DX Performance Management vs ManageEngine IT360 comparison

Broadcom and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #57 with an average rating of 8.5, while ManageEngine is ranked #108. Broadcom holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

716 Views
430 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ManageEngine IT360

Read 5 ManageEngine IT360 reviews

426 Views
175 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

ManageEngine IT360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine IT360 and DX Performance Management compete in IT management. ManageEngine IT360 excels in pricing and support while DX Performance Management stands out with advanced features justifying its cost.

Features: ManageEngine IT360 offers integrated network, server, and application monitoring, making it suitable for businesses seeking an all-in-one solution. It also provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities ideal for mid-sized enterprises. DX Performance Management offers detailed performance metrics, predictive analytics, and scalable solutions, making it beneficial for large-scale environments requiring in-depth insights.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine IT360 could enhance its advanced analytics capabilities, improve its scalability, and integrate more predictive analytics. DX Performance Management could simplify its deployment process, reduce initial setup complexity, and lower its service customization requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine IT360 provides easy deployment with extensive documentation and reliable customer support, suitable for mid-sized enterprises. DX Performance Management offers substantial customer service and a comprehensive onboarding process but faces complex deployment challenges, catering to larger organizations needing customization.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine IT360 offers lower setup costs and quicker ROI due to its integrated approach. DX Performance Management requires a higher initial investment but provides significant ROI through its enhanced features and analytics. ManageEngine focuses on value-driven pricing whereas DX adopts a feature-driven investment strategy.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. ManageEngine IT360 Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. ManageEngine IT360

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,499 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

57th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (2nd), DX NetOps (2nd)

ManageEngine IT360

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

108th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (39th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (77th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine IT360 is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sandip Kheni

Lead Developer at STL - Sterlite Technologies Limited

The vertical database loads faster than any other product available

We experience disconnections between the solutions own components. In the last five years, there have been many intermittent connection issues with the four components and we still don't know the reasons. The solution has issues when loading groups that have been created in the application interfaces. It would be nice to have a mobile application. In the current industry and technical word, the mobile phone is the only thing that is always in your hands. Other Broadcom products have mobile applications but the solution doesn't offer one. It would be great to view device parameters and view or download graphs from a mobile device.

Read full review

Ziyad Moghalis

It manager at PTC (Public Telecomuncation Corporation)

Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy

This solution is good for configuration management. The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training. ManageEngine is easy to deploy. It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network. The alerting capability is good and it will send out emails.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration with NetFlow, the NFA solution, so that we can have our flow forensics paired with the SNMP polling performance metrics on the same page."

"You can create intelligent alerts so you have enough time to replace the router or interface before it's full. The same is applicable for CBQoS channels."

"Great dashboards and good integration with other solutions."

"The ability to quickly do drag and drop customized reports for dashboards."

"Customer service is top-notch."

"Downloads and records are the most valuable features."

"There is a good amount of vendor certification which comes with the product. That's all factory-loaded, no need to load any custom-made files. Most of the metrics are calibrated and captured from the devices based on the defaults available from vendor certification."

"Spectrum is very good at monitoring all network faults and configurations."

More DX Performance Management pros

"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."

"The technical support is good."

"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."

Cons

"Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected."

"Install is done as root, which is a security no-no, and the database IO requirements were not stated correctly, which lead to a year of instability."

"We would like to be capable of reporting network performance with a report strictly focused on the times outside business hours, which CA PM does not currently support. We have discontinued the use of the Business Hours Filtering until CA engineers are able to resolve or offer guidance."

"CA PM can be complex to build and configure. Creating the folders / groups / sites required establishing many rule sets."

"I'm not a fan of many extra features since they usually burden the software and reduce its reliability."

"I think it would be helpful having a more comprehensive set of certifications so that I could natively deploy devices to my environment and the tool would immediately recognize and immediately be able to provide relevant performance information without a lot of tuning on my part."

"DX Performance Management should increase high availability. If one of my two data centers goes offline and the other is operational, I need a seamless transition from the primary to the secondary data center. It's crucial to maintain consistent monitoring of the devices during this transition. Therefore, I require continuous, 24/7 monitoring of my system using this tool."

"This may be available by now but for server space, when it comes to the disk file system, I'd like to see that graphically represented, or the trend, rather than what I'm seeing now."

More DX Performance Management cons

"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."

"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."

"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX Performance Management?

The tool helps us understand network performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Performance Management?

The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management

Compared 31% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management

Compared 25% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

OmniPeek vs DX Performance Management

Compared 20% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 100% of the time

More ManageEngine IT360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

July 2025

Download DX Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

July 2025

Download ManageEngine IT360 product report

Also Known As

CA Performance Management

IT360

Overview

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

With IT360 you will deliver services efficiently with maximum scalability. Service providers can now accurately manage the SLAs and release new services faster with features like Multi-tenancy, High Availability, Enterprise level systems and Datacenter monitoring, Remote site monitoring and Customer and site-specific dashboards.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

Khimji Ramdas, RME Global, Bank of Namibia, DORMA, PMSI, National Commodities Exchange, EMA, Redstone, First Source

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. ManageEngine IT360

July 2025

Free Report: DX Performance Management vs. ManageEngine IT360

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. ManageEngine IT360 and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Performance Management vs. ManageEngine IT360 report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.