Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DX Performance Management vs Observer GigaStor comparison

Broadcom and Viavi Solutions are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #59 with an average rating of 8.5, while Viavi Solutions is ranked #96. Broadcom holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Viavi Solutions’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Viavi Solutions users who would recommend it.
DX Performance Management
Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews
  • 728 Views
  • 437 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Observer GigaStor
Read 7 Observer GigaStor reviews
  • 575 Views
  • 276 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Performance Management and Observer GigaStor are competing in the network monitoring category. Observer GigaStor holds an edge due to its robust features, making it appealing despite its higher costs.

Features: DX Performance Management provides real-time visibility and predictive analytics, which aid in troubleshooting and performance monitoring. It is designed for cost-efficiency with features like quick setup and basic data analysis. Observer GigaStor offers comprehensive data capture, detailed forensic analysis, and advanced network traffic insights, making it suitable for complex network environments.

Room for Improvement: DX Performance Management could enhance its deployment model to accommodate more complex networks and improve its data capture capabilities. Observer GigaStor might reduce its cost structure to appeal to more budget-conscious buyers and simplify its setup process. Both could benefit from advanced automation features to reduce manual intervention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Observer GigaStor provides sophisticated deployment with extensive customer support, ideal for handling complex installations. DX Performance Management is simpler to deploy and benefits from efficient customer support, though it may require more user intervention during setup.

Pricing and ROI: DX Performance Management is known for lower setup costs and quicker ROI, which is attractive to cost-sensitive buyers. Observer GigaStor, despite higher initial costs, justifies these with advanced capabilities providing a long-term ROI through superior insights, making it valuable for those with complex needs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. Observer GigaStor Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
DX Performance Management vs. Observer GigaStor
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
59th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure Capacity Planning (2nd), DX NetOps (2nd)
Observer GigaStor
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
96th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Network Troubleshooting (14th), Network Packet Broker (NPB) (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Observer GigaStor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Sandip Kheni - PeerSpot reviewer
The vertical database loads faster than any other product available
We experience disconnections between the solutions own components. In the last five years, there have been many intermittent connection issues with the four components and we still don't know the reasons. The solution has issues when loading groups that have been created in the application interfaces. It would be nice to have a mobile application. In the current industry and technical word, the mobile phone is the only thing that is always in your hands. Other Broadcom products have mobile applications but the solution doesn't offer one. It would be great to view device parameters and view or download graphs from a mobile device.
Read full review
Jeroen-Dubbelman - PeerSpot reviewer
Aids significantly in the threat-hunting process and provides a score-based evaluation of user experience
There are many valuable features, but understanding end-user response times stands out. It provides a score-based evaluation of user experience, helping customers quickly pinpoint whether issues originate from the network, server, client, or application. Additionally, it facilitates in-depth analysis of application dependencies. The retrospective network analysis capability of Observer GigaStor has been beneficial. It's a pivotal feature for network performance solutions. However, I prefer to consider the entire solution suite - GigaStor, along with GigaFlow and Apex - for comprehensive network visibility and monitoring. So, I prefer to integrate all three solutions to provide the best visibility. They complement each other well, with Apex aggregating and correlating data from both GigaStor and GigaFlow to enhance environmental understanding and troubleshooting efficiency.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The integration with NetFlow, the NFA solution, so that we can have our flow forensics paired with the SNMP polling performance metrics on the same page."
"There is another component of the tool called Network Flow Analysis. It gives us the ability to troubleshoot issues which do not appear right away."
"Scalability is the reason we bought the product to begin with. It was designed from the ground up for carrier-grade services, and we are in effect a MSP ourselves. So we were really interested in looking at something to be able to handle the multi-tenancy and scale as large as possible. This was the only solution that we really considered at that level."
"You can have thousands of devices inside and hundreds of thousands of interphases without a problem."
"One feature I like about CA Performance Management is the certification of the devices."
"The feature that is inherent to its core, of being able to graphically represent a trend and status, is nice."
"My sales representative, I would not trade him in for the world. He has done a really good job. I am really happy with him.​"
"It can be easily integrated with other systems and is powerful enough to collect data from a large number of devices."
More DX Performance Management pros
"I also have the ability to see an application's performance, to see what's going on, why a network is slow, why this program for this user is experiencing a delay or some network issue"
"It's able to capture packets and, after a long time, you can come and use that information; to check, to analyze - everything you would want to do. So it's very good and helpful if you want to protect your data. It is stored in a certain place where you can access it every time you want to analyze it."
"There are many valuable features, but understanding end-user response times stands out. It provides a score-based evaluation of user experience, helping customers quickly pinpoint whether issues originate from the network, server, client, or application. Additionally, it facilitates in-depth analysis of application dependencies."
"This solution allows us to see exactly what is going on in the network and we can very quickly solve issues with users."
"The ability to capture packets. It is not only for monitoring. That is very important for a company that wants to keep an eye on the packets, the transactions, the flows..."
"It can help to write your rules, organize firewalls, your block, and also your protocols and IP address to come in or out of your network."
 

