Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Splunk Enterprise Security vs i-SIEM [EOL] comparison

Cybereason and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Additionally, 100% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
i-SIEM [EOL]
Read 1 i-SIEM [EOL] review
    100% willing to recommend
    Splunk Enterprise Security
    Read 369 Splunk Enterprise Security reviews
    • 23,960 Views
    • 12,459 Comparison Views
    93% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

    Splunk Enterprise Security and i-SIEM EOL are competing in the security information and event management category. i-SIEM EOL may have an advantage due to its superior features, making it appealing for some users.

    Features: Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive analytics, real-time threat hunting capabilities, and robust data integration. i-SIEM EOL provides ease of customization, advanced machine learning models for threat detection, and flexibility in adapting to various security environments. Key differences include Splunk's focus on analytics integration versus i-SIEM's customizable solutions.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Enterprise Security has a well-documented deployment process and strong customer support for seamless installation. i-SIEM EOL features a streamlined deployment process with dedicated support for custom configurations. While Splunk offers comprehensive guidance, i-SIEM's strength is in personalized service.

    Pricing and ROI: Splunk Enterprise Security can involve higher initial setup costs, offering substantial ROI through scalable solutions. i-SIEM EOL presents a cost-effective entry with significant ROI due to flexible deployment options and adaptive capabilities. This demonstrates Splunk's upfront investment in contrast to i-SIEM's budget-friendly approach with strong long-term benefits.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: September 2025).
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    September 2025
    Download the complete report
    Helped 869,883 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    i-SIEM [EOL]
    Average Rating
    9.0
    Number of Reviews
    1
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
    Splunk Enterprise Security
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.3
    Number of Reviews
    369
    Ranking in other categories
    Log Management (2nd), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (1st), IT Operations Analytics (1st)
     

    Featured Reviews

    Dannie Combs - PeerSpot reviewer
    The alert fatigue and false positive rates have just plummeted, which is really exciting.
    empow has a few areas of improvement as with any other technology, such as continuing to drive innovation in the dashboard. While we've been extremely impressed with the dashboard's ease of use, flexibility, ability to drill down deeply, and focus very intently on an area of interest, there will always be opportunities to be more innovative and open it up to a wider audience than just the operations group, for example. With reporting, there is always a desire to have custom reporting for every client of empow. Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus.
    Read full review
    Kyle Vernham - PeerSpot reviewer
    Built-in searches and unified data access streamline alert investigation and boosts analyst efficiency
    The two features I appreciate the most in Splunk Enterprise Security are the built-in searches, which have been very easy for us to get started with right out of the box, and the fact that it accesses all of our other systems. You can access it as a pane of glass rather than having to search individually. We also have the option to compare our analysts from our service to service. Splunk Enterprise Security helps our SOC team prioritize and investigate high-fidelity alerts more effectively by providing a more in-depth look and the ability to access a lot more of our data. Instead of jumping from several segmented systems, it allows us to have everything brought together in one place. For example, you have to move from our purview to our build system and to Splunk Enterprise Security, and it enables us to streamline that process. The built-in features of Splunk Enterprise Security, which we recently procured, have given us a good starting point and demonstrated the value of the product, providing an easy way to sell it to our company. The ease of getting everything into our purview helps us, and it serves as a good start for the investigation part in one location rather than what we usually have, which is jumping from system to system to system. Splunk Enterprise Security plays a role in our company's strategy to combat insider threats and advanced persistent threats by currently being in its technical test phase. We are still rolling it out, and it should help us find any insider threats based on information that our policy states should not be present in our system. Splunk Enterprise Security's risk-based alerting (RBA) has impacted our alert volume and analyst productivity because we've got many different systems feeding into it. However, it has helped to make it easier for our analysts to go through a set of events rather than 100 alerts. RBA allows us to streamline the process and customize it for our analysts. When it comes to leveraging Splunk Enterprise Security's dashboards and visualizations to communicate security posture to executives, it's pretty straightforward for any type of information. The visualization is easy to understand, but I haven't had any direct conversations with our executives.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "As a result of the automation, we are able to manage SIEM with a small security team. I'm in a unique position where we have been growing the security organization quite rapidly over the last three and a half years. But, as a direct result of the empow transition and legacy collection of tools towards the empow platform, we've been able to keep that head count flat. We've been able to redirect a lot of the security team's time away from the wash, rinse, repeat activities of responding to alarms where we have a high degree of confidence that they will be false positives, adjusting the rules accordingly. This can be a bit frustrating for the analyst when they have to spend hours a day dealing with these types of probable false positives. So, it has helped not only us keep our headcount flat relative to the resources necessary to provide the assurances that our executives expect of us for monitoring, but allows our analyst team to spend the majority of their time doing what they love. They are spending their time meaningfully with a higher degree of confidence and enjoying getting into the incident response type activity."
    "Splunk Enterprise Security is able to process a huge amount of data without any issues."
    "It's better than IBM, in my opinion, because it's an independent entity."
    "Splunk gives my clients the ability to bring multiple, disparate types of data together, then correlate and report on them."
    "The most valuable features are how stable and easy to use Splunk is."
    "This solution helps us increase our productivity."
    "The indexing and data collection are valuable."
    "My security ops team takes around 30 minutes to one hour to remediate security incidents with Splunk Enterprise Security compared to a previous solution."
    "It provides a risk score for each object, device, or user. We can then take action if they are at a higher risk."
    More Splunk Enterprise Security pros
     

