We performed a comparison between IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Tricentis RPA [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)."The solution is scalability."
"If you have a business process, and once you have automated that process, you have a readily available workflow in place."
"The good stuff about IBM is the fact that it's very easy to use, there are very nice and smart AI tools within the licensing that you don't have to pay any access. Moreover, it's more precise and more secure."
"I think simplicity is key. One of the things that we've noticed is how our developers have been able to quickly adopt the platform; but not only the developers or the techy people, also the business."
"I like the integration with Watson and the possibility to have an intelligent reading of all the customers' documents."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"IBM RPA helped us resolve a lot of difficult cases we could not resolve using other solutions."
"The solution’s performance is good."
"I like that it's user-friendly and easy for beginners to understand. It's not complex."
"One of the things I would definitely like to see is more of the machine-learning and cognitive capabilities. For example, now that we're starting to automate more and more tasks, there are some things that still require us to go back and modify the robots when we need to. But if we had more of the machine-learning integrated into it, I believe it would be easier to maintain, so that we wouldn't have to go back and adjust every time."
"The time it takes for approvals, and risk analysis could be faster."
"The product's document readers must be improved to capture the data well."
"Extensibility is the key, especially in terms of the Recorders feature that we have. That should be browser independent. Enhance it because some people have Chrome, some have Internet Explorer, etc. Also, integration with PDFs: Not just the ability to read information from PDFs but the ability to write information from PDFs, make it secure, sign it, etc. Finally, if they can allow a token exchange inside the tool itself, that would help."
"We can use its inbuilt activities, and it's a complete package, but just like ElectroNeek, a limitation is that we have to depend on its inbuilt activities. We can't include our own activities or we can't introduce other activities."
"The users should be allowed to create folders in Control Center."
"We're based in Thailand, but the documentation is not in Thai, which makes it difficult for us. If they could translate all of their documentation into our language, we'd be very grateful."
"Needs better integration with artificial intelligence or with machine-learning."
"The setup is complicated, it should be simplified."
More IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is ranked 8th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 23 reviews while Tricentis RPA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is rated 8.2, while Tricentis RPA [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) writes "User-friendly interface and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis RPA [EOL] writes "Is user-friendly and easy for beginners to understand". IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism and IPsoft 1RPA, whereas Tricentis RPA [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
