is expensive. It is more than 100K for support. You pay for support on top of the standard licensing, which is on a yearly basis."

"The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if you're not utilizing all of that then they should consider a lower tier. That way, they could attract more business."

"Pricing, compared to the tool that we had earlier, is cheaper."

"I had a problem at one time with their invoicing. I told them, then we worked on the process and improved it. They installed the connection between SAP and SEEBURGER BIS in Europe first. This was awhile ago. When I came along, I became involved in the project and started working with them. Every time that I made a request, the work was done well, but I was not receiving my invoices. I knew I had to pay for the work and was trying to find someone to send me the invoices or a report of what was being done. From that end, it was really not working. After a few years, I was complaining and not happy. At the end of the year, they would come with a long list of invoices to pay, which was really bad. So, I asked for a change. We worked on the process, and since five years ago, I have worked with SEEBURGER based in North America. Now, when I have a question, I know who to contact. They send me a report with invoices every month. They really reacted to my concern, and we improved the process. Since then, I have had no problem."

"I did a review of other options out there, as we moved into the future and our SAP implementation, that this would be the right solution. It was very comparable to other manage services out there. Thus, there wasn't any clear-cut reason to go in another direction."

"We have additional ad hoc development costs, but those vary depending on if we're bringing on another third-party into our systems via the EDI integration. So, that's highly variable."

"The pricing and licensing is very competitive."

"We pay per message we use. We spend about £19,000 a year with them."

"I have had exposure to other big vendors over the years and would have to say the pricing is pretty typical. They all fall into a common pricing range, at least the bigger vendors: Axway, IBM Sterling, Globalscape, and SEEBURGER. They all fall into that mid-tier pricing. So, SEEBURGER is commensurate with other large integration vendors operating in this space. Maybe it is lower than some of the really high-end ones. You can get some of these high-end transactional messaging integration systems, like TIBCO, that tend to be kind of on a higher echelon of pricing. I would say SEEBURGER is more mid-level."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a highly stable solution that offers rich features for our B2B integration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding areas of improvement for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, the cloud functionality needs enhancement. The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new tran...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs Oracle BI Applications

Compared 100% of the time

More Oracle BI Applications Competitors

SAP Cloud Platform vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 10% of the time

webMethods.io vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 9% of the time

Mule ESB vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BI Applications

May 2025

Download Oracle BI Applications product report

Buyer's Guide

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

May 2025

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report

Download SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

SEEBURGER BIS

Overview

Oracle Business Intelligence (BI) Applications are complete, prebuilt BI solutions that deliver intuitive, role-based intelligence throughout an organization. These solutions enable organizations to gain more insight and greater value from a range of data sources, including Oracle Fusion Cloud and On-Premise Applications, E-Business Suite, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards, Siebel, and third party systems. Oracle BI Applications are built on the Oracle BI Foundation, a comprehensive and market leading BI platform. This enables organizations to realize the value of a packaged BI application, such as rapid deployment, lower TCO, and built-in best practices, all on one common BI Foundation.

Oracle

With SEEBURGER’s experienced team behind you, and SEEBURGER BIS as the foundation of your hybrid integration strategy, you’re prepared for whatever comes your way – even as your business gains complexity and integration requirements increase.

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a unified, agile, secure and scalable platform that solves integration challenges across your business and ecosystem, so that you can make valuable connections between clouds, applications and people.

Our platform provides integration across all scenarios, including B2B/EDI, MFT, API and ERP on-premises, in the cloud and hybrid, in addition to expert support that is unmatched in the industry for your simplest to your most complex integrations.

Your APIs are likely multiplying quickly, and if you’re looking for a solution to manage, secure and scale them properly, you get all of the benefits and less of the hassle with our API Management toolkit.

Bring us your toughest B2B/EDI challenges. We help with difficult onboarding and partner connections, and will save you time and effort to complete complex projects. We make B2B easy with pre-packaged, re-usable content and automation capability, so your team can make the connection, and move on to the next mission.

Simplify your workload with our iPaaS solution. SEEBURGER iPaaS enables your team to save man-hours connecting data, applications and systems, by letting us handle all the time-consuming platform operations. We cover maintenance, updates, security, scalability and more.

Did you know that without managed file transfer (MFT), your company is at greater risk for a data breach? It’s as simple, and as dangerous, as that. The security and control you get with our centralized, easy-to-use solution ensures less risk for the company, and more sleep at night for you.

Our customers say it best! Check out our reviews you’ll see that SEEBURGER’s rock-solid, built-from-the-ground-up platform, is combined with an expert team, and stellar service. We power your connections, future-proof your vision and give you a competitive edge.

Seeburger

Sample Customers

Cox Enterprises, Lochbridge

Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BI Applications vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

June 2025

Free Report: Oracle BI Applications vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle BI Applications vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle BI Applications vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.