Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Qualibrate comparison

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Read 5 Qualibrate reviews

1,539 Views
1,016 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Digital.ai Continuous Testing and Qualibrate are competing products in software testing processes. Digital.ai Continuous Testing is advantageous in pricing and support, while Qualibrate is preferred for its comprehensive features.

Features: Digital.ai Continuous Testing offers robust automation capabilities, extensive test coverage, and CI/CD integration for continuous feedback. Qualibrate provides scriptless test automation, robust documentation features, and simplicity that appeals to teams seeking reduced complexity and better collaboration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital.ai Continuous Testing supports a flexible deployment model with strong integration, ensuring easy adaptation into existing workflows. Qualibrate simplifies the setup process with its straightforward cloud-based deployment. Digital.ai offers more comprehensive customer support with established support channels and responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Digital.ai Continuous Testing has a competitive initial setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious organizations with straightforward ROI due to reduced testing times and increased reliability. Qualibrate requires a higher initial investment but offers long-term cost savings through efficient process automation and reduced maintenance overhead, presenting a strong ROI case over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Qualibrate Report (Updated: June 2026).

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Qualibrate

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (3rd)

Qualibrate

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

28th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (34th), Regression Testing Tools (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Continuous Testing is 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualibrate is 1.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Digital.ai Continuous Testing	1.3%
Qualibrate	1.4%
Other	97.3%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mampi Bhattacharya

Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Continuous testing has accelerated daily releases and now provides faster, richer debugging insights

Digital.ai Continuous Testing could be better in certain areas, and I can share my experience-based view on what can be frustrating. One issue is device availability and queue delays during peak CI hours. Sometimes devices are busy, causing tests to queue and the pipeline to slow down unexpectedly, which is especially painful for large regression suites or tight release timelines. Improvements are needed in smarter auto-scaling of device pools and better priority-based scheduling. Additionally, execution speed variability occurs; the same test sometimes runs fast and sometimes slow, depending on device load and network latency, making results less predictable. More stable execution environments and better performance isolation per session would help. Furthermore, debugging can still be indirect; even with logs or videos, I do not fully control the device as I would with local debugging, making it hard to pause and inspect live states or reproduce edge-case issues locally. More interactive debugging and improved local reproduction tools are necessary. Cost versus usage efficiency is another area of concern, as device cloud usage can be expensive and we sometimes have idle or inefficient tests that waste money. Improvements in usage analytics and cost optimization suggestions for smart test selection to run only impacted tests are areas where I believe Digital.ai Continuous Testing could improve.

Read full review

it_user1760325

Test Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Reduces our testing time significantly, enabling us to release more frequently

The most valuable feature is the way it works, the usability. From the first setup, the user interface is the most beautiful. It's very nice the way you can recover things and make it work. We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate. Because everything we do is in SAP Solution Manager, we are now able to do test automatization, combined with Qualibrate. All the defects are available in SAP Solution Manager and all the changes will be in Qualibrate, immediately. From Qualibrate, we see whether tests are good or not. We can create a test-related incident in Solution Manager for those that are not good, and Test Suite in Solution Manager will notify the person who has to rebuild it. That works very nicely.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing has positively impacted my organization with massive reductions in testing time, enabling us to cut our regression cycle from two to three days down to two to three hours, transition from weekly releases to nearly daily deployments, and reduce production defects by 30 to 50% while significantly improving debugging efficiency and overall team productivity."

"The most useful feature for me is Mobile Studio. It has a UI where I can click on elements, and it generates a script for me. Mobile Studio can generate code from testing steps. I'm using Python with it."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing has had a very positive impact in terms of efficiency and quality."

"I have seen a clear positive ROI after implementing Digital.ai Continuous Testing, especially in terms of time saving, faster release cycle, and improved efficiency."

"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing, and they also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing has had a pretty positive impact on the organization, especially in terms of speed and reliability."

"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

"We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate."

