Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortra's Automate vs INTELLIBOT comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.7
Fortra's Automate increases efficiency and ROI by significantly reducing labor hours and costs with rapid returns and high task success.
Sentiment score
8.3
INTELLIBOT offers significant cost savings and immediate financial benefits with competitive pricing and reduced personnel expenses, ensuring higher returns.
Fortra's Automate has effectively replaced the workload of an entire employee, saving us significant time and money.
Chief Technology Officer at DOB Systems LLC
It has reduced our expenditures in terms of purchasing more products and employing more technicians.
System Administrator
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the ROI as nine.
Project Manager - DevOps Engineer at ACC
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.5
Fortra's Automate customer service is praised for quick responses, helpful staff, and multiple support channels despite minor language barriers.
Sentiment score
5.9
INTELLIBOT's India service is efficient, but some users face delays and require follow-ups for resolution.
They don't always understand the processes I'm trying to implement.
Senior Data Analyst at a financial services firm with 1-10 employees
They handle customers like me to get to the exact issue, detailing where that issue originates from a technical point of view, the resolution, and the summary they provided.
Software Engineer at Cateina Technologies
I would rate the technical support as a nine out of ten because it is quite fast and courteous.
Account Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The customer service is slow to respond.
Delivery Head at Emergys Mexico
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Fortra's Automate is scalable for all company sizes, supporting various deployments with efficient features but potential cost concerns.
Sentiment score
6.9
INTELLIBOT is scalable, adapting to larger teams, though some users rate its scalability lower than market alternatives.
The scalability of Automate also scores a ten out of ten.
IT Project Manager at Labo des histoires
I can deploy it on multiple infrastructures such as cloud, on-premises, or in a hybrid model.
Software Engineer at Cateina Technologies
It is easy to increase one bot or one studio without needing to buy another orchestrator, which can be quite expensive.
Account Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Fortra's Automate is reliable with minimal issues, though users occasionally face crashes, slowdowns, and connectivity problems.
Sentiment score
7.7
INTELLIBOT is stable and reliable with occasional glitches resolved through frequent updates, receiving a robust 7-8 rating.
The stability of the solution is a ten out of ten.
IT Project Manager at Labo des histoires
For stability on a scale from one to ten, I would give it a solid nine.
Cloud Engineer - ll at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
It has very robust features, and it is not prone to instability.
Account Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The product is good and pretty stable.
Delivery Head at Emergys Mexico
 

Room For Improvement

Fortra's Automate requires improvements in web automation, integration, security, scalability, documentation, pricing, and debugging tools for enhanced efficiency.
INTELLIBOT users recommend less reliance on scripts, improved documentation, and enhancements in Java interaction, OCR, and customer support.
This is a significant concern, especially with critical workloads where visibility into errors is essential.
DevOps Engineer at Teksphere Global Services Limited
My major recommendation would be for easier upgrade paths between major versions.
Project Manager - DevOps Engineer at ACC
When new employees join our company, we created automation so they receive AWS credentials and all their AWS access and cloud access.
Cloud Engineer - ll at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Customer support could also be improved, as they are slow to respond and appear to have policies that do not provide sufficient support for partners.
Delivery Head at Emergys Mexico
 

Setup Cost

Fortra's Automate provides cost-effective, flexible pricing, offering lower costs than competitors and appealing to both enterprises and small businesses.
Enterprise users find INTELLIBOT's pricing mixed, with costs ranging from $1,000 to $5,000, but value remains substantial.
Competitors are often more expensive than Automate.
Account Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
It offered what we wanted at a good, competitive price.
Senior Data Analyst at a financial services firm with 1-10 employees
It does a lot but also costs a lot.
Chief Technology Officer at DOB Systems LLC
 

