Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claude for Enterprise vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claude for Enterprise
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
6th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
AI-Powered Chatbots (7th), AI Writing Tools (7th), Large Language Models (LLMs) (6th), AI Proofreading Tools (6th), AI Software Development (19th), AI Content Creation (2nd), AI Research (1st)
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the AI Code Assistants category, the mindshare of Claude for Enterprise is 10.7%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 6.9%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Code Assistants Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot6.9%
Claude for Enterprise10.7%
Other82.4%
AI Code Assistants
 

Featured Reviews

Nishant Thakkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Analyst at WTW
Data visualization and workflow efficiency improve with automated features
I do not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer, and I was not offered a gift card or incentive for this review. We use other tech products such as Microsoft Excel and Slack. We can use my real name when publishing my review, along with my real company name. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Claude an 8.
TusharShankar - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Manager at Synechron
AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages
Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Claude saves me significant time when conducting research or writing quick Python scripts."
"Overall, I rate Claude nine out of ten."
"Claude has positively impacted my organization, as evident from the metrics which show productivity doubling and turnaround time being cut in half."
"GitHub Copilot can improve productivity by up to 40%, especially for experienced developers. Senior developers often spend more time reviewing code, which can make the code review process a bit longer."
"GitHub CoPilot is easy to set up as it only requires enabling certain settings."
"The platform's most valuable feature is its code suggestion capability, which leverages AI to provide context-aware suggestions."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"The platform's most valuable feature is detecting and suggesting variables based on the existing file context."
"GitHub CoPilot is easy to use even for beginners and it supports the integration with CI/CD tools."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"The product is easy to integrate."
 

Cons

"The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way."
"The foundational model would have to be improved to be comparable to ChatGPT for everyday use cases."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"They could simplify the API integrations and allow us to automate certain tasks using our own server without just logging into the web page."
"I don't have enough experience to share this kind of feedback."
"The problem arises when a bot is not well-designed, which frustrates customers."
"The solution's accuracy and relevance could be improved."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"GitHub CoPilot should be integrated with different IDEs beyond VS Code, as it is currently only supported by VS Code."
"They could enhance the product's accuracy of suggestions, especially when dealing with non-standard or legacy code."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."
"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."
"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"It's affordable."
"GitHub Copilot is a paid service, costing approximately $6 per month. There might be a free trial available."
"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."
"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
University
7%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Claude?
For an individual user, it is very easy and straightforward. I cannot speak to larger teams.
What needs improvement with Claude?
The foundational model would have to be improved to be comparable to ChatGPT for everyday use cases. The system should be better at understanding when to reply directly with the foundational model ...
What is your primary use case for Claude?
I primarily use Claude for developing quick Python scripts, conducting research, and getting answers to complex questions. Claude saves me significant time when conducting research or writing quick...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
I am not fully aware of the pricing details as my company manages it, but I recall it was not inexpensive.
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
GitHub CoPilot should be integrated with different IDEs beyond VS Code, as it is currently only supported by VS Code.
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Claude for Enterprise vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.