"The widget's ease of use is the most valuable, which means it allows you or business people to record the automated test scripts. In most cases, it is really good because it is the business people who actually know how the system is being used. The simplicity of the design is valuable, where you can record your transactions, then create your automated scripts. You can automate it at the same time, and the automation features are cool."

"We do see the long-term value in terms of time savings and the stress it is going to alleviate for the team."

"With Qualibrate, when we looked at the time and resources we are saving it was €1.5 million per year, mostly because of the move away from manual testing."

"What Qualibrate makes very easy to do is to record a process flow. Within five minutes you have a clear document produced by Qualibrate. Instead of using Word, and copying and pasting pictures into it from printscreens, within five minutes what you have was easy to make and it's easy for users to use."

"Before Qualibrate, we did a release in about three months, and the regression testing would take us about three weeks with 15 people; now, we do it in one night."

"It is the principle functionality that we're leveraging, which really can be defined as recordings and playbacks. So, you record the scripts that you want to execute and you also want to be able to playback. So, these are the features that we are largely leveraging. There are flows and scenarios, and they are the design aspects that fit within the playback and the recording solution. For me, they are the core of Qualibrate, and that's what we're using."

"The most valuable feature is that it's user-friendly."

More Qualibrate pros

Cons

"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."

"The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version."

"Device availability and queue delays during peak CI hours are an issue; sometimes devices are busy, causing tests to queue and the pipeline to slow down unexpectedly, which is especially painful for large regression suites or tight release timelines."

"One challenge is that the initial setup and integration with CI/CD pipelines can sometimes be a bit complex, especially for teams new to automation."

"I believe that it could be more stable. During times when something is not working, it is difficult to find the solution."

"The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing is a strong platform, but there are a few areas where it could be improved to make the experience even better."

"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing cons

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate."

"Their support has been quite good overall, but there have been some frustrations recently where we just feel like we're not always being heard."

"What I would really like to see is if you are running scripts in Qualibrate, and there is a defect, then you can have it automatically raise a defect in your own ticketing system."

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate. There is a development tool called xpath and you have to program it. We always thought it wouldn't be necessary to program it with Qualibrate, that everything could be solved by Qualibrate without programming, but you have to program some things. Using xpath is more complicated, and not easy for everybody. It would be helpful if there were a no-code solution for this."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine. It does have reporting, i.e., a dashboard, but it is preconfigured, predefined KPIs and datasets. That could be improved because the datasets don't have descriptions, so you really need to know what you're doing. Whereas, it would be great if it could have more descriptions and be easy to build your own KPIs."

"There is a module that we would like to have. We would like Qualibrate to design a requirements module so that we can design our testing, our flows, and our scenarios based on our actual requirements. Right now, we're doing that, but we're having to do it outside of Qualibrate. For example, in Excel, we might have a list of 50, 60, or 70 different requirements and combinations of tests that need to be executed, and since that module doesn't exist in Qualibrate, we're doing it offline. We have already vocalized that wishlist to them, and they have acknowledged it, but I have no idea when they're going to get around to deploying something like that. It is probably number one on our list."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine."

"We had an issue with SAP when using PDF forms. That was something that was not supported by Qualibrate, but we solved that issue by choosing another solution. That was the only wish we had with Qualibrate."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

"We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."

"The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker."

"We probably have 10 licenses, but I don't know what are the costs or anything like that."

"Automated testing is not cheap. But other companies, for example, Panaya, required a minimum of 10 licenses. Qualibrate allowed us to start small, with three licenses, with a price that was competitive within the market."

"Qualibrate is realistically priced. I can't compare it because I haven't looked at other tools, but I think it is good. What I like is you can simply add new users, if you want. It has a license model that comes with different types of users, which I think makes sense."

"I compared the prices of the 15 solutions we looked at. Qualibrate was the most valuable because it could be integrated with SAP Solution Manager."

