Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL] comparison

NETMONASTERY and Cybereason are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Additionally, 85% of NETMONASTERY users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cybereason users who would recommend it.
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Read 8 DNIF HYPERCLOUD reviews
  • 1,294 Views
  • 815 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
i-SIEM [EOL]
Read 1 i-SIEM [EOL] review
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

    DNIF HYPERCLOUD and i-SIEM [EOL] are competing in the SIEM space. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is often preferred for its competitive pricing, while i-SIEM [EOL] is selected for its extensive features that justify a higher cost.

    Features: DNIF HYPERCLOUD provides scalability, real-time analytics, and suitability for large-scale operations. i-SIEM [EOL] offers robust integrations, advanced threat intelligence, and broader feature sets necessary for deep integration and intelligence.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DNIF HYPERCLOUD's flexible deployment model adjusts to business needs, whereas i-SIEM [EOL] provides preconfigured options for reduced deployment time and smoother installation with superior support.

    Pricing and ROI: DNIF HYPERCLOUD appeals to cost-sensitive enterprises with lower setup costs and significant ROI. i-SIEM [EOL], despite a higher initial investment, offers superior returns with advanced capabilities and integrations appealing to those seeking long-term benefits.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: November 2025).
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    November 2025
    Download the complete report
    Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    DNIF HYPERCLOUD
    Average Rating
    7.6
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.7
    Number of Reviews
    8
    Ranking in other categories
    Log Management (49th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (53rd), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (21st), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (28th)
    i-SIEM [EOL]
    Average Rating
    9.0
    Number of Reviews
    1
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Kishore Tiwari - PeerSpot reviewer
    Kishore Tiwari
    Deputy General Manager - Information Security (Lead ISA) at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Development from open sources is very valuable but a huge infrastructure is required
    The solution's command line should be simpler so that routine commands can be used. The search configuration is a bit different than other OEMs or SIEM solutions like ArcSight or QRadar that are easy to search because they operate similarly. The logic is there and the solution supplies a pretty good explanation. Basically, DNIF spelled out is the opposite of FIND. You have to find commands whenever you want to search something. For example, a highway gets you to your destination but there is an alternate way people don't yet know about. Gartner or Forrester haven't yet studied it. We were a bit nervous when we were trying to get familiar with the solution. We wondered if we could realize ROI because the commands and ways of pulling data were different to us. We raised a case with the support team and their professionals provided the needed support. The command line is user friendly once you understand it. If you need immediate use, then you might want to get assistance from someone who is well-versed in methods for using key patterns to find things. Lengthier files for threat hunting or analysis are needed. The correlation happens, but exporting a large number of files to abstract them is not possible. For example, I want to present raw data to management so I should be able to customize a date range in my query and download the files.
    Read full review
    Dannie Combs - PeerSpot reviewer
    Dannie Combs
    Senior Vice President and Chief Information Security Officer at Donnelley Financial Solutions
    The alert fatigue and false positive rates have just plummeted, which is really exciting.
    empow has a few areas of improvement as with any other technology, such as continuing to drive innovation in the dashboard. While we've been extremely impressed with the dashboard's ease of use, flexibility, ability to drill down deeply, and focus very intently on an area of interest, there will always be opportunities to be more innovative and open it up to a wider audience than just the operations group, for example. With reporting, there is always a desire to have custom reporting for every client of empow. Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "I like the MITRE table, a feature I saw for the first time in the same solution. There was one MITRE tactic table, which can be used to identify threats if you have all kinds of rules enabled or if you have rules for all the tactics in the MITRE table. There are 14 tables in MITRE, and those 14 tables consist of multiple columns, tactics, and techniques. It was one of the first SIEM tools I saw that had that particular MITRE table. On that basis, you can create new rules and identify existing ones. At any point, if an alert is triggered, it will try to match it to any of those MITRE tactics. I liked that creating a workbook on MITRE business was straightforward. I also like that you can search using SQL or DQL."
    "The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of EPS it can handle."
    "The beauty of the solution is that you can develop infrastructure for a data lake using open sources that are separate from the licenses."
    "The response time on queries is super-fast."
    "Has a great search capability."
    "Great for scaling productivity for log monitoring purposes."
    "The dashboard is helpful, and it creates visualizations to let staff review event data and identify patterns and anomalies."
    "The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable."
    More DNIF HYPERCLOUD pros
    "As a result of the automation, we are able to manage SIEM with a small security team. I'm in a unique position where we have been growing the security organization quite rapidly over the last three and a half years. But, as a direct result of the empow transition and legacy collection of tools towards the empow platform, we've been able to keep that head count flat. We've been able to redirect a lot of the security team's time away from the wash, rinse, repeat activities of responding to alarms where we have a high degree of confidence that they will be false positives, adjusting the rules accordingly. This can be a bit frustrating for the analyst when they have to spend hours a day dealing with these types of probable false positives. So, it has helped not only us keep our headcount flat relative to the resources necessary to provide the assurances that our executives expect of us for monitoring, but allows our analyst team to spend the majority of their time doing what they love. They are spending their time meaningfully with a higher degree of confidence and enjoying getting into the incident response type activity."
     

