Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Q
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
2.4
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (8th)
 

Featured Reviews

Jayesh Patil - PeerSpot reviewer
Connectors and guardrails facilitate question-answer setups effectively
There isn't such an issue we have faced with Amazon Q regarding speed increasing. Syncing and indexing takes a lot of time, and they need to improve upon that. Remaining everything is good for us, and that is also acceptable as we can set it as a nightly job. Once it's done, it takes around one hour max for any number of documents. We were trying to address specific issues and challenges by implementing Amazon Q in our environment because currently, they don't provide any APIs directly. We find it difficult to integrate with our product. The second challenge is while connecting Jira, we need the ACLs to maintain our security, but it doesn't allow us to connect to Jira if our ACLs are on. We need to turn them off to connect to it. Even though we connected with the support team of AWS, they were not able to resolve our issue, so we were disappointed at that moment. As a part of improvement, we don't see any improvement areas for Amazon Q at present. We first need to test that we can integrate it with our product. We need the APIs before we can suggest improvements.
TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The benefits of Amazon Q are that you don't need to build any code base at the backend to develop your RAG system or AI LLM-based summarization systems to do question-answer sets on the documents."
"Amazon Q saved my time more than other products, such as GitHub Copilot, because it is conscious about particular AWS services."
"The best feature of Amazon Q is that it has knowledge of my entire code base, entire repository, and its flows."
"The best feature of Amazon Q is the voice chat, where it talks back to you in normal language and you can query it."
"The insight capability is specifically the best one because if searching for data, it will take some amount of time and can be really complex manually; with Amazon Q, it was able to give me quick insights in a couple of seconds with summarized results, which is something really amazing."
"Amazon Q significantly reduced the time we spent on testing; it served as a great tool where we could ask questions, get answers, and complete testing efficiently."
"The best feature Amazon Q offers is the code security scan, which actually depicts the threat assessment of the code or whether a particular code snippet can be utilized by attackers to find loopholes."
"The explanation and documentation capabilities are excellent."
"Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"GitHub CoPilot is easy to use even for beginners and it supports the integration with CI/CD tools."
"The solution's most valuable features are context awareness, multi language support, integration with popular IDs like Visual Studio Code or JetBrains, and reduced coding time."
"The solution increases coding efficiency."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"I use it almost like a search engine, but it goes a step beyond."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
 

Cons

"The model is not able to give answers properly with the traffic it is facing, so it needs to be scaled more."
"Sometimes feedback is needed immediately. It takes a bit of time because there is a workload."
"Even though we connected with the support team of AWS, they were not able to resolve our issue, so we were disappointed at that moment."
"One most important improvement would be having deeper domain-specific intelligence for Amazon Q."
"While great for standard tasks, it sometimes struggles with more complex or multi-layered problems in large code bases."
"I discovered that the application logs me out automatically after some time, which becomes problematic as I then lose access to my chat history."
"The technology offered by the product in the retail industry and banking processes has certain shortcomings, making them areas that can be improved."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"Sometimes, if it is a bigger piece of code, it breaks in between."
"While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"The solution's accuracy and relevance could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."
"GitHub Copilot is a paid service, costing approximately $6 per month. There might be a free trial available."
"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."
"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."
"The solution is costly."
"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Amazon Q?
One most important improvement would be having deeper domain-specific intelligence for Amazon Q. While it can pull enterprise data sources, adding more domain-tuned models, for example in pharma, w...
What is your primary use case for Amazon Q?
My main use case for Amazon Q is primarily focused on business perspectives. I was able to do a Q&A sort of interaction. If I simply asked what the revenue was for this quarter, Amazon Q was ab...
What advice do you have for others considering Amazon Q?
My advice for others looking into using Amazon Q is that we should start small because we have to understand how exactly it works. Take a small use case, such as documentation or a codebase review....
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
I honestly don't have a clue about how much we usually pay for GitHub CoPilot because the increase in license costs is managed by another team, and I am not the administrator, so I generally don't ...
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
The areas of GitHub CoPilot that need improvement include the ability to debug, which is applicable to AI-driven tools that allow you to code, and to understand our application better and learn fro...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Q vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.