Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs Zabbix comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and Zabbix are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #82, while Zabbix is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. Broadcom holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to Zabbix’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Zabbix users who would recommend it.

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 2 Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reviews

1,803 Views
1,767 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Zabbix

Read 110 Zabbix reviews

39,735 Views
10,331 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Zabbix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Zabbix and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management (CEPAM) offer distinct solutions in performance monitoring. CEPAM appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and superior customer service, despite Zabbix's strong points in affordability and comprehensive support.

Features: Zabbix users value its extensive monitoring capabilities, ease of integration, and customizable alerts. CEPAM offers robust analytics, real-time data processing, and scalability. While Zabbix's features are impressive, the advanced analytics and scalability of CEPAM give it an edge.

Room for Improvement: Zabbix needs enhancements in scalability, user experience, and documentation. CEPAM users suggest improvements in documentation, cost management, and user interface. Both products have specific areas for growth, but Zabbix's scalability issues are particularly significant.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zabbix users find it fairly straightforward to deploy but highlight the need for improved customer service. CEPAM is appreciated for its smooth deployment process and excellent customer service, making it more appealing in those areas.

Pricing and ROI: Zabbix is praised for its low setup costs and quick ROI. CEPAM, despite higher initial costs, offers significant long-term ROI due to its advanced features. Users find Zabbix more cost-effective initially, but CEPAM's long-term benefits justify the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,148 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

82nd

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zabbix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

110

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (1st), Server Monitoring (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 2.3%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zabbix	2.3%
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management	0.4%
Other	97.3%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

Priya Jaiswar

Developer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Unified monitoring has reduced outages and enables proactive fixes with automated remediation

My favorite best feature is the ability to manage complex hybrid environments from a single dashboard. Zabbix natively supports monitoring everything from Linux servers and Windows servers to network devices and cloud infrastructure. The view I rely on the most on a day-to-day basis is a custom dashboard combining the problem widget and graph widget. The problem widget gives me an immediate filtered snapshot of the active alerts across all our servers. I pair that with the graph widget, which allows me to track performance metrics and compare values over time, such as monitoring storage and capacity trends on our Synology appliance. Having all of this in a single pane of glass saves me from constantly digging through logs. I also rely heavily on custom dashboards that combine the problem widget and the top host widget. The problem widget gives me an immediate filtered list of any active alerts across the entire environment. I pair that with the top host widget, which instantly shows me which servers are consuming the highest resources. Having all of these related metrics side-by-side in a single view allows me to spot the issue and identify the exact server causing it without having to dig through separate tools. Zabbix has built-in machine learning for continuous anomaly detection and proactive trend prediction. It establishes a baseline by analyzing historical data, allowing it to forecast impending issues, such as predicting exactly when a system will run out of resources before critical thresholds are breached. From a governance and security perspective, it delivers enterprise-grade security by supporting full data encryption and integration with external secret vaults to protect sensitive credentials. From a governance perspective, it features detailed configuration change tracking and role-based user permissions, which allows administrators to secure different teams or tenants within a single environment. Regarding accuracy, Zabbix's proactive alerts are highly accurate and trustworthy, provided they are fed enough historical data to establish a solid baseline. Regarding reliability and output, the prediction outputs are extremely reliable because Zabbix relies on transparent statistical mathematics, such as standard deviation and weighted moving averages, rather than a closed black box AI model. The straightforward statistical approach allows administrators to forecast value reliability and predict exactly how much time they have before a system reaches a critical problem threshold.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

"The documentation and the technical support are both quite good."

"Scalability, everything can be monitored."

"Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures."

"They've already added extra features, such as noise-canceling and facial recognition, which is great."

"Zabbix allows us to monitor a lot of hardware equipment without any additional cost."

"During my testing, the features that I like the most are that it can be integrated with my system, and it provides me with reports of all of my servers."

"Dashboard and the customization of the items and triggers are the most valuable features."

"Because the core Zabbix platform is open source and we self-host it, we pay zero in software licensing fees, and even with unlimited hosts and metrics, this saves us tens of thousands of dollars annually compared to commercial tools that charge per device."

"The features I found most valuable are the user interface and a wide range of network devices that are easy to configure."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

"There is still a lot of improvement that is needed in terms of stability. We figured out that it was not able to monitor or offer some forms of self-service capabilities."

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"There are a lot of things that can use improvement which is why we are seeking a new solution."

"They need to improve the APM solution, the Application Management solution."

"The potential and customization is a little difficult because you have to learn scripts."

"Zabbix can use better documentation and support for troubleshooting."

"I think ZABBIX needs improved report functions."

"Correlation of events would be a wonderful addition."

"It hasn't really been that stable, but I think that has a lot to do with the specs. It could be more stable."

"We would like to monitor other touchpoints such as ATM machines. It would be great if it can provide monitoring of ATM machines. Compatibility with other products would also be great."

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

"There is a license required for this solution and we pay annually for our license."

"The product is an open source and free solution."

"It is reasonable."

"If you have 20,000 hosts, the support costs around €95,000 for a year."

"Zabbix and Grafana are both open source products, we only needed to go to their website and download the application and we began to use them. The solutions are free."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"Zabbix is a free solution but the support contact costs money."

"It is worth every cent to pay or even study to do your own installation."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

I think Zabbix is economical, whereas SolarWinds is expensive. SolarWinds has a lot of secure features, but Zabbix is providing everything free of cost. Zabbix is economical, and you can install it...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

The initial configuration has a steep learning curve because Zabbix is so flexible and customizable. Setting up the right templates, pre-shows, and scripts requires a lot of deep Linux and system k...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zabbix?

On a day-to-day basis, I use Zabbix to monitor our entire infrastructure stack, including our Linux servers, Active Directory, domain controller, and Synology NAS storage array. A specific problem ...

See all answers

Comparisons

eG Enterprise vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 15% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 4% of the time

Raygun APM vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Competitors

Nagios XI vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

Zenoss Cloud vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Zabbix

October 2026

Download Zabbix product report

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

No data available

Overview

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management provides comprehensive insight into application performance across organizational boundaries. Designed to address complex application ecosystems, it ensures efficient monitoring and management of performance metrics, enhancing IT operations.

With Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, organizations can leverage a centralized approach to detecting, diagnosing, and resolving performance issues. The platform's analytics allow for proactive management by identifying trends and anomalies across applications. By offering end-to-end visibility into transactions and resource utilizations, it supports significant improvements in operational efficiency.

What are the key features?

End-to-End Monitoring: Comprehensive monitoring across all components of the application landscape.
Centralized Dashboard: Aggregated data view for quick insights and decision-making.
Real-Time Analytics: Immediate data processing to detect and respond to issues quickly.
Anomaly Detection: Advanced algorithms identify deviations for proactive troubleshooting.
Resource Management: Optimize application resources through detailed usage analysis.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Improved Performance: By leveraging analytics, boost application efficiency and uptime.
Cost Efficiency: Reduced downtimes translate to lower operational costs.
Enhanced Decision Making: Access to reliable data leads to informed strategic decisions.
Increased Productivity: Swift issue resolution improves overall productivity.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management integrates seamlessly to handle complex transactional systems. Its ability to provide real-time visibility and comprehensive analytics means that these sectors can ensure compliance and maintain high service standards.

Broadcom

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Zabbix

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba

Buyer's Guide

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix

November 2026

Free Report: Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix

Find out what your peers are saying about Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.