Cons

"Since we are out of registered IP space, we are moving to ipv6 and we expect our vendors to move with us, and they have not delivered yet."
"Even though we can see when something is not available, it would also be it would be nice if some sort of alerting took place to that you could know immediately if something went down."
"The quantity of views which are tied to specific metric families is too high. Also, the problem is the view doesn't tell you which metric family it uses, so you don't know why you don't see data."
"When it goes through discovery, or whatever it is doing in the back-end that slows it down, sometimes we get some failures with it. ​"
"This solution is not very scalable."
"I think it would be helpful having a more comprehensive set of certifications so that I could natively deploy devices to my environment and the tool would immediately recognize and immediately be able to provide relevant performance information without a lot of tuning on my part."
"The solution could improve the database model. It is also not very good because they have a lot of interconnections with other data sources, such as NFA and VNA."
"It could be a little easier to integrate new metrics."
More DX Performance Management cons
"Graphics need improvement. Because a lot of the information there you have to input first in some case to have full potential. It could be more automated."
"GigaStor feeds into Apex. So, the area where there could be improvement would be in artificial intelligence. For example, the incorporation of more advanced machine learning or AI capabilities could enhance its functionality."
"I would like to have more than 4TB of storage available in the portable version of this solution."
"Maybe the graphical user interface could be simplified to allow people to use it more easily. It's already good, but they can work more on it to make it even easier."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."
"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."
"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."
"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. ​"
"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."
"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."
"It's quite expensive."
"It depends on the requirements you have. There are three types of license. There's the updates license, the work group license, and the workstation license."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX Performance Management?
The tool helps us understand network performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Performance Management?
The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.
See all answers
What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?
Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.
See all answers
What do you like most about Observer GigaStor?
There are many valuable features, but understanding end-user response times stands out. It provides a score-based evaluation of user experience, helping customers quickly pinpoint whether issues or...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Observer GigaStor?
I would rate the pricing a ten out of ten. It's quite expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Observer GigaStor?
GigaStor feeds into Apex. So, the area where there could be improvement would be in artificial intelligence. For example, the incorporation of more advanced machine learning or AI capabilities coul...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management
Compared 31% of the time
SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management Logo
SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management
Compared 25% of the time
DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management Logo
DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management
Compared 24% of the time
OmniPeek vs DX Performance Management Logo
OmniPeek vs DX Performance Management
Compared 20% of the time
More DX Performance Management Competitors
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Observer GigaStor Logo
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Observer GigaStor
Compared 28% of the time
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Data Broker vs Observer GigaStor Logo
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Data Broker vs Observer GigaStor
Compared 19% of the time
Wireshark vs Observer GigaStor Logo
Wireshark vs Observer GigaStor
Compared 18% of the time
AppNeta by Broadcom vs Observer GigaStor Logo
AppNeta by Broadcom vs Observer GigaStor
Compared 18% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Observer GigaStor Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Observer GigaStor
Compared 16% of the time
More Observer GigaStor Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
DX Performance Management
August 2025
DX Performance Management reportDownload DX Performance Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Observer GigaStor
August 2025
Observer GigaStor reportDownload Observer GigaStor product report
 

Also Known As

CA Performance Management
No data available
 

Overview

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

Observer GigaStor is a network analysis tool that comes in a variety of form factors, including rack mount, portable, and virtual. Capable of storing up to a petabyte of traffic for later analysis, GigaStor helps ensure optimal network and application performance.

Viavi Solutions
 

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG 
Cisco Systems, Hawaiian Telecom, Renown Health, State of Nevada, U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, Allstate Insurance, Jack Henry & Associates, United States Airforce, US Bank, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Chicago Board Options Exchange
Buyer's Guide
DX Performance Management vs. Observer GigaStor
July 2025
Free Report: DX Performance Management vs. Observer GigaStor
Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. Observer GigaStor and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our DX Performance Management vs. Observer GigaStor report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.