Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM BPM vs WebLogic Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Businesses using IBM BPM reported improved efficiency, automation, and cost savings despite high costs and moderate ROI.
Sentiment score
8.1
Users achieve ROI with WebLogic Suite by optimizing capacity, needing minimal administration, and benefiting from Oracle integration.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
IBM BPM customer service is generally positive, with effective support, though response delays and communication issues are noted.
Sentiment score
6.1
WebLogic Suite support receives mixed reviews due to high costs, complex navigation, and variable quality across regions and installations.
The customer service is outstanding.
We had a contract that provided on-site support, which was very satisfactory.
Technical support from Oracle is rated around eight due to resource constraints in Pakistan.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
IBM BPM offers impressive scalability, efficiently managing high user volumes with varied experiences and requiring occasional careful tuning.
Sentiment score
8.2
WebLogic Suite offers scalability and reliability, efficiently handling large user loads and transactions, especially with optimized server integrations.
The solution has scalability issues; on a scale, I would rate it at eight out of ten.
I found IBM BPM to be scalable to a certain level but it struggled with large volumes of concurrent transactions.
Oracle suggested moving to cluster infrastructure to enhance scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
IBM BPM stability varies; recent versions improve reliability, but issues remain with infrastructure, configuration, and developer expertise.
Sentiment score
7.6
WebLogic Suite is stable and robust, handling diverse environments well with minor issues often related to applications, not itself.
The stability of WebLogic Suite depends largely on application behavior and the required real-time availability.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM BPM needs improved customization, integration, and user-friendliness, addressing complexity and high cost with enhanced API and AI features.
WebLogic Suite needs improved usability, scalability, performance, support, and streamlined processes for better cloud, documentation, and administration.
IBM BPM also lacks smaller solutions, so I must purchase multiple solutions to start with workflows and applications.
Oracle has suggested migrating to a cluster infrastructure with one WebLogic server and multiple managed servers.
One area for improvement in WebLogic Suite is the installation time.
 

Setup Cost

IBM BPM's high costs suit large enterprises, while flexible Cloud Pak and tiered licensing offer varied pricing options.
WebLogic Suite is expensive and complex, ideal for financially strong companies, with flexible cloud pricing options for growth.
SAP is more expensive, but IBM BPM is very expensive.
WebLogic Suite is high-priced, akin to a Lamborghini.
 

Valuable Features

IBM BPM offers integration, scalability, and low-code development with strong UI, enhancing efficiency and reducing complexities.
WebLogic Suite excels in scalability, integration, and management, offering robust hosting for enterprise-grade applications with a user-friendly interface.
The integration capabilities of IBM BPM are excellent.
I have seen benefits from the middleware capability of WebLogic Suite for creating cohesive IT ecosystems, and it's stable.
One of the most valuable features of WebLogic Suite is its integration with JMS services and queue services.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM BPM
Ranking in Application Infrastructure
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
111
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (7th), Process Automation (5th)
WebLogic Suite
Ranking in Application Infrastructure
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of IBM BPM is 3.4%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WebLogic Suite is 3.7%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Infrastructure
 

Featured Reviews

Prince Mathew - PeerSpot reviewer
More customizable than IBM FileNet and useful for automation
One suggestion for IBM BPM is to provide better integration between their products, such as DataCap, which we use for scanning. Although the new CP4BA offers offline capabilities, not everyone is on CP4BA, so enhanced integration for those on older versions would be beneficial. Another major suggestion is to offer a migration path when a product reaches its end of life. For example, there was no migration path when we moved, so we had to redo everything we had developed over ten years completely.
Mari Pandian - PeerSpot reviewer
Coding flexibility with good integration but users need coding knowledge
We are an Oracle partner and work with many Oracle applications for integration purposes. WebLogic is used for integrating various Oracle applications and third-party services WebLogic allows us to do the coding as per the customer's requirements. It helps us meet their needs by integrating their…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
30%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better, IBM BPM or IBM Business Automation Workflow?
We researched both IBM solutions and in the end, we chose Business Automation Workflow. IBM BPM has a good user interface and the BPM coach is a helpful tool. The API is very useful in providing en...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM BPM?
Once it is installed, maintaining it is not a big issue.
What do you like most about WebLogic Suite?
The solution is useful for centralizing data.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WebLogic Suite?
WebLogic Suite is high-priced, akin to a Lamborghini. Its affordability suits enterprise-level organizations with digital footprints requiring robust financial resources.
What needs improvement with WebLogic Suite?
Currently, we have a one-to-one mapping with web servers and WebLogic servers. To scale up and meet future needs, we are considering cluster implementation. Oracle has suggested migrating to a clus...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

WebSphere Lombardi Edition, IBM Business Process Manager, IBM WebSphere Process Server
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Barclays, EmeriCon, Banca Popolare di Milano, CST Consulting, KeyBank, KPMG, Prolifics, Sandhata Technologies Ltd., State of Alaska, Humana S.A., Saperion, esciris, Banco Espirito Santo
State Revenue Office Victoria, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Reliance Commercial Finance, Center for Railway Information Systems, Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, MCB Bank, Pacfico Seguros Generales
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM BPM vs. WebLogic Suite and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.