Ephesoft Transact vs Tungsten RPA comparison

Ephesoft and Tungsten Automation are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Additionally, 50% of Ephesoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Tungsten Automation users who would recommend it.

Ephesoft Transact

Read 3 Ephesoft Transact reviews

555 Views
433 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Tungsten RPA

Read 27 Tungsten RPA reviews

2,748 Views
1,649 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Ephesoft Transact

Tungsten RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ephesoft Transact and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Ephesoft Transact vs. Tungsten RPA Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ephesoft Transact vs. Tungsten RPA

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,360 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ephesoft Transact

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (15th)

Tungsten RPA

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (7th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2155206

Software Development Consultant at a hospitality company with 1-10 employees

Average solution with good workflow but needs to improve machine learning

The configuration can be a bit much. The AML engine part could be better. It's not easy to train. It's not so easy to train the system. If it's not trained, the accuracy will be off. They need to improve data quality. They need to start from scratch with the AML. They need to add on the document processing tool. It's getting there; it just need to be expanded. I haven't used the reporting too much. However, it would be helpful to have it more robust. The solution does require a lot of RAM.

Read full review

Jamil Milhem

Project Manager-Senior RPA Specialist at DEWA

Automates browsing tasks without needing a server connection

I have worked with Microsoft Power Platform and UiPath. Kofax RPA offers a comprehensive solution with built-in capabilities for executing tasks like running Excel files and web automation without additional servers. They provide their browsers and extensions. For functions such as OCR, image processing, and data extraction, Kofax has built-in features powered by their engine, eliminating the need for subscriptions to external technologies like Microsoft Cognitive Services or Google Search. One of Kofax RPA's strongest features is its on-premise solution, which is particularly beneficial for organizations operating in regions with data regulations, such as the UAE.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Transact's best feature is its ease of customization."

"I have found the keyword extraction to be helpful."

"I like the inject feature. With desktop injects, we're doing all these things and extracting these things. Its stable, scalable, and technical support is good."

"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."

"Initially, the most effective features for process automation were website automation related to web auditing, SharePoint implementations, and automated management of information."

"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."

"If you don't have a computer science background, you can easily use Tungsten RPA because this is a low-code platform and it is easier than other RPA tools."

"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."

"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."

"The pricing of the solution is quite good."

"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."

More Tungsten RPA pros

Cons

"Their email service and extraction could be better. We get the input via email, and these emails contain different types of documents like Excel, PDF, or they may contain different content in the email body. Due to this variation, sometimes the email service crashes, and emails aren't redirected to Ephesoft Transact. Ephesoft has provided us with new hotfixes. Whatever flaws we found in the 2019.2 version, they have already updated it in the new version, 20.1.05, and it's already released. Drawbacks like not capturing the handwritten fields are now sorted."

"It's not easy to train."

"Transact could be improved by removing Java and making its pricing more accessible for smaller customers."

"It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are."

"Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly."

"The product needs more AI capabilities."

"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."

"The scalability has room for improvement."

"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."

"The product has some constraints and performance issues."

"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."

More Tungsten RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Transact's pricing could be better for smaller customers."

"Initially, when I got a licensed copy of Ephesoft Transact, it was for one year. After one year, we had to send an email to the Ephesoft team informing them that our license was going to expire. They updated it and provided one license in our file, and we had to update and install the folder. They have versions for one year and lifelong as well."

"Kofax's prices are pretty reasonable."

"I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."

"Kofax RPA's licensing costs are yearly and expensive."

"There is a standard license needed to use Kofax RPA and the price is reasonable."

"Kofax RPA is moderately priced but expensive in comparison to UiPath and Power Automate."

"The pricing model for automation solutions like Automation Anywhere, UiPath, and Microsoft Power Platform is subscription-based, where costs are calculated based on factors such as the number of hours used and the scale of automation required.......With Kofax, you purchase a license upfront, and that's all you need. You can create as many automation workflows as you require without additional costs for individual use cases."

"Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."

"Price is not a problem, because they are a competitor and we have a special rate."

More Tungsten RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

12%

Insurance Company

10%

Performing Arts

10%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Performing Arts

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Kofax RPA?

You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax RPA?

The pricing models across the market initially differed significantly, as most RPA implementations were licensed on a per bot basis, unlike Tungsten RPA, which uses a server-based model. Though the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kofax RPA?

Automation of complex processes involving stable legacy systems could be a major plus. The biggest issue lies in the stability of the target environment. Automating systems based on Citrix, where u...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tungsten TotalAgility vs Ephesoft Transact

Compared 29% of the time

ABBYY Vantage vs Ephesoft Transact

Compared 24% of the time

OpenText Capture vs Ephesoft Transact

Compared 18% of the time

HyperScience vs Ephesoft Transact

Compared 14% of the time

UiPath IXP vs Ephesoft Transact

Compared 14% of the time

More Ephesoft Transact Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 38% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 8% of the time

Tungsten TotalAgility vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 7% of the time

Fortra's Automate vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 5% of the time

More Tungsten RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)

January 2026

Download Ephesoft Transact product report

Buyer's Guide

Tungsten RPA

January 2026

Download Tungsten RPA product report

Also Known As

No data available

Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow

Overview

Ephesoft provides intelligent document processing solutions with industry-leading technology to help enterprises maximize their productivity. Using AI and patented machine learning technology, Ephesoft’s platform captures data from documents, enriches it with context and amplifies the power of that data, adding intelligence to accelerate any business process and drive successful digital transformation. Once the data is unlocked, Ephesoft classifies it and easily export the data into any ERP, Content Services, RPA, Workflow or other repository.

Customers who have a high volume of valuable documents like invoices, records, contracts, mail, claims or loans, can benefit by accelerating and streamlining processes, eliminating manual data entry and boosting productivity. It’s time to automate your processes and get work done faster.

Ephesoft

Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.

Tungsten Automation

Sample Customers

Honda Logistics, Washington State Health Care Authority

Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita

Buyer's Guide

Ephesoft Transact vs. Tungsten RPA

December 2025

Free Report: Ephesoft Transact vs. Tungsten RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about Ephesoft Transact vs. Tungsten RPA and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ephesoft Transact vs. Tungsten RPA report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.