HPE StoreEasy vs NetApp FAS Series comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and NetApp are both solutions in the NAS category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8, while NetApp is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 3.1% mindshare in N, compared to NetApp’s 10.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

HPE StoreEasy

Read 12 HPE StoreEasy reviews

1,926 Views
1,926 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

NetApp FAS Series

Read 110 NetApp FAS Series reviews

10,169 Views
5,186 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

HPE StoreEasy

NetApp FAS Series

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

NetApp FAS Series and HPE StoreEasy both compete in the storage solutions category, targeting performance-heavy and cost-effective environments respectively. NetApp appears to have the upper hand in advanced features, while HPE stands out for affordability and ease of use.

Features: NetApp FAS Series is noted for features like high availability, Snap technologies, and protocol flexibility. These contribute to efficient storage management and seamless virtualization integration. HPE StoreEasy, on the other hand, is recognized for its reliability, simplicity in operation, and solid storage capabilities, despite lacking some of NetApp's advanced functions.

Room for Improvement: NetApp users suggest improving documentation, simplifying performance monitoring, and reducing costs. Enhancing backward compatibility and speeding up firmware updates are also desired. HPE StoreEasy could focus on scalability, better cloud integration, and improving technical support, all essential for meeting market expectations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both NetApp and HPE StoreEasy excel in ease of deployment. NetApp offers hybrid cloud integration, adding flexibility, and is praised for its responsive technical support. HPE StoreEasy matches in deployment ease and receives satisfactory customer service feedback, though it could expand its support capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp is often considered expensive, with costs justified by significant ROI and storage savings due to efficiency features. HPE StoreEasy is viewed as more affordable, aligning well with budget-conscious users, and provides good value, though additional costs may occur for extra features. Both systems generally ensure meaningful ROI, with NetApp appealing to high-end needs and HPE offering budget-friendly options.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE StoreEasy vs. NetApp FAS Series Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. NetApp FAS Series

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE StoreEasy

Ranking in NAS

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp FAS Series

Ranking in NAS

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

110

Ranking in other categories

Deduplication Software (4th), Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE StoreEasy is 3.1%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp FAS Series is 10.6%, down from 11.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NetApp FAS Series	10.6%
HPE StoreEasy	3.1%
Other	86.3%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Vinoth Bala

HPE Consultant at Mannai

Reliable, cost-effective, and easy to deploy and manage

I did not have any difficulties in deploying StoreEasy for the customers. It is user-friendly and easy to deploy. It has a Windows Server and a required license built in. For implementation, we follow the HPE documentation. We follow the Configuration guide and the Installation guide. For all HPE products, we follow the HPE documentation. For a single box, it takes a maximum of two days. It depends on the customer's availability. For different configurations, it can take two to three days. The number of people required varies from customer to customer, but generally, it requires three people. For mounting the storage, we always have three people to unbox, mount, and do other things. It does not require any maintenance. From the data center perspective, maintaining StoreEasy is very easy. No customer has complained about any difficulty in maintaining StoreEasy.

Read full review

Srikanth Purushothaman

DIRECTOR at Vellore Online Systems

Has supported long-term data protection and backup while requiring better part availability and pricing options

For monitoring purposes, we normally use flash access storage exclusively. We utilize a hybrid system because we need performance, combining NL-SAS for the volume and SAS flash to use as a fast cache system that provides more IOPS. We normally implement RAID 10, which we prefer over RAID 6's n plus 2 combinations. We utilize it for data redundancy, even with write intensity on. Regarding the unified storage architecture for NetApp FAS Series, we normally opt for exclusivity unless budget constraints exist. Our IOPS are very high, reaching somewhere about 50k to 150k or 1.150k. The high performance ensures minimal latency. An advantage we've seen with NetApp FAS Series is that snapshots provide very rapid backup and fast recovery. We basically use snapshots for data protection as first-level protection, with deduplication between the two storages serving as second-level protection.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a robust system, reliable, and well-priced."

"The solution is very good."

"I can use both the on-premises and cloud storage options. I need to have an APR extension from StoreEasy, and it's that simple."

"HPE StoreEasy is a stable and high-performing solution that HPE supports effectively."

"StoreEasy is a better solution for backup purposes."

"The tool's data protection capabilities are robust."

"It is easy to manage. There is a management console that comes with StoreEasy. It simplifies managing storage permission. There is snapshot scheduling as well. The updates and everything else is good."

