We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Functional Tester and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."
"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."
"What I like most about Visual Studio Test Professional is the way people publish templates and publish integration."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."
"The product must provide more automation."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"The data flow can be improved."
"The product must provide more integration."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
"The interface should be made attractive."
"It would be great to support other languages and applications, and that is one of the things we can improve."
"The vendor must release a lightweight version of the solution."
More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 21st in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 7.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, Katalon Studio, HCL OneTest, Tricentis Tosca and Worksoft Certify, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
