LambdaTest vs Qualibrate comparison

LambdaTest and Qualibrate are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. LambdaTest is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while Qualibrate is ranked #37. LambdaTest holds a 5.6% mindshare in FT, compared to Qualibrate’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of LambdaTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qualibrate users who would recommend it.

LambdaTest

Read 27 LambdaTest reviews

3,322 Views
3,023 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Qualibrate

Read 5 Qualibrate reviews

251 Views
188 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

Qualibrate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

LambdaTest and Qualibrate are competing products in the software testing domain. LambdaTest has the upper hand with competitive pricing and solid support, while Qualibrate is recognized for its comprehensive features, which justify its cost.

Features: LambdaTest offers automated testing across browsers and operating systems, integrates with popular CI/CD tools, and provides geolocation testing capabilities. Qualibrate delivers a full suite for testing, documentation, and training with automated script recording, process modeling, and the ability to manage end-to-end testing processes, providing a holistic solution.

Room for Improvement: LambdaTest could enhance feature comprehensiveness, increase support for more complex workflow integrations, and expand its automation capabilities. Qualibrate would benefit from a simpler interface, reduced deployment complexity, and a more competitive pricing structure for smaller teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LambdaTest offers easy deployment with robust online documentation and 24/7 support. Qualibrate presents a more complex deployment due to its extensive features but offers comprehensive onboarding and personalized customer support for seamless integration into existing workflows.

Pricing and ROI: LambdaTest provides a lower entry cost with flexible pricing tiers, allowing for faster ROI for straightforward testing needs. Qualibrate involves a higher initial investment but rewards customers with efficiency and quality improvements over time.

To learn more, read our detailed LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,624 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qualibrate

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

38th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of LambdaTest is 5.6%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualibrate is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Dinesh Saharan

Presales at Net Solutions

The tool reduces the manual effort needed and helps automate certain tasks for users

I won't be able to comment on what could be improved in the solution since I am not the one who handles LambdaTest. It is our company's IT team that takes care of LambdaTest. Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis. If something is perfect, it doesn't mean that it doesn't need to improvise or improve, like in terms of adding new features. There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time.

Read full review

Reviewer148493

Test Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Reduces our testing time significantly, enabling us to release more frequently

The most valuable feature is the way it works, the usability. From the first setup, the user interface is the most beautiful. It's very nice the way you can recover things and make it work. We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate. Because everything we do is in SAP Solution Manager, we are now able to do test automatization, combined with Qualibrate. All the defects are available in SAP Solution Manager and all the changes will be in Qualibrate, immediately. From Qualibrate, we see whether tests are good or not. We can create a test-related incident in Solution Manager for those that are not good, and Test Suite in Solution Manager will notify the person who has to rebuild it. That works very nicely.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The primary feature that has significantly improved our test execution times is automation."

"The solution is very easy to understand and has a user-friendly UI."

"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."

"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."

"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."

"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."

"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"

"It is a scalable solution."

More LambdaTest pros

"The widget's ease of use is the most valuable, which means it allows you or business people to record the automated test scripts. In most cases, it is really good because it is the business people who actually know how the system is being used. The simplicity of the design is valuable, where you can record your transactions, then create your automated scripts. You can automate it at the same time, and the automation features are cool."

"What Qualibrate makes very easy to do is to record a process flow. Within five minutes you have a clear document produced by Qualibrate. Instead of using Word, and copying and pasting pictures into it from printscreens, within five minutes what you have was easy to make and it's easy for users to use."

"The most valuable feature is that it's user-friendly."

"We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate."

"It is the principle functionality that we're leveraging, which really can be defined as recordings and playbacks. So, you record the scripts that you want to execute and you also want to be able to playback. So, these are the features that we are largely leveraging. There are flows and scenarios, and they are the design aspects that fit within the playback and the recording solution. For me, they are the core of Qualibrate, and that's what we're using."

Cons

"The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting."

"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."

"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."

"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."

"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us."

"We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."

"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."

"Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency."

More LambdaTest cons

"There is a module that we would like to have. We would like Qualibrate to design a requirements module so that we can design our testing, our flows, and our scenarios based on our actual requirements. Right now, we're doing that, but we're having to do it outside of Qualibrate. For example, in Excel, we might have a list of 50, 60, or 70 different requirements and combinations of tests that need to be executed, and since that module doesn't exist in Qualibrate, we're doing it offline. We have already vocalized that wishlist to them, and they have acknowledged it, but I have no idea when they're going to get around to deploying something like that. It is probably number one on our list."

"What I would really like to see is if you are running scripts in Qualibrate, and there is a defect, then you can have it automatically raise a defect in your own ticketing system."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine. It does have reporting, i.e., a dashboard, but it is preconfigured, predefined KPIs and datasets. That could be improved because the datasets don't have descriptions, so you really need to know what you're doing. Whereas, it would be great if it could have more descriptions and be easy to build your own KPIs."

"We had an issue with SAP when using PDF forms. That was something that was not supported by Qualibrate, but we solved that issue by choosing another solution. That was the only wish we had with Qualibrate."

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate. There is a development tool called xpath and you have to program it. We always thought it wouldn't be necessary to program it with Qualibrate, that everything could be solved by Qualibrate without programming, but you have to program some things. Using xpath is more complicated, and not easy for everybody. It would be helpful if there were a no-code solution for this."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."

"The product can be described as an averagely-priced solution."

"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

"LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

"This is an affordable product."

"I used the product for free."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

"We probably have 10 licenses, but I don't know what are the costs or anything like that."

"Automated testing is not cheap. But other companies, for example, Panaya, required a minimum of 10 licenses. Qualibrate allowed us to start small, with three licenses, with a price that was competitive within the market."

"I compared the prices of the 15 solutions we looked at. Qualibrate was the most valuable because it could be integrated with SAP Solution Manager."

"We signed a three-year contract and the pricing is in line with our expectations."

"Qualibrate is realistically priced. I can't compare it because I haven't looked at other tools, but I think it is good. What I like is you can simply add new users, if you want. It has a license model that comes with different types of users, which I think makes sense."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting. There are specific use cases related to authentication and authoriz...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 66% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 14% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Katalon Studio vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 2% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

July 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualibrate

July 2025

Download Qualibrate product report

Overview

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

LambdaTest

Undertaking a software transformation journey is a high risk. We offer a simple yet powerful solution to minimize the risk and reduce the implementation resources up to 80%.

Qualibrate is the cloud solution for SAP & web apps test automation, like Salesforce: it has the power of simplicity, customization, and integration with the most CI/CD tools. Test cases are highly reusable and easily maintainable.

All you need to do is to record a Business Process: user actions, test data, and technical information will be captured. The recording will be your unique source of truth for running Automated tests and Manual tests, but also for Learning.

Qualibrate

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

AirFrance KLM, Provincie Noord Holland, Ministerie van Defensie, Nouryon, Bell Helicopter, Textron,

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate

July 2025

Free Report: LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate

Find out what your peers are saying about LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.