Honeycomb Enterprise vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring comparison

Honeycomb.io and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Honeycomb.io is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #40 with an average rating of 7.5. Honeycomb.io holds a 1.3% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Honeycomb.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Honeycomb Enterprise

Read 3 Honeycomb Enterprise reviews

2,750 Views
2,393 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Process M...

Read 6 OpenText Business Process Monitoring reviews

666 Views
653 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Honeycomb Enterprise

OpenText Business Process M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

OpenText Business Process Monitoring and Honeycomb Enterprise are competitive solutions in business process management. Honeycomb Enterprise seems to have an upper hand due to its advanced features and comprehensive capabilities, making it a preferred choice for those willing to invest in robust solutions.

Features: OpenText Business Process Monitoring includes process automation, real-time monitoring, and integration capabilities. Honeycomb Enterprise offers advanced analytics, scalability, and customizable dashboards, providing greater flexibility for complex business environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Business Process Monitoring is known for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer support. Honeycomb Enterprise offers a flexible deployment model with extensive cloud capabilities and premium customer service options, providing a more scalable and supportive deployment experience for enterprise needs.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Business Process Monitoring is often more cost-effective with a lower initial setup cost. Honeycomb Enterprise requires a higher upfront investment due to its broader functionality but delivers significantly improved ROI, making it a valuable long-term investment despite the higher expense.

To learn more, read our detailed Honeycomb Enterprise vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Honeycomb Enterprise vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Honeycomb Enterprise

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

27th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (11th), AI Observability (75th)

OpenText Business Process M...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

40th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Honeycomb Enterprise is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Honeycomb Enterprise	1.3%
OpenText Business Process Monitoring	0.4%
Other	98.3%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Its pattern-matching and code transformation capabilities can be adapted for mass identification and remediation of vulnerable libraries

I asked very specific questions to Mr. Pell about consideration of code security scenarios in pattern design and rules, specifically that tuned with OWASP Top 10. I believe addition of code security focus can be a value-add, though the way Grit architecture is designed and how it works, it is and may not become an alternative choice of code security solutions. Rather, it must be treated as a powerful supplementary tool that augments the existing code security solutions (such as Snyk or Checkmarx) in a DevSecOps or Secure DevOps environment. Anyone interested in learning more on this front or have queries, can get in touch with me for a consulting.

Read full review

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Proactive monitoring boosts system reliability but requires improved protocol support and script customization

Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive request requires a specific skill set, so a template for scripts that work across various protocols should be recommended. The dashboard of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is good enough, but in my operational environment, it is not sufficient. Therefore, I have had to customize everything beyond the package, utilizing Prometheus and Grafana to render more dashboards.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The approach offers significant benefits in terms of efficiency, consistency, and proactive security management, particularly valuable for organizations with large, distributed development teams."

"The solution's most valuable features are the queries for the OpenTelemetry events and all the tracing."

"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team."

"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."

"The stability has been very good over the years."

"The main benefits of using OpenText Business Process Monitoring for my company include anomaly detection and proactive analysis, which enhance our monitoring capabilities."

"The tool team was sort of aware of those tools to deal with. And, that helped us to deliver the project on time."

Cons

"The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team."

"The way Grit architecture is designed and how it works, it is and may not become an alternative choice of code security solutions."

"We can make alerts based on static numbers, which may block us from building alerts that could be generic enough or could be serviced."

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."

"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

"It doesn't have SNMP, the standard communication protocol for sending alerts."

"Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"On a three-year license package, it was a good deal."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

13%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Honeycomb.io?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Honeycomb.io?

Although Grit is a tool code code migration and management of technical debt for large chunks of work, we reviewed Grit from the use case of assisting in faster remediation of vulnerable libraries....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Honeycomb.io?

We set up Honeycomb.io on all the services so that we can have all the set traces of the communication between all the services inside the company. This helps us understand where it could be failin...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

I find OpenText Business Process Monitoring quite expensive, and while it feels expensive, I see it as an affordable investment overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

The idea behind OpenText Business Process Monitoring since the beginning is very good, as it is proactive. We do not wait until the system crashes or misbehaves; we put the application request into...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sentry vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 15% of the time

Grafana vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

More Honeycomb Enterprise Competitors

Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 28% of the time

Knoa EPM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 21% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 19% of the time

Instana Dynamic APM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Download Honeycomb Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

OpenText Business Process Monitoring report

Download OpenText Business Process Monitoring product report

Also Known As

Grit

Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor

Overview

Honeycomb Enterprise is designed to optimize performance visibility, offering a robust platform for distributed system observability. It provides insights for complex data and aids in faster issue resolution, making it a valuable tool for IT professionals.

This tool is tailored for real-time data tracking and improving system performance efficiency. Enterprises benefit from its capacity to handle large-scale data, ensuring seamless operations and continuity. Honeycomb Enterprise helps teams to tackle data challenges head-on by delivering comprehensive analytics that enhance infrastructure reliability and performance metrics.

What Features Make Honeycomb Enterprise Stand Out?

High-Resolution Visibility: Enables detailed system monitoring to identify issues quickly.
Trace Analysis: Offers powerful tracing of distributed systems for in-depth insights.
Data Scalability: Manages extensive data sets effortlessly for better decision-making.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides instant alerts to preempt potential disruptions.
Collaboration Tools: Facilitates teamwork with integrated tools enhancing productivity.

What Benefits and ROI Can Users Expect?

Reduced Downtime: Faster detection and resolution of issues minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resources leading to lower operational costs.
Improved Decision Making: Enhanced data analytics lead to smarter business strategies.
Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined processes improve team efficiency and output quality.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and technology, Honeycomb Enterprise implementations demonstrate its utility in managing complex data flows and optimizing system reliability. Businesses in these sectors leverage its capabilities to maintain high service standards and operational efficiency.

Honeycomb.io

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Clover Health, Eaze, Intercom, Fender

United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service

Buyer's Guide

Honeycomb Enterprise vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring

December 2025

Free Report: Honeycomb Enterprise vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Find out what your peers are saying about Honeycomb Enterprise vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Honeycomb Enterprise vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.