Ephesoft Transact vs Tungsten RPA comparison

Ephesoft and Tungsten Automation are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Additionally, 50% of Ephesoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Tungsten Automation users who would recommend it.

Ephesoft Transact

Read 3 Ephesoft Transact reviews

555 Views
433 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Tungsten RPA

Read 27 Tungsten RPA reviews

2,748 Views
1,649 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Ephesoft Transact

Tungsten RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ephesoft Transact and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Ephesoft Transact vs. Tungsten RPA Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Ephesoft Transact vs. Tungsten RPA

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,606 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ephesoft Transact

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (15th)

Tungsten RPA

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (7th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2155206

Software Development Consultant at a hospitality company with 1-10 employees

Average solution with good workflow but needs to improve machine learning

The configuration can be a bit much. The AML engine part could be better. It's not easy to train. It's not so easy to train the system. If it's not trained, the accuracy will be off. They need to improve data quality. They need to start from scratch with the AML. They need to add on the document processing tool. It's getting there; it just need to be expanded. I haven't used the reporting too much. However, it would be helpful to have it more robust. The solution does require a lot of RAM.

Read full review

Mahmoud Alyabroudi

Solutions Architect at DEWA

A n automation solution with OCR and scanner

Tungsten RPA features enhanced desktop automation capabilities, improved Active Directory integration, and upgraded recorder functionality. These updates will be available in the upcoming release. Firstly, The first level of support needs enhancement. When you open a ticket with Tungsten, they inquire about various aspects of the issue. The initial support level should involve conducting a Webex meeting to address and assess the reported issues within the environment directly. This would involve thoroughly checking the issues and logs, among other relevant factors. It may require a minor configuration adjustment that could be resolved promptly during the session. There are several challenges associated with Tungsten RPA. Firstly, there is often a perception issue among employees who may believe that RPA is intended to replace their jobs rather than enhance efficiency. This misconception can hinder the adoption of RPA solutions in the workplace, as employees may resist the implementation of automation technologies. Secondly, there have been challenges related to integrating Tungsten RPA with applications built on Java. Many issues have been addressed and resolved in V11.3, thus improving the compatibility of Tungsten RPA with Java-based applications and major challenges.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the inject feature. With desktop injects, we're doing all these things and extracting these things. Its stable, scalable, and technical support is good."

"I have found the keyword extraction to be helpful."

"Transact's best feature is its ease of customization."

"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."

"The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks."

"Initially, the most effective features for process automation were website automation related to web auditing, SharePoint implementations, and automated management of information."

"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."

"The product saves time and resources."

"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."

"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."

"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."

More Tungsten RPA pros

Cons

"It's not easy to train."

"Their email service and extraction could be better. We get the input via email, and these emails contain different types of documents like Excel, PDF, or they may contain different content in the email body. Due to this variation, sometimes the email service crashes, and emails aren't redirected to Ephesoft Transact. Ephesoft has provided us with new hotfixes. Whatever flaws we found in the 2019.2 version, they have already updated it in the new version, 20.1.05, and it's already released. Drawbacks like not capturing the handwritten fields are now sorted."

"Transact could be improved by removing Java and making its pricing more accessible for smaller customers."

"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."

"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."

"Its documentation is not widely available on the web. They should work on the availability of its documentation. In Automation Anywhere, there is a feature called Discovery Bot that automatically records the process steps and suggests a possible bot. I am not sure if such a feature is available in Kofax. If it is not available, it will be very good to have this feature. "

"The negative side is that UiPath has a really large community on the RPA side, and Tungsten RPA doesn't have any community for the developer side, which is a red flag for us and for customers."

"We've faced a few challenges with Tungsten RPA. One issue I recall was with sending emails that needed multiple attachments. At the time, the feature only allowed attaching one file at a time. We discussed this with Tungsten RPA, and they planned to add multi-attachment capability to their backlog. I'm not sure if it's been upgraded since then. The solution's desktop automation is tricker."

"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."

"Automating systems based on Citrix, where using AI or OCR-based capture of a screen, presents challenges."

"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."

More Tungsten RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Initially, when I got a licensed copy of Ephesoft Transact, it was for one year. After one year, we had to send an email to the Ephesoft team informing them that our license was going to expire. They updated it and provided one license in our file, and we had to update and install the folder. They have versions for one year and lifelong as well."

"Transact's pricing could be better for smaller customers."

"The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."

"Kofax RPA's licensing costs are yearly and expensive."

"There is a standard license needed to use Kofax RPA and the price is reasonable."

"The pricing model for automation solutions like Automation Anywhere, UiPath, and Microsoft Power Platform is subscription-based, where costs are calculated based on factors such as the number of hours used and the scale of automation required.......With Kofax, you purchase a license upfront, and that's all you need. You can create as many automation workflows as you require without additional costs for individual use cases."

"Kofax's prices are pretty reasonable."

"The solution’s license is not expensive."

"Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."

"I give the price of the solution a six out of ten."

More Tungsten RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,606 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Kofax RPA?

You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax RPA?

I am not a user of Tungsten RPA; I sell this product for our company.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kofax RPA?

The negative side is that UiPath has a really large community on the RPA side, and Tungsten RPA doesn't have any community for the developer side, which is a red flag for us and for customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tungsten TotalAgility vs Ephesoft Transact

Compared 23% of the time

ABBYY Vantage vs Ephesoft Transact

Compared 19% of the time

OpenText Capture vs Ephesoft Transact

Compared 15% of the time

Nanonets vs Ephesoft Transact

Compared 12% of the time

HyperScience vs Ephesoft Transact

Compared 11% of the time

More Ephesoft Transact Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 36% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 8% of the time

Tungsten TotalAgility vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 6% of the time

Blue Prism vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 6% of the time

More Tungsten RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)

February 2026

Download Ephesoft Transact product report

Buyer's Guide

Tungsten RPA

January 2026

Download Tungsten RPA product report

Also Known As

No data available

Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow

Overview

Ephesoft provides intelligent document processing solutions with industry-leading technology to help enterprises maximize their productivity. Using AI and patented machine learning technology, Ephesoft’s platform captures data from documents, enriches it with context and amplifies the power of that data, adding intelligence to accelerate any business process and drive successful digital transformation. Once the data is unlocked, Ephesoft classifies it and easily export the data into any ERP, Content Services, RPA, Workflow or other repository.

Customers who have a high volume of valuable documents like invoices, records, contracts, mail, claims or loans, can benefit by accelerating and streamlining processes, eliminating manual data entry and boosting productivity. It’s time to automate your processes and get work done faster.

Ephesoft

Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.

Tungsten Automation

Sample Customers

Honda Logistics, Washington State Health Care Authority

Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita

Buyer's Guide

Ephesoft Transact vs. Tungsten RPA

February 2026

Free Report: Ephesoft Transact vs. Tungsten RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about Ephesoft Transact vs. Tungsten RPA and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,606 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ephesoft Transact vs. Tungsten RPA report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.