"The most beneficial feature of HPE StoreEasy for us is its easy implementation and maintenance."

More HPE StoreEasy pros

"The migration of the volume on the cluster is very useful and easy to use."

"It is very easy to expand disks and manage CIFS."

"Reliable storage solution with an easy setup. It has high availability and makes single file restoration easy. It also has good stability and scalability."

"Reliability performance level, great history with it, and over the last two and a half years, it's been better than others."

"Good for NAS and unified solutions."

"The solution has tiers inside which means we do not only need to use SSDs."

"It offers data compression and people management."

"Enables us to handle business critical data with HA."

More NetApp FAS Series pros

Cons

"The areas of HPE StoreEasy that need improvement are scalability and migration."

"There are some SKUs in StoreEasy that are built to order, and there are only limited options, such as StoreEasy 1670 and 1870, which can be configured to order based on customer preferences."

"When I configure the StoreEasy in a complex environment I have problems finding compatibility with all the software."

"It would be better if it were more scalable. In the next release, I would like to access some Microsoft Windows storage server features. I guess the newest version of Windows Server has some restrictions."

"StoreEasy has a huge scalability issue."

"The support of HPE StoreEasy can improve its responsiveness. Dell support is better."

"We need some monitoring tools and it would be helpful if they were included."

"I would like to improve the tool's technical support. I would also like to see the product's hybrid cloud version."

More HPE StoreEasy cons

"Integration with most of the third-party BR tools and a clear roadmap for next releases should be available."

"Migration from 7-Mode to Clustered Data ONTAP need improvement. It seems NetApp didn't know how to solve the main problem of migrating data from an old OS (7-Mode ) to Clustered."

"One of the issues that we have had with NetApp in upgrading over the years is that migrating data from one system to another is one-way only."

"I'll give technical support a "good" rating because sometimes it's slow in getting people to respond, other times it's okay."

"As I see it, there could be more interfaces, more cache, etc., but those challenges are solved by just getting some other model."

"Between NetApp and HP, we chose HP because the NetApp support is not very good."

"Lately, a little slow to respond, but once you get someone, they’re very knowledgeable, although I haven’t had to use it a lot."

"NetApp FAS Series should improve its price, which is expensive."

More NetApp FAS Series cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. You need to pay additional costs for the solution."

"The price of HPE StoreEasy is approximately $15,000 to $20,000 and it is a one-time purchase. The price is similar to competitors, such as Dell."

"This is an economical solution for the company and I am satisfied with the pricing."

"Based on what I hear from our customers, it is not very expensive. From the cost perspective, I see nobody complaining about its cost."

"NetApp FAS Series could be less expensive."

"We purchased it for four years, and it wasn't expensive. It was reasonable. Every company has a different agreement with NetApp. We got everything we wanted with all the bells and whistles and all the features and functionalities."

"I've sold arrays for as little $20,000 USD and as high as $300,000 USD."

"The product is on the expensive side."

"The process for going to cluster mode is expensive."

"It is a one-time license charge for NetApp FAS Series to run and we pay annually for upgrades and support."

"Cost effective storage for all performance levels (including all-flash)."

"it’s not an inexpensive solution and it may not be for the cost-sensitive customer."

More NetApp FAS Series pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	38
Large Enterprise	58

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE StoreEasy?

HPE StoreEasy is competitively priced compared to competitors. It offers configuration options, such as different processor powers, to adapt to the client's needs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE StoreEasy?

The product is stable, running on Windows Server ( /products/windows-server-reviews ) with updates from HPE, including those for iLO. There could be improvements in providing more hardening options...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE StoreEasy?

I use HPE StoreEasy ( /products/hpe-storeeasy-reviews ) to provide file sharing to our business users. We are a logistics business, specifically a port.

See all answers

Which SAN product would you choose: IBM FlashSystem (FS9500) vs PureFlash Array/X NVMe vs PureFlash Array/XL NVMe?

Have you considered a NetApp FAS Storage for your NAS needs? I am sure it fits very well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp FAS Series?

I do not handle the pricing part of NetApp FAS Series since it is managed by the sales team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp FAS Series?

