Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claude for Enterprise vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claude for Enterprise
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AI-Powered Chatbots (9th), AI Writing Tools (7th), Large Language Models (LLMs) (5th), AI Proofreading Tools (4th)
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the AI Code Assistants category, the mindshare of Claude for Enterprise is 10.5%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 6.6%, up from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Code Assistants Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot6.6%
Claude10.5%
Other82.9%
AI Code Assistants
 

Featured Reviews

Nishant Thakkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Data visualization and workflow efficiency improve with automated features
I do not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer, and I was not offered a gift card or incentive for this review. We use other tech products such as Microsoft Excel and Slack. We can use my real name when publishing my review, along with my real company name. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Claude an 8.
TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, I rate Claude nine out of ten."
"Claude has positively impacted my organization, as evident from the metrics which show productivity doubling and turnaround time being cut in half."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"GitHub CoPilot is easy to use even for beginners and it supports the integration with CI/CD tools."
"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."
"It enhances efficiency and productivity in development."
"The CoPilot app that you can use while creating presentations is very useful."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"In terms of understanding user queries and providing code that aligns with my expectations, there is room for improvement."
 

Cons

"The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way."
"Sometimes it requires multiple iterations to get the code I need, like for creating a login page with specific buttons and logic."
"Sometimes, if it is a bigger piece of code, it breaks in between."
"The technology offered by the product in the retail industry and banking processes has certain shortcomings, making them areas that can be improved."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"The only suggestion is to enhance Copilot's ability to assist developers with infrastructure as code tasks. Like, while using CI/CD pipeline, when I use YAML files, so it could just support the port number."
"The limitation is based on the training dataset and the number of repositories."
"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."
"GitHub Copilot is a paid service, costing approximately $6 per month. There might be a free trial available."
"The solution is costly."
"Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."
"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."
"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."
"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.
867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
7%
University
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Claude?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was straightforward without running into major challenges.
What needs improvement with Claude?
I face issues with Claude halting or hallucinating occasionally, as it happens with some projects but not all.
What is your primary use case for Claude?
I use Claude, particularly its artifact features, for data visualization. On a weekly basis, we create newsletters for our clients that require beautiful and good-looking presentations, particularl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
I honestly don't have a clue about how much we usually pay for GitHub CoPilot because the increase in license costs is managed by another team, and I am not the administrator, so I generally don't ...
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
The areas of GitHub CoPilot that need improvement include the ability to debug, which is applicable to AI-driven tools that allow you to code, and to understand our application better and learn fro...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Claude for Enterprise vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.
867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.