DX Performance Management vs Observer GigaStor comparison

Broadcom and Viavi Solutions are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #57 with an average rating of 8.5, while Viavi Solutions is ranked #95. Broadcom holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Viavi Solutions’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Viavi Solutions users who would recommend it.

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

432 Views
132 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Observer GigaStor

Read 7 Observer GigaStor reviews

241 Views
108 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

Observer GigaStor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Performance Management and Observer GigaStor are competing in the network monitoring category. Observer GigaStor holds an edge due to its robust features, making it appealing despite its higher costs.

Features: DX Performance Management provides real-time visibility and predictive analytics, which aid in troubleshooting and performance monitoring. It is designed for cost-efficiency with features like quick setup and basic data analysis. Observer GigaStor offers comprehensive data capture, detailed forensic analysis, and advanced network traffic insights, making it suitable for complex network environments.

Room for Improvement: DX Performance Management could enhance its deployment model to accommodate more complex networks and improve its data capture capabilities. Observer GigaStor might reduce its cost structure to appeal to more budget-conscious buyers and simplify its setup process. Both could benefit from advanced automation features to reduce manual intervention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Observer GigaStor provides sophisticated deployment with extensive customer support, ideal for handling complex installations. DX Performance Management is simpler to deploy and benefits from efficient customer support, though it may require more user intervention during setup.

Pricing and ROI: DX Performance Management is known for lower setup costs and quicker ROI, which is attractive to cost-sensitive buyers. Observer GigaStor, despite higher initial costs, justifies these with advanced capabilities providing a long-term ROI through superior insights, making it valuable for those with complex needs.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. Observer GigaStor Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. Observer GigaStor

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

57th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (2nd), DX NetOps (2nd)

Observer GigaStor

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

95th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Troubleshooting (14th), Network Packet Broker (NPB) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Observer GigaStor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sandip Kheni

Lead Developer at STL - Sterlite Technologies Limited

The vertical database loads faster than any other product available

We experience disconnections between the solutions own components. In the last five years, there have been many intermittent connection issues with the four components and we still don't know the reasons. The solution has issues when loading groups that have been created in the application interfaces. It would be nice to have a mobile application. In the current industry and technical word, the mobile phone is the only thing that is always in your hands. Other Broadcom products have mobile applications but the solution doesn't offer one. It would be great to view device parameters and view or download graphs from a mobile device.

Read full review

Jeroen-Dubbelman

Director at Bitrate

Aids significantly in the threat-hunting process and provides a score-based evaluation of user experience

There are many valuable features, but understanding end-user response times stands out. It provides a score-based evaluation of user experience, helping customers quickly pinpoint whether issues originate from the network, server, client, or application. Additionally, it facilitates in-depth analysis of application dependencies. The retrospective network analysis capability of Observer GigaStor has been beneficial. It's a pivotal feature for network performance solutions. However, I prefer to consider the entire solution suite - GigaStor, along with GigaFlow and Apex - for comprehensive network visibility and monitoring. So, I prefer to integrate all three solutions to provide the best visibility. They complement each other well, with Apex aggregating and correlating data from both GigaStor and GigaFlow to enhance environmental understanding and troubleshooting efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Great dashboards and good integration with other solutions."

"One of the most valuable features is the ease of use."

"The integration with NetFlow, the NFA solution, so that we can have our flow forensics paired with the SNMP polling performance metrics on the same page."

"One feature I like about CA Performance Management is the certification of the devices."

"When we deployed it, right out of the box we were able to stand up Performance Management within two weeks, in our production environment, with full discovery and relevant information, actual information, that we could use in our command center, our 24/7 operations center."

"It is very easy to add devices; just be aware that it requires SNMP to be enabled."

"The feature that is inherent to its core, of being able to graphically represent a trend and status, is nice."

"The most valuable feature of DX Performance Management is the quick way we can collect data without putting much effort. They have a lot of customization and features with the solution internally and out of the box. We can discover the device, and start collecting information. For example, if the device is available, we can receive the CPU and memory utilization, and the interface optimization is simple and very fast to implement."

