We performed a comparison between IBM App Connect and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has different type of interfaces that can integrate with companies."
"It has an efficient design flow."
"It's stable to use, connect with the cloud, and to deploy."
"The most valuable feature is the security."
"The solution is fast and supports Open UI 3.0 certification."
"The most valuable feature is the user-friendliness of the application."
"App Connect's best feature is that it can be deployed in a container."
"Very scalable, flexible, and user-friendly."
"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."
"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."
"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."
"The customer service executives are very responsive."
"The learning curve for this solution is very good."
"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."
"The solution's customer service is good."
"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."
"The addition of string functionality would be a benefit, particularly in the ESQL space that IBM already uses internally."
"The interface could be better."
"IBM needs to enhance and have a stronger offering for the event streaming part because this is the future needed for the containerization and the new integration requirement."
"When we do a version upgrade of the system, the platform is kind of complicated."
"In the next release, I would like to get some quality connectors."
"Plugins for the repositories are difficult to find."
"They reply in one or two hours at most, but they could be better."
"The installation of containers could be simplified, as it currently requires a senior-level installer."
"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."
"You cannot include the validation of XPath."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."
"They should introduce better pricing for small companies."
"The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components."
"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."
"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."
IBM App Connect is ranked 11th in Cloud Data Integration with 20 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 19th in Data Integration with 18 reviews. IBM App Connect is rated 8.2, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM App Connect writes "Very flexible and user-friendly; embeds with other technologies; no dependency on queue manager". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". IBM App Connect is most compared with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration, Mule Anypoint Platform, webMethods Integration Server, IBM InfoSphere DataStage and BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and Mule ESB. See our IBM App Connect vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
