DocuSign CLM vs Oracle Content Management comparison

The compared Docusign and Oracle solutions aren't in the same category. Docusign is ranked #1 in CMS , and holds a 8.2% mindshare in the category. Oracle is ranked #12 in ECM , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Docusign users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

DocuSign CLM

Read 1 DocuSign CLM review

823 Views
617 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Content Management

Read 4 Oracle Content Management reviews

1,220 Views
952 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DocuSign CLM

Oracle Content Management

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DocuSign CLM

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Contract Management Software (1st)

Oracle Content Management

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (12th), Document Management Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

DocuSign CLM and Oracle Content Management aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. DocuSign CLM is designed for Contract Management Software and holds a mindshare of 8.2%, down 9.4% compared to last year.
Oracle Content Management, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Content Management, holds 2.5% mindshare, up 2.5% since last year.

Contract Management Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
DocuSign CLM	8.2%
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)	7.0%
Icertis Contract Management	6.6%
Other	78.2%

Contract Management Software

Enterprise Content Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Content Management	2.5%
SharePoint	11.3%
OpenText Content Management	8.0%
Other	78.2%

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Jeanette Wayne

Senior Director, Chief of Staff & Program Management Office (PMO) at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees

Our contracts are moving from draft to full authorization significantly faster now

* The redline function isn’t sufficiently robust. Our clients struggle with the tool during negotiation. * The search feature needs to be a bit more robust, to facilitate complex search functions. * Integration with our ERP system (and other systems) needs to be enabled. SpringCM reports that they are working on all of these items and that they are integrated into their roadmap.

Read full review

SanjeevKumar24

Principal Data Scientist at Tata Consultancy

Built-in integrations increase efficiency but cluster support requires improvement

On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments. Multiple instances need to be set up and configured. In the cloud environment, improvements are ongoing. The fallback and benefit assessment of the product suggest a need for a rating of seven or eight.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Contract Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Oracle Content Management?

It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Content Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Content Management?

I use Oracle Content Management for multiple projects, applications, and vendors.

See all answers

Comparisons

Icertis Contract Management vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 12% of the time

SirionLabs vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 12% of the time

Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite Procurement Contracts vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 9% of the time

Ironclad vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 8% of the time

More DocuSign CLM Competitors

SharePoint vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 18% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 18% of the time

Alfresco vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle WebCenter vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 8% of the time

Hyland Perceptive Content vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Content Management Competitors

Product Reports

No data available

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

February 2026

Download Oracle Content Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Oracle Document and Process Cloud, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud

Overview

SpringCM's platform manages contracts, documents and all types of content. SpringCM includes powerful workflow, mobile and security features that eliminate time-consuming manual steps in critical business processes.

Docusign

Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is a cloud-based content hub to drive omni-channel content management and accelerate experience delivery.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Valvoline, Uber, Spotify, Popsugar, Facebook, NCR, USDA, US Department of Energy, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

TekStream Solutions LLC, NetCompany, AFG, Pride Mobility, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd., Sutton Tools, Mythics, Inc., DVLA

We monitor all Contract Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.