Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix ESM vs i-SIEM [EOL] comparison

Cybereason and Trellix are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Additionally, 100% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
i-SIEM [EOL]
Read 1 i-SIEM [EOL] review
    100% willing to recommend
    Trellix ESM
    Read 38 Trellix ESM reviews
    • 1,755 Views
    • 1,580 Comparison Views
    76% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

    Trellix ESM and i-SIEM [EOL] compete in the SIEM landscape. i-SIEM [EOL] appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and perceived value, while Trellix ESM has strengths in pricing and support.

    Features: Trellix ESM offers advanced analytics capabilities, integration with security operations, and robust threat detection and response mechanisms. i-SIEM [EOL] provides flexibility, scalability, and adaptability for diverse environments, catering to varied organizational needs.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ESM has a straightforward deployment process with substantial support. i-SIEM [EOL], although highly customizable, may require more configuration but provides adequate customer service for new users.

    Pricing and ROI: Trellix ESM is known for competitive pricing and clear ROI, attractive for cost-conscious organizations with upfront investment aligning with long-term savings. i-SIEM [EOL], potentially more expensive initially, offers strong ROI through its adaptable infrastructure, yielding increased efficiency and performance over time.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: November 2025).
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    November 2025
    Download the complete report
    Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    i-SIEM [EOL]
    Average Rating
    9.0
    Number of Reviews
    1
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
    Trellix ESM
    Average Rating
    7.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.0
    Number of Reviews
    38
    Ranking in other categories
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (25th)
     

    Featured Reviews

    Dannie Combs - PeerSpot reviewer
    Dannie Combs
    Senior Vice President and Chief Information Security Officer at Donnelley Financial Solutions
    The alert fatigue and false positive rates have just plummeted, which is really exciting.
    empow has a few areas of improvement as with any other technology, such as continuing to drive innovation in the dashboard. While we've been extremely impressed with the dashboard's ease of use, flexibility, ability to drill down deeply, and focus very intently on an area of interest, there will always be opportunities to be more innovative and open it up to a wider audience than just the operations group, for example. With reporting, there is always a desire to have custom reporting for every client of empow. Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus.
    Read full review
    MD
    Mohit Dhingra
    Senior Vice President IT at AS IT Consulting Pvt. Ltd.
    Offers comprehensive report generation while maintaining ease of integration
    We need to improve Trellix ESM by making sure that most of the logging devices available in the global market should be covered, and if there is any device which is not covered, there should not be any additional charges for writing the custom parsers on that. We can add some new features regarding AI in the future for Trellix ESM, but the maturity will take a longer time. There are many false positives that happen in an environment during the first couple of months, or around six months, so the system analyst is not able to identify whether the event which has occurred is a true positive or a false positive.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "As a result of the automation, we are able to manage SIEM with a small security team. I'm in a unique position where we have been growing the security organization quite rapidly over the last three and a half years. But, as a direct result of the empow transition and legacy collection of tools towards the empow platform, we've been able to keep that head count flat. We've been able to redirect a lot of the security team's time away from the wash, rinse, repeat activities of responding to alarms where we have a high degree of confidence that they will be false positives, adjusting the rules accordingly. This can be a bit frustrating for the analyst when they have to spend hours a day dealing with these types of probable false positives. So, it has helped not only us keep our headcount flat relative to the resources necessary to provide the assurances that our executives expect of us for monitoring, but allows our analyst team to spend the majority of their time doing what they love. They are spending their time meaningfully with a higher degree of confidence and enjoying getting into the incident response type activity."
    "The product’s most valuable feature is log monitoring."
    "We are now able to completely monitor our environment so we can review what is there, which is a big win for us."
    "The most valuable feature in ESM is its search and reporting feature. It's really nice."
    "The solution's technical support is great."
    "The most valuable feature is that if the scanning does find something, it quarantines it. Then you can decide what you are going to do with it."
    "It is a good central viewpoint for issues. These can then be investigated in more detail on the subnet server(s)/endpoints."
    "The most valuable feature is the capability to correlate different events from different platforms that we feed into it."
    "Scalability is quite easier with Trellix ESM, because all we need to do is add more receivers to it, so it can go to any point."
    More Trellix ESM pros
     