Valuable Features

Fortra's Automate simplifies automation with drag-and-drop interface, strong integration, and cost-effective solutions for diverse industry needs.
INTELLIBOT provides intuitive automation features, including coding-free AI tasks, document classification, role management, and Citrix integration for efficiency.
Automate's non-reliance on additional orchestrators makes it quite cost-effective.
Account Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
In my opinion, the best feature Automate offers is the scheduling.
DevOps Engineer at Teksphere Global Services Limited
Automate's compatibility with existing IT infrastructure has impacted our business operations positively by providing smooth integration with other software that we use, such as Gmail, Jira, and Microsoft 365 apps, which gives us a unified platform instead of having to keep switching from one software to another, saving a lot of time and streamlining the whole workflows.
IT Project Manager at Labo des histoires
INTELLIBOT provides immediate cost savings on the headcount perspective, as a lot of operational tasks can be automated.
Delivery Head at Emergys Mexico
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's Automate
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (5th)
INTELLIBOT
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
29th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Fortra's Automate is 2.9%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of INTELLIBOT is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Fortra's Automate2.9%
INTELLIBOT0.7%
Other96.4%
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

Jane Rachma Kiniti - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Project Manager at Labo des histoires
Automate has streamlined workflows and increased efficiency with powerful automation
The best features of the solution are the flexible automation features, it is rich with beautiful connectors, and it is easy to use with little to no coding knowledge required to get started, so anybody can use the tool. The intuitive interface of Automate has an intuitive design, which makes it easy to learn and use even without a strong technical background, and it has a drag-and-drop interface, which makes everything so easy and straightforward. The error handling capabilities in complex automation tasks are powerful, as it handles all types of tasks, whether complex or simple. I've never faced any problems even when dealing with complex tasks, so everything is super smooth and highly reliable, even when dealing with big tasks, as it has never slowed down. Automate's compatibility with existing IT infrastructure has impacted our business operations positively by providing smooth integration with other software that we use, such as Gmail, Jira, and Microsoft 365 apps, which gives us a unified platform instead of having to keep switching from one software to another, saving a lot of time and streamlining the whole workflows. The automated analytics have helped improve our business processes since it has increased our efficiency by automating our everyday tasks, freeing up time for us to focus more on strategic activities such as analyzing data and developing new business strategies. It is also cost-saving. By minimizing manual labor, it decreases human errors that can lead to costly mistakes. By automating the tasks, it helps to save costs, and it also improves our accuracy by reducing these errors to ensure that tasks are done almost perfectly.
AK
Delivery Head at Emergys Mexico
Implementation successfully automates operations but support response requires improvement
There are other INTELLIBOT products available in the market that are superior and have been around for a long time. ServiceNow's product could improve by increasing its promotion. Customer support could also be improved, as they are slow to respond and appear to have policies that do not provide sufficient support for partners. They expect partners to be self-sufficient, which seems unusual for a product company.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
6%
Performing Arts
6%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Educational Organization
11%
Government
9%
Performing Arts
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for HelpSystems AutoMate?
I use Fortra's Automate for IT operations as an automated repetitive workflow task, handling tasks like file transfer, job scheduling, SAP data pools, and system notifications.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortra Automate?
I am somewhat aware of Fortra's Automate's pricing, and I can say it is budget-friendly—not too cheap or too high. The pricing is on point.
What needs improvement with Fortra Automate?
Fortra's Automate is good overall, but the advanced logic is somewhat challenging. Some of the more complex branching and error handling require digging into documentation or trial and error before...
Which lesser known RPA vendor has the best chance at unseating today's market leaders?
Intellibot.io would be my suggestion. From DPA to RPA to cognitive model long to Chatbots to IOT they have come a long way since inception. Within the short time they have rose to the top contende...
What needs improvement with INTELLIBOT?
There are other INTELLIBOT products available in the market that are superior and have been around for a long time. ServiceNow ( /products/servicenow-reviews )'s product could improve by increasing...
What is your primary use case for INTELLIBOT?
I work as an implementation partner for ServiceNow ( /products/servicenow-reviews ), using INTELLIBOT ( /products/intellibot-reviews ) primarily for process automation.
 

Also Known As

HelpSystems Automate, Automate
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aldergrove Financial Group, Preferred Health Professionals, Mindbeam Technologies, First Credit Union in British Columbia, Vestcom International, Prime Liberty Benefits, University of Tampa, CNLBancshares, World Precision Instruments, BJ's Restaurants, Globe Pequot Press, Accudata Technologies, Norton Healthcare, Pacific Toxicology Laboratories
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra's Automate vs. INTELLIBOT and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.