LambdaTest vs Qualibrate comparison

LambdaTest and Qualibrate are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. LambdaTest is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8, while Qualibrate is ranked #35. LambdaTest holds a 4.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Qualibrate’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of LambdaTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qualibrate users who would recommend it.

LambdaTest

Read 28 LambdaTest reviews

2,668 Views
2,321 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Qualibrate

Read 5 Qualibrate reviews

481 Views
322 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

Qualibrate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 27, 2025

LambdaTest and Qualibrate compete in the digital testing space, offering unique features and benefits. Qualibrate appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and long-term value, despite LambdaTest being well-regarded for its pricing and support.

Features: LambdaTest offers cross-browser testing, a user-friendly test automation interface, and geolocation testing in automation, further supported by integration with CI/CD tools like Jenkins and GitLab. Qualibrate focuses on process-oriented testing with integrated process and test automation features, a low-code approach for ease of use, and a central script management system that enhances end-to-end workflows.

Room for Improvement: LambdaTest could enhance device support, improve real device testing consistency, and offer lower-cost real-time testing options. Qualibrate might benefit from streamlining its deployment process, expanding integration capabilities with non-SAP systems, and offering more flexibility in customizing automated scripts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LambdaTest provides quick cloud-based deployment with rapid integration, being supported by responsive customer assistance. In contrast, Qualibrate offers a structured, detailed deployment process coupled with strong support, aligning with its detailed workflow approach.

Pricing and ROI: LambdaTest stands out with competitive pricing and flexible plans, suitable for smaller setups. Its ROI is substantial given its cost-effective nature. Qualibrate, though higher in setup cost, balances it with robust ROI and enhanced testing capabilities, offering greater value for comprehensive process integration over time.

To learn more, read our detailed LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,255 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

6th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qualibrate

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

35th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

33rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of LambdaTest is 4.7%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualibrate is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
LambdaTest	4.7%
Qualibrate	0.8%
Other	94.5%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Kumar Gaurav Jain

Head of QA at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Cross-platform testing and faster execution enhance testing efficiency

Don't worry about anything. Just go for it. There will not be an issue, as far as you know what you are buying and how you want to use it. Go for it, the platform is good. I rate the solution eight out of ten due to some areas needing improvement. I rate the overall solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Reviewer148493

Test Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Reduces our testing time significantly, enabling us to release more frequently

The most valuable feature is the way it works, the usability. From the first setup, the user interface is the most beautiful. It's very nice the way you can recover things and make it work. We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate. Because everything we do is in SAP Solution Manager, we are now able to do test automatization, combined with Qualibrate. All the defects are available in SAP Solution Manager and all the changes will be in Qualibrate, immediately. From Qualibrate, we see whether tests are good or not. We can create a test-related incident in Solution Manager for those that are not good, and Test Suite in Solution Manager will notify the person who has to rebuild it. That works very nicely.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."

"We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."

"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."

"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"

"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."

"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."

"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."

"Automation and mobile testing have improved our efficiency."

More LambdaTest pros

"We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate."

"The widget's ease of use is the most valuable, which means it allows you or business people to record the automated test scripts. In most cases, it is really good because it is the business people who actually know how the system is being used. The simplicity of the design is valuable, where you can record your transactions, then create your automated scripts. You can automate it at the same time, and the automation features are cool."

"It is the principle functionality that we're leveraging, which really can be defined as recordings and playbacks. So, you record the scripts that you want to execute and you also want to be able to playback. So, these are the features that we are largely leveraging. There are flows and scenarios, and they are the design aspects that fit within the playback and the recording solution. For me, they are the core of Qualibrate, and that's what we're using."

"What Qualibrate makes very easy to do is to record a process flow. Within five minutes you have a clear document produced by Qualibrate. Instead of using Word, and copying and pasting pictures into it from printscreens, within five minutes what you have was easy to make and it's easy for users to use."

"The most valuable feature is that it's user-friendly."

Cons

"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."

"Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency."

"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."

"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."

"We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."

"The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting."

"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."

"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."

More LambdaTest cons

"We had an issue with SAP when using PDF forms. That was something that was not supported by Qualibrate, but we solved that issue by choosing another solution. That was the only wish we had with Qualibrate."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine. It does have reporting, i.e., a dashboard, but it is preconfigured, predefined KPIs and datasets. That could be improved because the datasets don't have descriptions, so you really need to know what you're doing. Whereas, it would be great if it could have more descriptions and be easy to build your own KPIs."

