IBM DevOps Test UI vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
22nd
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
10th
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tricentis Tosca
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
1st
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
100
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM DevOps Test UI is 0.4%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 20.0%, up from 15.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
Unique Categories:
Regression Testing Tools
0.4%
Mobile App Testing Tools
35.0%
 

Featured Reviews

HZ
Aug 15, 2022
Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support
The solution is used for test automation, and test data creation The solution has provided more accurate results with database verification. Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time. The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework.…
KC
Apr 13, 2023
Is easy to set up, reduces release cycle timing, and is stable and scalable
We utilize Tricentis Tosca to reduce our release cycle timing for our SAP releases. We have at least one release every quarter. We also use it for automation We have to automate thousands of test cases and complete end-to-end SAP on business processes. To manually execute these tasks, it would…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."
"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"Tricentis Tosca can be easily integrated with SAP infrastructure."
"We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis."
"We like the fact that it works across mobile, desktop, web, and APIs. Due to this, the solution has a broad range of applications."
"The solution has plenty of features compared to other solutions."
"It's integrated with different technologies, desktop applications, package solutions like SAP, and mobile applications."
"The low code is the best feature."
"We have to automate thousands of test cases and complete end-to-end SAP on business processes. To manually execute these tasks, it would take us at least two months. By automating these tasks using Tosca, now it takes five to 10 days maximum. Tricentis Tosca is a codeless or scriptless automation tool."
"It's a simple tool, particularly in terms of system testing. You can also convert and automate using Tricentis Tosca with ease."
 

Cons

"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"The solution is expensive compared to other tools in the market."
"The integration with mobile testing could be useful."
"Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability."
"Might have a learning curve, as it does not follow the traditional Record-Play functionality, but tests have to be built from requirements or Agile story cards."
"The reporting function was lacking in usability and detail."
"Running the regression – if multiple lists are executed at once or if a list contains 200+ tests, it’s a pain to stop the execution."
"I would like to see better integration with other testing tools."
"ScratchBook execution needs to be improved as Tosca crashes multiple times."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."
"I give the cost of Tricentis Tosca a six out of seven."
"If you are purchasing less than five licenses, then the pricing is high. On a scale from one to ten, with one being low and ten being high pricing, I would rate this solution at eight."
"Pricing could be better."
"I rate the price of Tricentis Tosca a two out of five."
"The pricing is high, but altogether it offers you the ability to automate all sorts of applications: desktop, web, mobile, etc."
"The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. However, it used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive."
"They are probably more expensive than other comparable tools, but you also get the full suite of testing tools."
"Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Insurance Company
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Rational Functional Tester?
Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time.
What needs improvement with IBM Rational Functional Tester?
The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to...
What is your primary use case for IBM Rational Functional Tester?
The solution is used for test automation, and test data creation.
How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?
For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.
 

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Edumate
HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.