    Cons

    "The solution's command line should be simpler so that routine commands can be used."
    "Dependency on the DNIF support team was frustrating."
    "I feel that DNIF needs to invest more in marketing, considering that it operates at a very competitive speed."
    "I think DNIF HYPERCLOUD can implement the ability to export more than 100,000. At the moment, we can't go beyond that. So many times, if you're checking for the firewall logs and working on something related to authentication or network-related traffic, while that log count is low, the account goes beyond that. You can't restrict the logs or the amount of data you can export. It's very important for my situation. It would be better if they could increase the capacity of exports. Although there are many more types of searching in DNIF HYPERCLOUD, people still struggle to query out what they want because not everyone is good at SQL or DQL. The easiest way to query out in DNIF is using the GUI-based interface. But in the GUI interface, you can use operator calls. It gets tricky when you want to search for a specific type of event. You don't know where it will be passed and whether it will be consistent. In the initial phase, it's tough for us to use DNIF. You cannot pass every event in a stable DNIF. When we used that particular tool, we used to get those logs, but sometimes many things are not getting passed. So, we used to export the sheet or export the data into Excel and weigh the required details. In the next release, I would like them to improve the export of the columns and make the application more user-friendly. I would also like a threat-hunting feature in the next release."
    "The EBA could be improved."
    "The solution should be able to connect to endpoints, such as desktops and laptops... If this solution had a smart connector to these logs- Windows, Linux, or any other logs - without affecting the performance of the connector, that would be wonderful."
    "The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time."
    "There are currently some issues with machine learning plug-ins."
    "Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "The solution requires a huge infrastructure and that is costly."
    "The pricing is based on the log size."
    "Price-wise, the product is quite economical. I rate the solution's price as three or four on a scale of one to ten, where one is considered to be a very economically priced tool."
    "I don't have to put up with any longer with these hypercomplex licensing agreements. Every time I want to add some additional reporting as a compliance centric or regulatory specific, e.g., GDPR, PCI, or Sarbanes-Oxley, many providers would have an additional license for this, which felt a bit ridiculous to me. With the simplified licensing architecture, there were no hidden "gotchas" down the road with empow. Something I have experienced with other providers that I've worked with in the past."
    "With a higher degree of fidelity in the alarms, we were able to avoid adding additional resources to our teams. We take into account the cost of security resources in the market and the significantly higher fidelity from the alarms that are being generated. This drove down our costs with our MSSP. It drove down my cost for human capital internally. It drove down our need to have multiple resources supporting the underlying infrastructure and health and maintenance of empow as a platform from several resources down to one. Therefore, human capital costs were significantly reduced. Our operating expenses were significantly reduced. Our capital costs were significantly reduced while tripling our capacity and our run rate reduced. It was almost a "too good to be true" situation. Fortunately, for us, it worked out very nicely."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Transportation Company
    9%
    Manufacturing Company
    7%
    Performing Arts
    6%
    Construction Company
    6%
    Performing Arts
    11%
    Legal Firm
    9%
    Manufacturing Company
    7%
    Financial Services Firm
    7%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business3
    Midsize Enterprise1
    Large Enterprise3
    No data available
     

