

NetApp FAS Series and Dell PowerProtect Data Manager compete in the data protection and management category. NetApp FAS Series has the upper hand in performance stability and protocol integration, while Dell PowerProtect Data Manager is preferred for its data protection in virtualized environments.
Features: NetApp FAS Series supports high availability through clustered architectures and integrates multiple data protocols, offering effective deduplication for complex storage needs. SnapMirror provides excellent data protection, making it a top choice for high-performance stability. Dell PowerProtect Data Manager excels in containerized environments with strong data reduction and ease of deployment capabilities, though it lacks a comprehensive unified management tool.
Room for Improvement: NetApp FAS Series needs better integration with all-flash systems and more efficient customer support. Users seek simplified migration and configuration processes and better third-party integration. Dell PowerProtect Data Manager requires improvements in third-party technology integration and first-level support. Enhancements in scalability and single-solution capabilities for hybrid infrastructures are essential.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp FAS Series offers versatile deployment for on-premises and private cloud, with generally positive technical support, despite some concerns over responsiveness. Dell PowerProtect Data Manager is deployed both on-premises and hybrid cloud, though users note the need for improved user interface support. Customer service experiences are mixed, with attention to support highlighted by some users.
Pricing and ROI: NetApp FAS Series is seen as costly, affecting purchase decisions, but users are satisfied with ROI, particularly in VMware settings, due to reduced operational costs through consolidation. Dell PowerProtect Data Manager offers competitive pricing and flexible licensing, appealing for cost-efficient data management, though users may face additional costs for extra features. Both products provide value, but pricing can heavily influence choice based on organizational needs and budget considerations.
Previously they had somewhere around 100 TB of capacity for the backup for a few VMs on one side. Now, the overall setup is hardly 80 TB, where they use almost 240 TB of production data into that 80 TB.
I would recommend Dell PowerProtect Data Manager to other organizations because it is cost-effective and delivers good performance compared to alternative solutions.
I do find that with Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, the ROI is good when compared to other Dell products, but when compared to others in the current market, such as Cohesity or Veeam, it is not as good.
If you have the configuration well maintained and configured, you should have good efficiency and compression for the clients and for yourself.
Dell provides reliable support for PowerProtect Data Manager, with 24/7 availability and a qualified support team.
My experience with the technical support team of Dell is that they are actually great.
When we had the compliances and any of the backups were getting failed or we identified that some of the backups were frequently failing, the system would alert us.
Sometimes, the support was inadequate because the initial architecture was poorly defined.
We are also using it ourselves for the SAN and CIFS protocol.
They often provide basic solutions, such as suggesting a failover or a power cycle, which are not the sophisticated solutions we expect from a vendor.
Its capability to back up existing environments can be improved, particularly when it comes to disaster recovery in the cloud.
As per the documentation, that is an easy process, whether you need to scale up or scale out.
If you are okay to purchase the license, they have the feasibility to increase the capacity as well.
We normally avoid current versions and use versions that have been running for at least two months in client usage before updating drivers.
NetApp FAS Series is scalable, and it is possible, but you need to pay.
The NetApp FAS Series is scalable and offers numerous solutions, but only if customers are willing to invest in the shelves.
It is extremely reliable and I have never experienced a crash.
Making sure the system is properly understood before deployment and handling upgrades efficiently would improve stability.
I would assess the stability and reliability of Dell PowerProtect Data Manager as quite stable; there are no issues with the workloads I am using.
When panic occurs on the node, it reboots itself, and we have experienced numerous hardware-related issues.
Most things are tailor-made, and we avoid downtimes even with primitive CLI commands.
I would like to see improvements that include bare metal restore capabilities and enhanced data restore features in Dell PowerProtect Data Manager.
This is an enterprise solution and a bit costlier, but it is a solution where people should be looking into if they want to go into one single umbrella and have the centralized backup solution, which integrates with the cloud and can manage their cloud workload as well as the on-premises workload, and can be managed with one dashboard.