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate. There is a development tool called xpath and you have to program it. We always thought it wouldn't be necessary to program it with Qualibrate, that everything could be solved by Qualibrate without programming, but you have to program some things. Using xpath is more complicated, and not easy for everybody. It would be helpful if there were a no-code solution for this."

"There is a module that we would like to have. We would like Qualibrate to design a requirements module so that we can design our testing, our flows, and our scenarios based on our actual requirements. Right now, we're doing that, but we're having to do it outside of Qualibrate. For example, in Excel, we might have a list of 50, 60, or 70 different requirements and combinations of tests that need to be executed, and since that module doesn't exist in Qualibrate, we're doing it offline. We have already vocalized that wishlist to them, and they have acknowledged it, but I have no idea when they're going to get around to deploying something like that. It is probably number one on our list."

"What I would really like to see is if you are running scripts in Qualibrate, and there is a defect, then you can have it automatically raise a defect in your own ticketing system."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."

"The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it."

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."

"This is an affordable product."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

"We probably have 10 licenses, but I don't know what are the costs or anything like that."

"I compared the prices of the 15 solutions we looked at. Qualibrate was the most valuable because it could be integrated with SAP Solution Manager."

"Qualibrate is realistically priced. I can't compare it because I haven't looked at other tools, but I think it is good. What I like is you can simply add new users, if you want. It has a license model that comes with different types of users, which I think makes sense."

"We signed a three-year contract and the pricing is in line with our expectations."

"Automated testing is not cheap. But other companies, for example, Panaya, required a minimum of 10 licenses. Qualibrate allowed us to start small, with three licenses, with a price that was competitive within the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,255 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting. There are specific use cases related to authentication and authoriz...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 49% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 14% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 6% of the time

QA Wolf vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Qualibrate

Compared 41% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Qualibrate

Compared 30% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Qualibrate

Compared 30% of the time

More Qualibrate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

January 2026

Download LambdaTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualibrate

December 2025

Download Qualibrate product report

Overview

LambdaTest offers real-time and automated testing across extensive browser and OS combinations with integrations like Jenkins and GitLab. It combines legacy and real device access for diverse compatibility, enhancing functionality and execution speed with HyperExecute and Docker tunneling.

Geared for businesses requiring robust browser compatibility, LambdaTest simplifies large-scale testing needs with seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. Its automation features and parallel testing capabilities help detect UI misalignments quickly while reducing manual efforts. LambdaTest supports cross-browser functionality with comprehensive documentation and platform fusions like AWS for enhanced utility.

What key features make LambdaTest indispensable?

Intuitive Interface: Streamlines user experience.
Real-Time Testing: Thousands of browser and OS combinations available.
Tool Integration: Compatible with Jenkins and GitLab.
Automation and Parallel Testing: Efficient test cycles and process streamlining.
Legacy and Real Device Access: Ensures broad compatibility.
HyperExecute: Boosts execution speed significantly.
Docker Tunnel: Enables local testing with ease.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Comprehensive Documentation: Ensures ease of use and knowledge sharing.
Enhanced Performance: Fusions with platforms like AWS offer improved efficiency.
Global User Compatibility: Reduces manual testing, boosts customer experience.
CI/CD Integration: Consistent performance across teams.
Efficient Resource Utilization: Lowered manual testing efforts and cost efficiency.

In industries demanding high browser compatibility and web responsiveness, teams integrate LambdaTest for automation, real-time testing, and maintaining global user experience standards. Its use in parallel testing cycles alongside industry-driven integrations minimizes timelines and optimizes workflows effectively.

LambdaTest

Undertaking a software transformation journey is a high risk. We offer a simple yet powerful solution to minimize the risk and reduce the implementation resources up to 80%.

Qualibrate is the cloud solution for SAP & web apps test automation, like Salesforce: it has the power of simplicity, customization, and integration with the most CI/CD tools. Test cases are highly reusable and easily maintainable.

All you need to do is to record a Business Process: user actions, test data, and technical information will be captured. The recording will be your unique source of truth for running Automated tests and Manual tests, but also for Learning.

Qualibrate

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

AirFrance KLM, Provincie Noord Holland, Ministerie van Defensie, Nouryon, Bell Helicopter, Textron,

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate

December 2025

Free Report: LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate

Find out what your peers are saying about LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,255 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.