Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hunters vs i-SIEM [EOL] comparison

Hunters and Cybereason are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Additionally, 100% of Hunters users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cybereason users who would recommend it.
Hunters
Read 1 Hunters review
  • 1,293 Views
  • 892 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
i-SIEM [EOL]
Read 1 i-SIEM [EOL] review
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

    i-SIEM [EOL] and Hunters are products in the cybersecurity domain. Hunters appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, which may justify a higher investment.

    Features: i-SIEM [EOL] is recognized for its adaptability, robust analytics, and compatibility across various IT environments. Hunters provides innovative threat detection, AI-driven analytics, and a strong focus on automation and integration for managing complex threats.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: i-SIEM [EOL] offers flexible deployment models and accessible customer support, accommodating multiple infrastructures. Hunters ensures streamlined cloud-based deployment, optimizing efficiency, though it may have a longer learning curve.

    Pricing and ROI: i-SIEM [EOL] offers cost-effective setups with satisfactory ROI for budget-conscious organizations. Hunters presents a higher initial cost but achieves significant ROI through long-term operational savings and effective threat mitigation.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: February 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    February 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Hunters
    Average Rating
    8.0
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.0
    Number of Reviews
    1
    Ranking in other categories
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (35th), SOC as a Service (5th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (31st)
    i-SIEM [EOL]
    Average Rating
    9.0
    Number of Reviews
    1
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    VikramSingh8 - PeerSpot reviewer
    VikramSingh8
    Security Delivery Manager at Accenture
    Advanced detectors streamline threat monitoring with many use cases
    Hunter support is functional yet not exceptional. Their support engineers could be more advanced and faster in providing solutions. Their turnaround time could improve to match other tools. When feedback is provided, they consider it and indicate if it is in the development stage. They commit to fixing bugs and developing the module or feature, however, take quite a lot of time. I would rate their customer support as needing improvement. Another area needing improvement is integration capabilities, as they are not yet fully compatible. Users still have to rely on third-party software or integration tools. Furthermore, they should incorporate more GenAI capabilities, a current buzzword, and enable predictive use cases. Their tools should be capable of reading the environment, making adaptations, and automatically tweaking settings as per client or environmental needs, similar to capabilities provided by other SIEM tools.
    Read full review
    Dannie Combs - PeerSpot reviewer
    Dannie Combs
    Senior Vice President and Chief Information Security Officer at Donnelley Financial Solutions
    The alert fatigue and false positive rates have just plummeted, which is really exciting.
    empow has a few areas of improvement as with any other technology, such as continuing to drive innovation in the dashboard. While we've been extremely impressed with the dashboard's ease of use, flexibility, ability to drill down deeply, and focus very intently on an area of interest, there will always be opportunities to be more innovative and open it up to a wider audience than just the operations group, for example. With reporting, there is always a desire to have custom reporting for every client of empow. Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "Other SIEM tools base their license cost on the volume of data processed, often charging by how much TB or GB data is processed. Hunter, however, charges based on the number of data sources and the number of data entities integrated, which saves money."
    "Hunter proactively provides a set of five to six hundred use cases, categorized based on cloud use cases, endpoint use cases, parameter use cases, and malicious use cases."
    "As a result of the automation, we are able to manage SIEM with a small security team. I'm in a unique position where we have been growing the security organization quite rapidly over the last three and a half years. But, as a direct result of the empow transition and legacy collection of tools towards the empow platform, we've been able to keep that head count flat. We've been able to redirect a lot of the security team's time away from the wash, rinse, repeat activities of responding to alarms where we have a high degree of confidence that they will be false positives, adjusting the rules accordingly. This can be a bit frustrating for the analyst when they have to spend hours a day dealing with these types of probable false positives. So, it has helped not only us keep our headcount flat relative to the resources necessary to provide the assurances that our executives expect of us for monitoring, but allows our analyst team to spend the majority of their time doing what they love. They are spending their time meaningfully with a higher degree of confidence and enjoying getting into the incident response type activity."
     