Enhancements for microservices and container backups would be beneficial, enabling a more consolidated management platform for modern architectures.
Storage companies should create encrypted storage solutions between the OS and storage to protect against ransomware attacks.
Nutanix leads the business in this approach, and I feel that NetApp is missing some aspects, such as CPU, GPU, and RAM, in its AI portfolio.
There is an opportunity there for NetApp with Cloud Volumes ONTAP.
Dell PowerProtect Data Manager is cost-effective, as it is licensed per socket rather than by workload.
Overall, pricing does not significantly impact our decision.
compared to some other products, it is a bit more costly.
The pricing of NetApp FAS Series is not cheap, but in comparison to other vendors, NetApp FAS Series is affordable.
It provides a seamless backup solution integrated with a dashboard full of capabilities, enhancing recovery point objectives and recovery time objectives.
It satisfies my customers' scalability needs and provides interactive features, allowing efficient integration.
Compared to other products such as Veritas, Dell offers more competitive pricing while other vendors charge significantly more.
While NVMe disks are expensive and require three disks for parity calculations, hard drives in NetApp FAS Series are inexpensive, making it more cost-efficient per GB, even with RAID tech implementation.
Our IOPS are very high, reaching somewhere about 50k to 150k or 1.150k.
One important feature for customers is its ease of use and continuity, enabling seamless usage across on-premise and cloud environments.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| NetApp FAS Series | 3.8% |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Manager | 12.3% |
| Other | 83.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 31 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 38 |
| Large Enterprise | 58 |
Dell PowerProtect Data Manager provides efficient backup and recovery for hybrid and multicloud environments. It consolidates VMware, Kubernetes, database, and file system protection through a singular interface.
PowerProtect Data Manager is a software-defined platform that integrates modern backup and recovery capabilities, focusing on enhancing performance metrics like RPO and RTO. It supports operations through automated discovery, policy-driven protection, and intelligent analytics while offering cloud mobility and robust cyber recovery mechanisms. Its architecture is designed to address complex data management needs while providing flexibility, backup efficiency, and capacity management. With capabilities spanning on-premise and cloud options, it delivers a comprehensive approach for data protection.
What key features make Dell PowerProtect Data Manager stand out?Organizations in telecom and enterprise sectors employ Dell PowerProtect Data Manager for backing up and securing data in virtual and cloud-native environments. It supports continuous data protection for VMware and Kubernetes and plays a crucial role in ensuring container stability in platforms like OpenShift. Its native application integrations and disaster recovery through incremental backups make it suitable for larger businesses seeking a reliable data management partner.
NetApp FAS series is an enterprise-level storage system that provides a wide variety of data management services, including data protection, block and file storage, and data management.
NetApp FAS is designed to be highly scalable, allowing your organization to grow storage capacity on demand. NetApp FAS also supports multiple protocols, including NFS, SMB, iSCSI, and Fibre Channel, as well as various storage architectures, including SAN (Storage Area Network) and NAS (Network-Attached Storage).
The FAS series has multiple data protection and data management features, including snapshots, cloning, replication, and deduplication, to help secure your data and manage it more efficiently. The system integrates with other NetApp products and solutions, to create a unified data management platform. The system can be deployed on-premise, on multi-cloud environments, or hybrid.
NetApp FAS Series Benefits and Features
NetApp FAS series provides its users with several key benefits and features, including:
Reviews from Real Users
NetApp FAS Series stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its speed, reliability, and a wide variety of features.
Adriano S., IT project and infrastructure service manager, writes, “The replication feature is noteworthy because it's faster than most and it uses little bandwidth. Then there's the friendly interface that the equipment offers. With this interface, it is very easy to manage.”
Temitope O., a NetApp product manager at Hiperdist Ltd, says, “I like the unified management feature because sometimes you end up running a single protocol on the entire system. You rather have a system for a particular protocol and another system for other protocols, especially in a big environment like mine.”
We monitor all Deduplication Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.