HPE StoreEasy vs Panasas ActiveStor comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
1,997 views|1,484 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Panasas Logo
365 views|262 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE StoreEasy and Panasas ActiveStor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two NAS solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed HPE StoreEasy vs. Panasas ActiveStor Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Aditya Utama
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the tool's provisioning feature and OneView.""I like the user quotas, integrations, and separations for storage.""The most valuable feature of HPE StoreEasy is the storing of virtual machines.""I can use both the on-premises and cloud storage options. I need to have an APR extension from StoreEasy, and it's that simple.""This solution allows me to better and more easily manage user data without impacting my primary storage.""The solution's most valuable feature is the duplication."

More HPE StoreEasy Pros →

"I am impressed with the tool's performance and bandwidth.""We've found the product to be quite flexible."

More Panasas ActiveStor Pros →

Cons
"When I configure the StoreEasy in a complex environment I have problems finding compatibility with all the software.""The cluster service is not available in the latest version of HPE StoreEasy.""We need some monitoring tools and it would be helpful if they were included.""I would like to improve the tool's technical support. I would also like to see the product's hybrid cloud version.""The support of HPE StoreEasy can improve its responsiveness. Dell support is better.""It would be better if it were more scalable. In the next release, I would like to access some Microsoft Windows storage server features. I guess the newest version of Windows Server has some restrictions."

More HPE StoreEasy Cons →

"The solution is quite expensive.""We have received complaints from customers that the tool is not easy to use. The tool's local technical service is slow. The solution is good for Linux customers and not for customers with other operating systems like Windows. The solution should provide storage without client software integration."

More Panasas ActiveStor Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is an economical solution for the company and I am satisfied with the pricing."
  • "The price of HPE StoreEasy is approximately $15,000 to $20,000 and it is a one-time purchase. The price is similar to competitors, such as Dell."
  • "I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. You need to pay additional costs for the solution."
  • More HPE StoreEasy Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution's price is reasonable."
  • More Panasas ActiveStor Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I like the tool's provisioning feature and OneView.
    Top Answer:I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. You need to pay additional costs for the solution.
    Top Answer:I would like to improve the tool's technical support. I would also like to see the product's hybrid cloud version.
    Top Answer:I am impressed with the tool's performance and bandwidth.
    Top Answer:We have received complaints from customers that the tool is not easy to use. The tool's local technical service is slow. The solution is good for Linux customers and not for customers with other… more »
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 27 in NAS
    Views
    1,997
    Comparisons
    1,484
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    206
    Rating
    8.0
    14th
    out of 27 in NAS
    Views
    365
    Comparisons
    262
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    252
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HP StoreEasy
    ActiveStor
    Learn More
    Overview
    HP StoreEasy Storage is the #1 NAS product family under $15K USD range in units. Count on optimized, efficient, secure and highly available storage that simply addresses file and application storage challenges, no matter the size of your business. Straightforward features and new enhancements mean simpler installation and monitoring of utilization and health status.

    In our most recent product, the ActiveStor Ultra, Panasas has developed a new approach called Dynamic Data Acceleration Technology. It uses a carefully balanced set of HDDs, SATA SSD, NVMe SSD, NVDIMM, and DRAM to provide a combination of excellent performance and low cost per terabyte.

    • HDDs will provide high bandwidth data storage if they are never asked to store anything small and only asked to do large sequential transfers. Therefore, we only store large Component Objects on our low-cost HDDs.

    • SATA SSDs provide cost-effective and highbandwidth storage as a result of not having any seek times, so that’s where we keep our small Component Objects.

    • NVMe SSDs are built for very low latency accesses, so we store all our metadata in a database and keep that database on an NVMe SSD. Metadata accesses are very sensitive to latency, whether it is POSIX metadata for the files being stored or metadata for the internal operations of the OSD.

    • An NVDIMM (a storage class memory device) is the lowest latency type of persistent storage device available, and we use one to store our transaction logs: user data and metadata being written by the application to the OSD, plus our internal metadata. That allows PanFS to provide very low latency commits back to the application.

    • We use the DRAM in each OSD as an extremely low latency cache of the most recently read or written data and metadata.

    To gain the most benefit from the SATA SSD’s performance, we try to keep the SATA SSD about 80% full. If it falls below that, we will (transparently and in the background) pick the smallest Component Objects in the HDD pool and move them to the SSD until it is about 80% full. If the SSD is too full, we will move the largest Component Objects on the SSD to the HDD pool. Every ActiveStor Ultra Storage Node performs this optimization independently and continuously. It’s easy for an ActiveStor Ultra to pick which Component Objects to move, it just needs to look in its local NVMe-based database.

    Sample Customers
    John Lewis, HPE IT, Comline AG, AmeriPride Services
    Advanced Mask Technology Center Airbus Argonne National Laboratory The University of Texas at Dallas School of Arts Technology and Emerging Communication Башнефть Boeing Bosch California Academy of Sciences Caltech Canon Case Western Reserve University Conoco Phillips Deluxe DirecTV Fairfield Technologies United States Federal Reserve Garvan Institute of Medical Research Goodyear Halliburton Harvard Medical School Honeywell In-Depth Geophysical Intel Kawasaki Lockheed Martin 3M Magseis Fairfield Mammal Studios The Man Group McLaren Mercedes-Benz MINES ParisTech NASA US Navy National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center NBCUniversal National Institutes of Health Nio National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Northrup Grumman Novartis Partners Healthcare Procter & Gamble PGS Pratt & Whitney Rutherford Appleton Lab Siemens Sim International Sinopec Solers Square Cnix TGS Toyota Motorsport GMBH Toppan Turner UMass Medical School United Technologies University of Georgia University of California Los Angeles University of Minnesota University of Notre Dame University of California San Diego Center for Microbiome Innovation Whiskytree
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    University11%
    Educational Organization9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    HPE StoreEasy vs. Panasas ActiveStor
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE StoreEasy vs. Panasas ActiveStor and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE StoreEasy is ranked 8th in NAS with 7 reviews while Panasas ActiveStor is ranked 14th in NAS with 2 reviews. HPE StoreEasy is rated 8.2, while Panasas ActiveStor is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of HPE StoreEasy writes "Good backup solution for applications that is also scalable and stable ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Panasas ActiveStor writes "A stable solution with good performance and bandwidth". HPE StoreEasy is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon), NetApp FAS Series, Qumulo, FreeNAS and IBM Scale-out NAS, whereas Panasas ActiveStor is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon) and NetApp FAS Series. See our HPE StoreEasy vs. Panasas ActiveStor report.

    See our list of best NAS vendors.

    We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.