Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs New Relic comparison

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 176 New Relic reviews

22,559 Views
15,340 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

New Relic and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management are two prominent tools used for managing application performance. While many find New Relic's pricing and support options more satisfactory, Cross-Enterprise is noted for its advanced troubleshooting capabilities, making it a superior choice for critical operations.

Features: New Relic offers comprehensive monitoring, real-time insights, and robust analytics. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management provides advanced troubleshooting capabilities, detailed transaction tracking, and extensive scalability, making it better suited for critical operations.

Room for Improvement: New Relic could benefit from more customization options, advanced reporting tools, and enhanced alert mechanisms. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management users highlight the need for simplified configuration, better integration capabilities, and a more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: New Relic has a straightforward deployment process and effective customer support, making it accessible to a wide range of businesses. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is more complex to deploy but is backed by high-quality customer service that assists with its sophisticated setup.

Pricing and ROI: New Relic users report favorable setup costs and a good return on investment due to its practical pricing model. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, despite its higher initial costs, is considered worth the investment by users because of its comprehensive and in-depth features.

To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. New Relic Report (Updated: June 2026).

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. New Relic

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

85th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

New Relic

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

176

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (9th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (9th), IT Operations Analytics (3rd), Mobile APM (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd), AIOps (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of New Relic is 3.8%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
New Relic	3.8%
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management	0.4%
Other	95.8%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

BasilJiji

System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Real-time alerts have reduced server outage impact and support fast incident response

In the dashboard, if they could show a little more metrics regarding the application and related things, that would be how New Relic could be improved. Currently, there are things showing from the server level and application level, but it can be improved. That is what I felt. Regarding user interface, I do not feel much concern, but for some kind of issues when we are trying to get support from the New Relic team, their SLA seems to be long. They are taking seven to ten working days for resolving some kind of scenario or issue. That is a bit difficult for us. If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful. When it comes to the customer support part, I felt they need to be a little more improved on that part. The support overall is good, but they can improve. That is the reason I have given it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

"The documentation and the technical support are both quite good."

"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."

"It’s a solid product; they continue to innovate year after year, and they’re a very solid product and a very solid company."

"They have baseline level alerting."

"The ease of use, the information you can get out of it from the very little things you do – you get so much out of it."

"New Relic is great for DevOps and for a company that expects developers to do their own operations."

"New Relic has positively impacted my organization by providing peace of mind to my clients, and it also gives a lot of insight to their marketing department on how users interact with their websites or how they work with them."

"We have been able to proactively identify failures before they happen."

"The synthetic alert is the most valuable feature in New Relic APM. I also like the time travel feature and find traceability useful in the solution. New Relic APM also has good response times."

More New Relic pros

Cons

"There is still a lot of improvement that is needed in terms of stability. We figured out that it was not able to monitor or offer some forms of self-service capabilities."

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

"The support could improve because they are not very fast and the information was not very accurate."

"Probably make the query language a little bit easier."

"New Relic is very slow, and the app is a bit frustrating to use, which is something that has been happening a lot in the past year. During the last six months, I have noticed that it has become extremely laggy."

"I chose a rating of 8 out of 10 because the UI requires me to dig in and find the needed traces, and it can be more user-friendly."

"From a point of view of showing you what to do fine but in terms of showing you what to do with the data infuriatingly unhelpful."

"I'd like second-by-second monitoring, instead of a five-minute lag time."

"Sometimes it works really slow, but I think it depends on the organization-to-organization usage."

"New Relic APM is a good tool, and it has a database of failures, but it could use a list of customer-specific failures. New Relic APM should be able to give my company advanced analytics through AI."

More New Relic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

"Cost is significant with a lot of extras."

"The pricing model is a little confusing for beginners. They find it a little expensive, and if you are using it already, then that is not good."

"This solution required a license and it is better than some other competitors."

"The pricing is fine."

"The price of the solution could be less expensive. You have to pay a lot for each user. There is an additional cost for extra features."

"The pricing and licensing are too high."

"I loved this product, but we can no longer afford it, so we dropped it."

"They gave us aggressive discounts when they were brought in for the first time, but they have also kept them for the year-on-year renewals, which has been absolutely fine."

More New Relic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	65
Midsize Enterprise	52
Large Enterprise	79

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...

What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?

While I appreciate many aspects of New Relic, I believe the product could improve in some areas—specifically, some advanced capabilities can have a learning curve for new users, and the licensing a...

What is your primary use case for New Relic Insights?

Since I'm a performance engineer, I typically use New Relic day-to-day for investigating any performance bottlenecks identified during our performance testing of any application. I look at the resu...

Zabbix vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Comparisons

Compared 34% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 26% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 11% of the time

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

Kloudfuse vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Competitors

Datadog vs New Relic

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs New Relic

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs New Relic

Compared 4% of the time

Azure Monitor vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

More New Relic Competitors

Product Reports

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download New Relic product report

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM

Overview

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management provides comprehensive insight into application performance across organizational boundaries. Designed to address complex application ecosystems, it ensures efficient monitoring and management of performance metrics, enhancing IT operations.

With Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, organizations can leverage a centralized approach to detecting, diagnosing, and resolving performance issues. The platform's analytics allow for proactive management by identifying trends and anomalies across applications. By offering end-to-end visibility into transactions and resource utilizations, it supports significant improvements in operational efficiency.

What are the key features?

End-to-End Monitoring: Comprehensive monitoring across all components of the application landscape.
Centralized Dashboard: Aggregated data view for quick insights and decision-making.
Real-Time Analytics: Immediate data processing to detect and respond to issues quickly.
Anomaly Detection: Advanced algorithms identify deviations for proactive troubleshooting.
Resource Management: Optimize application resources through detailed usage analysis.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Improved Performance: By leveraging analytics, boost application efficiency and uptime.
Cost Efficiency: Reduced downtimes translate to lower operational costs.
Enhanced Decision Making: Access to reliable data leads to informed strategic decisions.
Increased Productivity: Swift issue resolution improves overall productivity.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management integrates seamlessly to handle complex transactional systems. Its ability to provide real-time visibility and comprehensive analytics means that these sectors can ensure compliance and maintain high service standards.

Broadcom

New Relic offers real-time application monitoring and insight into performance bottlenecks. Its customizable dashboards and APM integration provide efficient operational support, while server performance alerts ensure quick issue detection.

New Relic provides comprehensive monitoring of application performance, tracking bottlenecks across databases and front-end components. Users employ it for server and infrastructure monitoring, as well as analyzing key metrics such as CPU and memory usage. The solution's ability to integrate with tools like PagerDuty enhances incident management capabilities. However, users have expressed a need for improvements in query language simplicity, more detailed historical insights, and better mobile app monitoring support.

What are New Relic's most important features?

Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant visibility into application performance.
Detailed Transaction Tracing: Identifies specific transaction issues quickly.
Error Rate Tracking: Monitors and reports on error occurrences efficiently.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors dashboard views for specific needs.
APM Integration: Seamlessly integrates with application performance management tools.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Operational Efficiency: Quick issue detection reduces downtime.
Improved Debugging: Enhanced error analysis supports rapid problem resolution.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Offers a holistic view of application performance and user behavior.
Incident Management: Integration with incident tools helps streamline responses.
Efficient Alerts: Rapid alert systems ensure timely notifications of issues.

In industries like e-commerce and financial services, New Relic supports application performance monitoring to enhance user experience and system reliability. Organizations leverage its insights for optimizing performance, particularly in server operations and infrastructure management. Its ability to monitor API failures through synthetic monitoring is crucial for maintaining high service levels.

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. New Relic