Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Q
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
2.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (8th)
 

Featured Reviews

Ayush Harsh - PeerSpot reviewer
This platform significantly boosts productivity with its powerful development context understanding and seamless AWS integration
I particularly appreciate that Amazon Q offers fast and context-aware responses because it understands the development context and provides relevant answers that save time. The AWS integration is excellent, as smooth interaction with AWS services makes it easy to manage cloud tasks directly from the IDE. The code suggestions provide intelligent recommendations and explanations, reducing debugging time and helping me write cleaner code. I appreciate the ability to ask questions in plain English and get technical responses without needing to search through documentation. Amazon Q developer scales efficiently in terms of usage across different project sizes, teams, and workloads, as it works effectively for solo developers and has the potential for larger teams, especially when integrated into shared AWS environments. It supports multiple languages and frameworks, scaling across various stacks, ensuring consistent performance by maintaining responsiveness even in large code bases or complex AWS architectures.
TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Amazon Q saved my time more than other products, such as GitHub Copilot, because it is conscious about particular AWS services."
"The benefits of Amazon Q are that you don't need to build any code base at the backend to develop your RAG system or AI LLM-based summarization systems to do question-answer sets on the documents."
"The explanation and documentation capabilities are excellent."
"The best feature of Amazon Q is that it has knowledge of my entire code base, entire repository, and its flows."
"The best feature of Amazon Q is the voice chat, where it talks back to you in normal language and you can query it."
"GitHub Copilot can improve productivity by up to 40%, especially for experienced developers. Senior developers often spend more time reviewing code, which can make the code review process a bit longer."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"I can upload code snippets or class files and ask for solutions to improve them, which works well. It's a great productivity tool that saves me time searching websites. While there are alternatives like ChatGPT and other AI tools, the advantage of the tool is that it is built into the IDE."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"In terms of understanding user queries and providing code that aligns with my expectations, there is room for improvement."
"The solution's most valuable features are context awareness, multi language support, integration with popular IDs like Visual Studio Code or JetBrains, and reduced coding time."
"It enhances efficiency and productivity in development."
"GitHub Copilot code suggestion capabilities are always good."
 

Cons

"Sometimes feedback is needed immediately. It takes a bit of time because there is a workload."
"While great for standard tasks, it sometimes struggles with more complex or multi-layered problems in large code bases."
"The model is not able to give answers properly with the traffic it is facing, so it needs to be scaled more."
"Even though we connected with the support team of AWS, they were not able to resolve our issue, so we were disappointed at that moment."
"I discovered that the application logs me out automatically after some time, which becomes problematic as I then lose access to my chat history."
"They could improve the product in terms of integration with other tools."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"They could simplify the API integrations and allow us to automate certain tasks using our own server without just logging into the web page."
"The limitation is based on the training dataset and the number of repositories."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
"Sometimes, if it is a bigger piece of code, it breaks in between."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is costly."
"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."
"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."
"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."
"It's affordable."
"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."
"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."
"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.
864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
I honestly don't have a clue about how much we usually pay for GitHub CoPilot because the increase in license costs is managed by another team, and I am not the administrator, so I generally don't ...
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
The areas of GitHub CoPilot that need improvement include the ability to debug, which is applicable to AI-driven tools that allow you to code, and to understand our application better and learn fro...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Q vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.