    Cons

    "Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus."
    "Make it easier to include roles and user controls, as it is horrible now."
    "Licensing costs can be a barrier for those with limited budgets."
    "When you get into large amounts of data, Splunk can get pretty slow. This is the same on-premise or AWS, it doesn't matter. The way that they handle large data sets could be improved."
    "It would be good if the solution had some kind of copilot to automate or help write correlation searches."
    "It is a challenge to manage the environment in such a way, that one’s log, even with the bandwidth license, isn’t exceeded."
    "If we want to filter alerts, currently it's a very manual process. We identify IP addresses and usernames and must manually filter them."
    "I would like to see more SIEM functionality and a better ticket tool."
    "At Splunk .conf24, I saw a demo for Splunk Enterprise Security 8. All the things that they have done in Splunk Enterprise Security 8 are what it can be better at."
    More Splunk Enterprise Security cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "I don't have to put up with any longer with these hypercomplex licensing agreements. Every time I want to add some additional reporting as a compliance centric or regulatory specific, e.g., GDPR, PCI, or Sarbanes-Oxley, many providers would have an additional license for this, which felt a bit ridiculous to me. With the simplified licensing architecture, there were no hidden "gotchas" down the road with empow. Something I have experienced with other providers that I've worked with in the past."
    "With a higher degree of fidelity in the alarms, we were able to avoid adding additional resources to our teams. We take into account the cost of security resources in the market and the significantly higher fidelity from the alarms that are being generated. This drove down our costs with our MSSP. It drove down my cost for human capital internally. It drove down our need to have multiple resources supporting the underlying infrastructure and health and maintenance of empow as a platform from several resources down to one. Therefore, human capital costs were significantly reduced. Our operating expenses were significantly reduced. Our capital costs were significantly reduced while tripling our capacity and our run rate reduced. It was almost a "too good to be true" situation. Fortunately, for us, it worked out very nicely."
    "Expensive compared to other options."
    "Regarding the product's pricing, I think it has always been difficult to have a conversation with Splunk."
    "I assume that the pricing is reasonable, because if it was too costly, there are other alternatives."
    "Splunk Enterprise Security is a bit expensive overall, but it provides good value."
    "This product could use better pricing in general."
    "Most people share the same thought that the ingestion rates can get pretty pricey. There is a lot of work we do to curate the data that we send to Splunk so that it is not too noisy or too expensive."
    "I believe there is room for improvement in reducing costs, particularly in the financial aspect, as Splunk tends to be pricier compared to other options."
    "Free Splunk license for PoCs on personal machines and the ability to scale the PoC to an enterprise level app."
    More Splunk Enterprise Security pricing and cost advice
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    869,883 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Comparison Review

    VS
    Feb 26, 2015
    HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. ​McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm
    We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…
    Read full review
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Performing Arts
    12%
    Legal Firm
    9%
    Computer Software Company
    9%
    Financial Services Firm
    9%
    Computer Software Company
    14%
    Financial Services Firm
    13%
    Manufacturing Company
    8%
    Government
    7%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    No data available
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business110
    Midsize Enterprise50
    Large Enterprise257
     

    Questions from the Community

    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
    What SOC product do you recommend?
    For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
    See all answers
    What is a better choice, Splunk or Azure Sentinel?
    It would really depend on (1) which logs you need to ingest and (2) what are your use cases Splunk is easy for ingestion of anything, but the charge per GB/Day Indexed and it gets expensive as log ...
    See all answers
    How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
    Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
    See all answers
     

