"Migrations are easy using this product."
"It is a cloud-based solution that is easy to deploy, easy to access, and provides users with more features compared to other clouds like AWS and GCP."
"The product has a lot of useful features that are there and ready to use, it's also very easy to use."
"Cosmos DB is stable and easy to use."
"It works reasonably fast. You can retain the original format of the document as received by the third-party system."
"Cosmos is a PaaS, so you don't need to worry about infrastructure and hosting. It has various APIs that allow it to integrate with other solutions. For example, we are using a MongoDB-compatible API for customers, which makes it easier for developers on the team who previously used MongoDB or are accustomed to the old document storage paradigm."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB were the general infrastructure, ease to use, and interface."
"Since it's a managed service, Azure backend handles scalability. From a user's perspective, we don't need to worry about scalability."
"It is a NoSQL database."
"There's a bit of a learning curve at the beginning."
"The solution cannot join two databases like Oracle or SQL Server."
"I would like the speed of transferring data to be improved."
"The query is a little complex. SQL server should have more options. But the query should be better."
"It would be ideal if we could integrate Cosmos DB with our Databricks. At this point, that's not possible."
"The built-in integration of the solution is tight."
"At this stage, we would like more enterprise support. We use MongoDB a lot, and we're trying to get rid of MongoDB. So, I would like to see more features in the Cosmos DB API for MongoDB space."
"I don't think Cosmos DB has improved our organization. People are using it, but I'm not sure it's the best solution. For one, it's costly. Also, there are other issues with it. You cannot get all the records simultaneously. You can only get it in chunks of 1,500 maximum."
"Sometimes, the solution's access request takes time, which should be improved."
Amazon DocumentDB is ranked 5th in Managed NoSQL Databases while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is ranked 1st in Managed NoSQL Databases with 36 reviews. Amazon DocumentDB is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon DocumentDB writes "Pretty scalable with good documentation and has an easy migration process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB writes "Removes bottlenecks related to databases in our application and works quickly because of reference keys". Amazon DocumentDB is most compared with Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon Neptune, Amazon Timestream and Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud, whereas Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is most compared with Amazon Neptune, Amazon DynamoDB, Google Cloud Bigtable, Neo4j AuraDB and Amazon Timestream.
See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.