    Cons

    "Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus."
    "There are always multiple bugs in the product. For example, the console page was hanging multiple times. Afterwards, they released multiple upgrades for the same, multiple patches from McAfee."
    "McAfee ESM is not user-friendly and the log is not accurate. For instance, if I were assigned to generate a log for changes made today, I wouldn't be able to see all the modifications. While Palo Alto allows us to see all changes, McAfee ESM only captures one out of every ten changes. It's crucial to have visibility into all changes made."
    "The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
    "Product-wise, adding accounts on a single data source by batch would be a really great help."
    "The product is mature and needs little improvement, but we could enhance the customized dashboarding based on use cases."
    "I would like to see fingerprint recognition included in the next release of this solution."
    "There's no software support from McAfee."
    "It seems McAfee does test its product before releasing. When we - not only us, other companies also - deploy McAfee, we face multiple issues from the customer side, after which, McAfee reacts and fixes the bugs."
    More Trellix ESM cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "With a higher degree of fidelity in the alarms, we were able to avoid adding additional resources to our teams. We take into account the cost of security resources in the market and the significantly higher fidelity from the alarms that are being generated. This drove down our costs with our MSSP. It drove down my cost for human capital internally. It drove down our need to have multiple resources supporting the underlying infrastructure and health and maintenance of empow as a platform from several resources down to one. Therefore, human capital costs were significantly reduced. Our operating expenses were significantly reduced. Our capital costs were significantly reduced while tripling our capacity and our run rate reduced. It was almost a "too good to be true" situation. Fortunately, for us, it worked out very nicely."
    "I don't have to put up with any longer with these hypercomplex licensing agreements. Every time I want to add some additional reporting as a compliance centric or regulatory specific, e.g., GDPR, PCI, or Sarbanes-Oxley, many providers would have an additional license for this, which felt a bit ridiculous to me. With the simplified licensing architecture, there were no hidden "gotchas" down the road with empow. Something I have experienced with other providers that I've worked with in the past."
    "You should buy the distributed option instead of the all-in-one for environments with more than 1000 end points."
    "When compared to IBM Security QRadar and other similar platforms, the pricing of McAfee ESM is reasonable and comparatively less expensive."
    "Regarding pricing, Trellix ESM is not that expensive. It's less than half the cost of IBM QRadar."
    "McAfee is the right choice for a low-budget solution."
    "The product is slightly expensive."
    "It is an inexpensive product. We purchase its yearly license."
    "The pricing is good, and they are competitive compared to providers such as RSA and IBM QRadar."
    "The pricing is fair."
    More Trellix ESM pricing and cost advice
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Comparison Review

    VS
    Vinod Shankar
    Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Feb 26, 2015
    HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. ​McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm
    We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…
    Read full review
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Performing Arts
    11%
    Legal Firm
    9%
    Manufacturing Company
    7%
    Financial Services Firm
    7%
    Comms Service Provider
    16%
    Financial Services Firm
    9%
    Manufacturing Company
    9%
    Computer Software Company
    7%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    No data available
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business15
    Midsize Enterprise6
    Large Enterprise24
     

    Questions from the Community

    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee ESM?
    When discussing Trellix ESM pricing and licensing, if you consider some premium product, the pricing also has to be premium, however, enterprise customers who look for a premium product, alongside ...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with McAfee ESM?
    Areas of Trellix ESM that could be improved or enhanced include checking on the clients who are still on-prem, especially banks, as most are not moving everything to the cloud due to confidentialit...
    See all answers
    What is your primary use case for McAfee ESM?
    My customer's usual use case for Trellix ESM involves one client, as most of the users have moved to ESM. Nowadays, they don't use IPS only, since McAfee IPS is standalone; they incorporate firewal...
    See all answers
     

    Comparisons

    DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 36% of the time
    Netsurion vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    Netsurion vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 27% of the time
    Splunk Enterprise Security vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    Splunk Enterprise Security vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 16% of the time
    More i-SIEM [EOL] Competitors
    OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Trellix ESM Logo
    OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Trellix ESM
    Compared 25% of the time
    IBM Security QRadar vs Trellix ESM Logo
    IBM Security QRadar vs Trellix ESM
    Compared 14% of the time
    SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix ESM Logo
    SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix ESM
    Compared 12% of the time
    Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM Logo
    Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM
    Compared 11% of the time
    LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM Logo
    LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM
    Compared 7% of the time
    More Trellix ESM Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    November 2025
    i-SIEM [EOL] reportDownload i-SIEM [EOL] product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Trellix ESM
    December 2025
    Trellix ESM reportDownload Trellix ESM product report
     

    Also Known As

    No data available
    McAfee ESM, NitroSecurity, McAfee Enterprise Security Manager
     

    Overview

    i-SIEM [EOL] is an innovative security information and event management platform designed to enhance threat detection and response capabilities in IT environments.

    i-SIEM [EOL] offers a comprehensive approach to managing and analyzing security alerts, ensuring that businesses can effectively mitigate risks. With advanced threat intelligence and robust analytics, it helps organizations streamline their security operations and improve incident response times, providing each organization the information required to make informed security decisions.

    What are the most important features of i-SIEM [EOL]?
    • Real-time Monitoring: Continuously tracks network activity to detect potential threats.
    • Advanced Threat Detection: Utilizes AI to identify sophisticated attacks.
    • Customizable Dashboards: Allows users to tailor their view and focus on relevant data.
    • Automated Incident Response: Streamlines the response process by automating certain actions.
    • Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing business needs.
    What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?
    • Improved Security Posture: Enhanced monitoring capabilities reduce risk exposure.
    • Operational Efficiency: Automation cuts down manual efforts and saves time.
    • Increased Visibility: Comprehensive insights into activity improve decision-making.
    • Cost Management: Helps allocate resources more effectively, potentially reducing costs.

    i-SIEM [EOL] is particularly beneficial in industries such as finance and healthcare where data security is paramount. Its ability to integrate with existing infrastructure allows seamless adoption, offering enhanced security without disrupting operations. Industries handling sensitive information value its advanced capabilities to safeguard data integrity.

    Cybereason

    Make your organization more resilient and confident with Trellix Security Operations. Filter out the noise and cut complexity to deliver faster, more effective SecOps. Integrate your existing security tools and connect with over 650 Trellix solutions and third-party products.

    Trellix
     

    Sample Customers

    University of Oklahoma, Donnelley
    San Francisco Police Credit Union, Wªstenrot Gruppe, Volusion, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Government of New Brunswick, State of Colorado, Macquarie Telecom, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Cologne Bonn Airport
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    November 2025
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Microsoft and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: November 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.