    Comparisons

    DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 68% of the time
    Netsurion vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    Netsurion vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 32% of the time
    More i-SIEM [EOL] Competitors
    IBM Security QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
    IBM Security QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
    Compared 8% of the time
    Wazuh vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
    Wazuh vs Splunk Enterprise Security
    Compared 6% of the time
    Dynatrace vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
    Dynatrace vs Splunk Enterprise Security
    Compared 6% of the time
    Datadog vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
    Datadog vs Splunk Enterprise Security
    Compared 5% of the time
    Security Onion vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
    Security Onion vs Splunk Enterprise Security
    Compared 4% of the time
    More Splunk Enterprise Security Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    September 2025
    i-SIEM [EOL] reportDownload i-SIEM [EOL] product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Splunk Enterprise Security
    September 2025
    Splunk Enterprise Security reportDownload Splunk Enterprise Security product report
     

    Overview

    i-SIEM [EOL] is an innovative security information and event management platform designed to enhance threat detection and response capabilities in IT environments.

    i-SIEM [EOL] offers a comprehensive approach to managing and analyzing security alerts, ensuring that businesses can effectively mitigate risks. With advanced threat intelligence and robust analytics, it helps organizations streamline their security operations and improve incident response times, providing each organization the information required to make informed security decisions.

    What are the most important features of i-SIEM [EOL]?
    • Real-time Monitoring: Continuously tracks network activity to detect potential threats.
    • Advanced Threat Detection: Utilizes AI to identify sophisticated attacks.
    • Customizable Dashboards: Allows users to tailor their view and focus on relevant data.
    • Automated Incident Response: Streamlines the response process by automating certain actions.
    • Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing business needs.
    What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?
    • Improved Security Posture: Enhanced monitoring capabilities reduce risk exposure.
    • Operational Efficiency: Automation cuts down manual efforts and saves time.
    • Increased Visibility: Comprehensive insights into activity improve decision-making.
    • Cost Management: Helps allocate resources more effectively, potentially reducing costs.

    i-SIEM [EOL] is particularly beneficial in industries such as finance and healthcare where data security is paramount. Its ability to integrate with existing infrastructure allows seamless adoption, offering enhanced security without disrupting operations. Industries handling sensitive information value its advanced capabilities to safeguard data integrity.

    Cybereason

    Splunk Enterprise Security delivers powerful log management, rapid searches, and intuitive dashboards, enhancing real-time analytics and security measures. Its advanced machine learning and wide system compatibility streamline threat detection and incident response across diverse IT environments.

    Splunk Enterprise Security stands out in security operations with robust features like comprehensive threat intelligence and seamless data integration. Its real-time analytics and customizable queries enable proactive threat analysis and efficient incident response. Integration with multiple third-party feeds allows detailed threat correlation and streamlined data visualization. Users find the intuitive UI and broad compatibility support efficient threat detection while reducing false positives. Despite its strengths, areas such as visualization capabilities and integration processes with cloud environments need enhancement. Users face a high learning curve, and improvements in automation, AI, documentation, and training are desired to maximize its potential.

    What Are the Key Features of Splunk Enterprise Security?
    • Log Management: Efficiently manages and organizes a vast amount of logs for better data handling.
    • Rapid Data Search: Quickly retrieves relevant data for fast decision-making.
    • Flexible Dashboards: Customizable dashboards provide clear data visualization.
    • Comprehensive Threat Intelligence: Offers detailed insights to preemptively defend against threats.
    • Real-Time Analytics: Analyzes data in real-time to enhance response times.
    • Integration with Third-Party Feeds: Streamlines information flow from multiple sources.
    What Benefits Should Users Investigate in Reviews?
    • Efficient Incident Response: Enhances the ability to respond promptly to threats.
    • False Positive Reduction: Minimizes incorrect threat alarms, making monitoring more efficient.
    • Threat Detection Speed: Accelerates the identification and evaluation of security threats.
    • Cost-Effectiveness: Potential savings through better licensing options and operational efficiency.
    • User Adaptability: Enhancements in documentation and training resources aid in overcoming the learning curve.

    In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Splunk Enterprise Security is instrumental for log aggregation, SIEM functionalities, and compliance monitoring. Companies leverage its capabilities for proactive threat analysis and response, ensuring comprehensive security monitoring and integration with various tools for heightened operational intelligence.

    Splunk
     

    Sample Customers

    University of Oklahoma, Donnelley
    Splunk has more than 7,000 customers spread across over 90 countries. These customers include Telenor, UniCredit, ideeli, McKenney's, Tesco, and SurveyMonkey.
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    September 2025
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Microsoft and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: September 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    869,883 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.