More DX Performance Management pros

"It's able to capture packets and, after a long time, you can come and use that information; to check, to analyze - everything you would want to do. So it's very good and helpful if you want to protect your data. It is stored in a certain place where you can access it every time you want to analyze it."

"I also have the ability to see an application's performance, to see what's going on, why a network is slow, why this program for this user is experiencing a delay or some network issue"

"The ability to capture packets. It is not only for monitoring. That is very important for a company that wants to keep an eye on the packets, the transactions, the flows..."

"This solution allows us to see exactly what is going on in the network and we can very quickly solve issues with users."

"It can help to write your rules, organize firewalls, your block, and also your protocols and IP address to come in or out of your network."

"There are many valuable features, but understanding end-user response times stands out. It provides a score-based evaluation of user experience, helping customers quickly pinpoint whether issues originate from the network, server, client, or application. Additionally, it facilitates in-depth analysis of application dependencies."

Cons

"Install is done as root, which is a security no-no, and the database IO requirements were not stated correctly, which lead to a year of instability."

"CA PM can be complex to build and configure. Creating the folders / groups / sites required establishing many rule sets."

"This tool gathers so much data, which makes it hard to convert over. To upgrade it, you really need the solution backed up. That is the issue that we are facing right now."

"We experience disconnections between the solutions own components."

"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center. We are kind of being driven to buy UIM, and I can't justify it."

"Some of the individual report views, the way some of the columns sort, there's room for improvement in giving us more flexibility in being able to sort reports based, for example, on what columns the metrics fall under."

"We would like to be capable of reporting network performance with a report strictly focused on the times outside business hours, which CA PM does not currently support. We have discontinued the use of the Business Hours Filtering until CA engineers are able to resolve or offer guidance."

"The quantity of views which are tied to specific metric families is too high. Also, the problem is the view doesn't tell you which metric family it uses, so you don't know why you don't see data."

More DX Performance Management cons

"GigaStor feeds into Apex. So, the area where there could be improvement would be in artificial intelligence. For example, the incorporation of more advanced machine learning or AI capabilities could enhance its functionality."

"Maybe the graphical user interface could be simplified to allow people to use it more easily. It's already good, but they can work more on it to make it even easier."

"Graphics need improvement. Because a lot of the information there you have to input first in some case to have full potential. It could be more automated."

"I would like to have more than 4TB of storage available in the portable version of this solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

"It's quite expensive."

"It depends on the requirements you have. There are three types of license. There's the updates license, the work group license, and the workstation license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX Performance Management?

The tool helps us understand network performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Performance Management?

The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

See all answers

What do you like most about Observer GigaStor?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Observer GigaStor?

I would rate the pricing a ten out of ten. It's quite expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Observer GigaStor?

GigaStor feeds into Apex. So, the area where there could be improvement would be in artificial intelligence. For example, the incorporation of more advanced machine learning or AI capabilities coul...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management

Compared 35% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management

Compared 35% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management

Compared 29% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 29% of the time

Wireshark vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Data Broker vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 20% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 16% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 15% of the time

More Observer GigaStor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

June 2025

Download DX Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Observer GigaStor

June 2025

Download Observer GigaStor product report

Also Known As

CA Performance Management

No data available

Overview

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

Observer GigaStor is a network analysis tool that comes in a variety of form factors, including rack mount, portable, and virtual. Capable of storing up to a petabyte of traffic for later analysis, GigaStor helps ensure optimal network and application performance.

Viavi Solutions

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

Cisco Systems, Hawaiian Telecom, Renown Health, State of Nevada, U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, Allstate Insurance, Jack Henry & Associates, United States Airforce, US Bank, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Chicago Board Options Exchange

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. Observer GigaStor

June 2025

Free Report: DX Performance Management vs. Observer GigaStor

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. Observer GigaStor and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Performance Management vs. Observer GigaStor report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.