    Questions from the Community

    What needs improvement with DNIF HYPERCLOUD?
    A lot of people don't know about DNIF HYPERCLOUD, but they do know about products like Splunk, QRadar, ArcSight, and some other SIEM solutions. DNIF is not a known name in the market. From an impro...
    See all answers
    What is your primary use case for DNIF HYPERCLOUD?
    DNIF HYPERCLOUD is a good SIEM solution. One of the tools' features is very high scalability in terms of the events generated per second. The product is aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework....
    See all answers
    What advice do you have for others considering DNIF HYPERCLOUD?
    The tool's ability in the area of its analytic capabilities has enhanced our company's security poster in a good way, especially when compared to some of the other competitors in the market, like S...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Splunk Enterprise Security vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
    Splunk Enterprise Security vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
    Compared 22% of the time
    Seceon Open Threat Management Platform vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
    Seceon Open Threat Management Platform vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
    Compared 12% of the time
    IBM Security QRadar vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
    IBM Security QRadar vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
    Compared 10% of the time
    Elastic Security vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
    Elastic Security vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
    Compared 10% of the time
    Fortinet FortiSIEM vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
    Fortinet FortiSIEM vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
    Compared 8% of the time
    More DNIF HYPERCLOUD Competitors
    Netsurion vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    Netsurion vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 27% of the time
    Trellix ESM vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    Trellix ESM vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 21% of the time
    Splunk Enterprise Security vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    Splunk Enterprise Security vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 16% of the time
    More i-SIEM [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    DNIF HYPERCLOUD
    December 2025
    DNIF HYPERCLOUD reportDownload DNIF HYPERCLOUD product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    November 2025
    i-SIEM [EOL] reportDownload i-SIEM [EOL] product report
     

    Overview

    DNIF HYPERCLOUD is a cloud native platform that brings the functionality of SIEM, UEBA and SOAR into a single continuous workflow to solve cybersecurity challenges at scale. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is the flagship SaaS platform from NETMONASTERY that delivers key detection functionality using big data analytics and machine learning. NETMONASTERY aims to deliver a platform that helps customers in ingesting machine data and automatically identify anomalies in these data streams using machine learning and outlier detection algorithms. The objective is to make it easy for untrained engineers and analysts to use the platform and extract benefit reliably and efficiently.

    NETMONASTERY

    i-SIEM [EOL] is an innovative security information and event management platform designed to enhance threat detection and response capabilities in IT environments.

    i-SIEM [EOL] offers a comprehensive approach to managing and analyzing security alerts, ensuring that businesses can effectively mitigate risks. With advanced threat intelligence and robust analytics, it helps organizations streamline their security operations and improve incident response times, providing each organization the information required to make informed security decisions.

    What are the most important features of i-SIEM [EOL]?
    • Real-time Monitoring: Continuously tracks network activity to detect potential threats.
    • Advanced Threat Detection: Utilizes AI to identify sophisticated attacks.
    • Customizable Dashboards: Allows users to tailor their view and focus on relevant data.
    • Automated Incident Response: Streamlines the response process by automating certain actions.
    • Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing business needs.
    What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?
    • Improved Security Posture: Enhanced monitoring capabilities reduce risk exposure.
    • Operational Efficiency: Automation cuts down manual efforts and saves time.
    • Increased Visibility: Comprehensive insights into activity improve decision-making.
    • Cost Management: Helps allocate resources more effectively, potentially reducing costs.

    i-SIEM [EOL] is particularly beneficial in industries such as finance and healthcare where data security is paramount. Its ability to integrate with existing infrastructure allows seamless adoption, offering enhanced security without disrupting operations. Industries handling sensitive information value its advanced capabilities to safeguard data integrity.

    Cybereason
     

    Sample Customers

    Mahindra & Mahindra, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), ICICI Bank, Yes Bank, Tata Motors, RBL Bank
    University of Oklahoma, Donnelley
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    November 2025
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Microsoft and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: November 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.