There is room for improvement when it comes to response time and first-level support quality. If a new feature needs to be added, it takes some time because it is altogether a new development; othe...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 31% of the time

IBM Scale-out NAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 11% of the time

QNAP NAS Storage vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 8% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 7% of the time

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE StoreEasy Competitors

Dell PowerScale vs NetApp FAS Series

Compared 26% of the time

Qumulo vs NetApp FAS Series

Compared 5% of the time

HPE MSA vs NetApp FAS Series

Compared 4% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs NetApp FAS Series

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance vs NetApp FAS Series

Compared 2% of the time

More NetApp FAS Series Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAS

May 2026

Download HPE StoreEasy product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp FAS Series

June 2026

Download NetApp FAS Series product report

Also Known As

HP StoreEasy

No data available

Overview

HPE StoreEasy provides storage and file sharing, offering ease of use, data protection, and scalable performance. It integrates well, is cost-effective, and supports on-premises and cloud storage. However, it needs better feature accessibility and scalability enhancements.

HPE StoreEasy is a versatile NAS storage solution known for its reliable file services and robust data protection features. It is favored for its ease of deployment and hybrid storage capabilities, catering to a range of storage needs from virtualization to backup purposes. The management console enables efficient control, while its integration with virtual machines enhances utility in dynamic IT environments. Despite its strengths, there are areas that require attention, like compatibility with various software and scalability improvements.

What are the core features of HPE StoreEasy?

Ease of Use: User-friendly interface for hassle-free management.
Data Duplication: Efficient data storage and retrieval.
VM Storage: Supports virtual machine data management.
User Quotas: Manages and limits storage per user.
Integration: Seamless connection with existing systems.
Data Protection: Advanced protection against data loss.
Snapshot Scheduling: Regularly captures system states.
Cloud Replication: Syncs data to cloud services.
Hybrid Storage: Combines on-premises and cloud solutions.

What are the benefits and ROI of HPE StoreEasy?

Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive price per terabyte ratio.
Scalability: Expandable hardware options for growing needs.
Management Efficiency: Centralized control through the console.
Reliability: Consistent performance for critical tasks.

HPE StoreEasy finds applications across different sectors, predominantly in NAS storage and file sharing. It supports logistics by maintaining separate user and server data, assists in virtualization, and solves capacity issues in data centers. Many enterprises use it as a robust alternative when current NAS systems face challenges.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

NetApp FAS Series offers high availability and seamless protocol integration. Known for its robust features such as data replication and efficient storage architecture, it finds use in challenging enterprise environments and virtualization.

NetApp FAS Series delivers valuable enterprise storage capabilities with an emphasis on unified storage architectures supporting SAN and NAS functionalities. Features like high availability, robust snapshot technology, and seamless protocol integration cater to diverse workloads. Data replication through SnapMirror and reliable performance under heavy loads are appreciated. Deduplication and compression enhance storage efficiency while scalability, resilience, and strong customer support further its appeal. Improvements are desired in flexibility, documentation, speed, and affordability. Additionally, its monitoring capabilities and cloud integration need attention. Organizations employ FAS Series for enterprise storage, SQL Server LUNs, Exchange LUNs, VMware, and corporate file sharing.

What are the most notable features of NetApp FAS Series?

High Availability: Ensures continuous access and reduces downtime.
Snapshot Technology: Offers point-in-time copies for data recovery.
SnapMirror: Provides efficient data replication for disaster recovery.
Storage Efficiency: Deduplication and compression optimize storage use.
Cloud Integration: Enhances flexibility with cloud environments.

What benefits should be examined in reviews?

Scalability: Supports expanding storage needs without performance loss.
Reliability: Maintains robust performance under heavy workloads.
Strong Support: Access to helpful customer service resources.
Cost Efficiency: Consider value in context of feature set and performance.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, NetApp FAS Series is implemented for centralized data management, supporting complex protocols like NFS, CIFS, and iSCSI. This enables efficient handling of virtualization, databases, unified storage tasks, and backup solutions crucial for maintaining unstructured data and redundancy.

NetApp

Sample Customers

John Lewis, HPE IT, Comline AG, AmeriPride Services

Children's Hospital Central California, Plex Systems, PDF PNI Digital Media, Denver Broncos, PDF KSM Legal, Clayton Companies, Virginia Community College

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. NetApp FAS Series

June 2026

Free Report: HPE StoreEasy vs. NetApp FAS Series

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE StoreEasy vs. NetApp FAS Series and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE StoreEasy vs. NetApp FAS Series report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.