    Cons

    "Hunter support is functional yet not exceptional. Their support engineers could be more advanced and faster in providing solutions."
    "Hunter support is functional yet not exceptional."
    "Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    Information not available
    "I don't have to put up with any longer with these hypercomplex licensing agreements. Every time I want to add some additional reporting as a compliance centric or regulatory specific, e.g., GDPR, PCI, or Sarbanes-Oxley, many providers would have an additional license for this, which felt a bit ridiculous to me. With the simplified licensing architecture, there were no hidden "gotchas" down the road with empow. Something I have experienced with other providers that I've worked with in the past."
    "With a higher degree of fidelity in the alarms, we were able to avoid adding additional resources to our teams. We take into account the cost of security resources in the market and the significantly higher fidelity from the alarms that are being generated. This drove down our costs with our MSSP. It drove down my cost for human capital internally. It drove down our need to have multiple resources supporting the underlying infrastructure and health and maintenance of empow as a platform from several resources down to one. Therefore, human capital costs were significantly reduced. Our operating expenses were significantly reduced. Our capital costs were significantly reduced while tripling our capacity and our run rate reduced. It was almost a "too good to be true" situation. Fortunately, for us, it worked out very nicely."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Computer Software Company
    10%
    Manufacturing Company
    8%
    Financial Services Firm
    8%
    Leisure / Travel Company
    7%
    Performing Arts
    11%
    Comms Service Provider
    7%
    Financial Services Firm
    7%
    Manufacturing Company
    7%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    No data available
    No data available
     

    Questions from the Community

    What needs improvement with Hunters?
    Hunter support is functional yet not exceptional. Their support engineers could be more advanced and faster in providing solutions. Their turnaround time could improve to match other tools. When fe...
    See all answers
    What is your primary use case for Hunters?
    Hunter is a very new SIEM in the market. It is definitely a broad market for us as they are trying to establish a new place against competitors like Splunk and QRadar. This makes it challenging to ...
    See all answers
    What advice do you have for others considering Hunters?
    Their knowledge base is good. When starting with Hunter, ensure you have one or two sessions to understand navigation, features, and modules, along with obtaining proper documentation. This will he...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Huntress Managed SIEM vs Hunters Logo
    Huntress Managed SIEM vs Hunters
    Compared 19% of the time
    Anomali vs Hunters Logo
    Anomali vs Hunters
    Compared 12% of the time
    Panther vs Hunters Logo
    Panther vs Hunters
    Compared 9% of the time
    Anvilogic vs Hunters Logo
    Anvilogic vs Hunters
    Compared 9% of the time
    Cynet vs Hunters Logo
    Cynet vs Hunters
    Compared 8% of the time
    More Hunters Competitors
    DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 23% of the time
    Netsurion vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    Netsurion vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 19% of the time
    Splunk Enterprise Security vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    Splunk Enterprise Security vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 16% of the time
    Trellix ESM vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    Trellix ESM vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 15% of the time
    Logpoint vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    Logpoint vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 14% of the time
    More i-SIEM [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    February 2026
    Hunters reportDownload Hunters product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    February 2026
    i-SIEM [EOL] reportDownload i-SIEM [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    Hunters.AI
    No data available
     

    Interactive Demo

    Hunters
    Demo not available
    Cybereason
     

    Overview

    Hunters Security Operations Platform is a Human-Driven, AI-Powered SIEM alternative that revolutionize the way SOCs operate. Hunters automates the entire TDIR process, replacing repetitive human work with machine-powered detection, enrichment, correlation, prioritization and investigation, freeing analysts to proactively protect their organizations. Hunters utilizes an open security data lake architecture, ensuring complete and cost effective coverage of the entire security stack.

    Hunters

    i-SIEM [EOL] is an innovative security information and event management platform designed to enhance threat detection and response capabilities in IT environments.

    i-SIEM [EOL] offers a comprehensive approach to managing and analyzing security alerts, ensuring that businesses can effectively mitigate risks. With advanced threat intelligence and robust analytics, it helps organizations streamline their security operations and improve incident response times, providing each organization the information required to make informed security decisions.

    What are the most important features of i-SIEM [EOL]?
    • Real-time Monitoring: Continuously tracks network activity to detect potential threats.
    • Advanced Threat Detection: Utilizes AI to identify sophisticated attacks.
    • Customizable Dashboards: Allows users to tailor their view and focus on relevant data.
    • Automated Incident Response: Streamlines the response process by automating certain actions.
    • Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing business needs.
    What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?
    • Improved Security Posture: Enhanced monitoring capabilities reduce risk exposure.
    • Operational Efficiency: Automation cuts down manual efforts and saves time.
    • Increased Visibility: Comprehensive insights into activity improve decision-making.
    • Cost Management: Helps allocate resources more effectively, potentially reducing costs.

    i-SIEM [EOL] is particularly beneficial in industries such as finance and healthcare where data security is paramount. Its ability to integrate with existing infrastructure allows seamless adoption, offering enhanced security without disrupting operations. Industries handling sensitive information value its advanced capabilities to safeguard data integrity.

    Cybereason
     

    Sample Customers

    We're happy to support organizations like Booking.com, ChargePoint, Yext, Red Ventures and Cimpress who leverage Hunters SOC Platform to transform their security teams' operations.
    University of Oklahoma, Donnelley
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    February 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, IBM and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: February 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.