"We signed a three-year contract and the pricing is in line with our expectations."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

Digital.ai Continuous Testing is a solid tool, but there are a few things that can be frustrating at times. One thing I noticed is that the initial setup and configuration can feel complex, especia...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The main use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing has been automating test execution as part of the CI/CD pipeline, especially for ensuring builds are stable before the release. For example, I us...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

TestObject vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 6% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 6% of the time

Xamarin Test Cloud vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 6% of the time

BrowserStack vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 5% of the time

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Qualibrate

Compared 10% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Qualibrate

Compared 9% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Qualibrate

Compared 7% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Qualibrate

Compared 6% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs Qualibrate

Compared 4% of the time

More Qualibrate Competitors

Product Reports

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Download Digital.ai Continuous Testing product report

Download Qualibrate product report

Also Known As

Experitest Seetest, Experitest

No data available

Overview

Digital.ai Continuous Testing offers automated testing with real device cloud access and CI/CD integration to efficiently manage web and mobile app testing, ensuring reliability and consistency.

Digital.ai Continuous Testing is designed to streamline testing by automating executions across multiple environments and devices, reducing manual efforts and speeding up feedback cycles. With features like cross-browser testing, and integration into CI/CD pipelines, it helps detect defects early and improve release quality. Users benefit from parallel and automated test executions for faster delivery and enhanced compatibility, leveraging Mobile Studio for versatile scripting. However, initial setup can be complex, and users note UI/UX improvements and issue navigation challenges. Despite these, it facilitates quality assurance through its comprehensive testing capabilities.

What are the key features of Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

Real Device Cloud Access: Provides extensive testing across different devices.
CI/CD Integration: Streamlines testing within development pipelines.
Automated Test Execution: Speeds up testing processes with parallel runs.
Cross-Browser Testing: Ensures compatibility and functionality across browsers.
Mobile Studio Scripting: Allows diverse scripting for mobile tests.

What benefits should users consider?

Efficiency Improvements: Significant reduction in manual testing efforts.
Time Savings: Faster feedback and early defect detection.
Reliability & Consistency: Better outcomes with multi-device testing.
Improved Release Quality: Higher delivery and compatibility standards.

Industries utilize Digital.ai Continuous Testing to automate and integrate testing within CI/CD pipelines for web and mobile applications, improving application quality by testing across varied devices and environments. It enhances release quality and delivery speed by verifying new features, detecting bugs early, and supporting accessibility testing. This facilitates rapid feedback by prioritizing critical tests and maintaining stability pre-release.

Digital.ai

Qualibrate is a leading solution for test automation, offering a low-code approach that simplifies automation tasks. Its integration with SAP Solution Manager ensures efficient test management, making it an ideal choice for organizations looking to streamline their testing processes.

Qualibrate provides user-friendly features that make test script recording and automation accessible to business personnel. It facilitates the reduction of transactions into end-to-end processes, allowing for seamless changes. The tool's integration with SAP Solution Manager enhances test planning, execution scheduling, and process flow management. Users utilize Qualibrate mainly for regression and user acceptance testing within SAP applications, automating standard change processes, and transitioning from manual to automated testing. Its capability to integrate with systems like ServiceNow and host operations in the cloud highlights its versatility in managing critical applications.

What are Qualibrate's most important features?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies test script recording with low-code features.
SAP Integration: Streamlines test management with SAP Solution Manager.
Test Planning: Offers scheduling tools for test execution.
End-to-End Processes: Allows conversion of transactions into comprehensive processes.
Dummy Data Reduction: Minimizes unnecessary data in testing environments.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Reduces manhours through automation of regression testing.
SAP Optimization: Enhances testing strategies specifically for SAP applications.
Cloud Hosting: Ensures reliable testing of critical applications in the cloud.
System Integration: Seamlessly operates with platforms like ServiceNow.

In industries heavily reliant on SAP applications, Qualibrate plays a key role in transitioning from manual to automated regression testing, significantly reducing development complexity. Organizations employing this tool can expect streamlined operations, especially in sectors requiring frequent updates and changes to SAP environments.

Sample Customers

Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee

AirFrance KLM, Provincie Noord Holland, Ministerie van Defensie, Nouryon, Bell Helicopter, Textron,

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Qualibrate