Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs Datadog comparison

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 209 Datadog reviews

25,621 Views
13,579 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Datadog and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management compete in the performance monitoring and observability tools category. Datadog seems to have the upper hand with integration ease and analytics flexibility, while Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management offers a robust feature set tailored for complex IT environments.

Features: Datadog provides comprehensive monitoring across diverse systems, featuring powerful dashboards and an extensive set of integrations. It supports various cloud environments and offers real-time visibility into infrastructure metrics and logs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management stands out with deep-dive performance analytics and customization options designed for large enterprise architectures, offering targeted insights and specialized monitoring for enterprise applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog is recognized for its straightforward, cloud-native deployment, allowing rapid and scalable integrations with minimal configuration. It offers customer-centric support to facilitate smoother implementation. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management requires more intricate setup processes but provides tailored deployment options and specialized support, effectively catering to complex enterprise requirements.

Pricing and ROI: Datadog is known for its competitive pricing models and offers quick ROI, making it suitable for businesses prioritizing fast and efficient observability solutions. Specific pricing information can vary based on the plan and usage. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management may involve higher upfront costs; however, its enterprise-focused capabilities often justify the investment through enhanced performance insights and operational efficiency, delivering significant ROI for larger organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Datadog Report (Updated: March 2026).

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Datadog

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

50th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Datadog

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

209

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Log Management (4th), Container Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), AI Observability (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datadog is 5.2%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Datadog	5.2%
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management	0.4%
Other	94.4%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

Dhroov Patel

Site Reliability Engineer at Grainger

Has improved incident response with better root cause visibility and supports flexible on-call scheduling

Datadog needs to introduce more hard limits to cost. If we see a huge log spike, administrators should have more control over what happens to save costs. If a service starts logging extensively, I want the ability to automatically direct that log into the cheapest log bucket. This should be the case with many offerings. If we're seeing too much APM, we need to be aware of it and able to stop it rather than having administrators reach out to specific teams. Datadog has become significantly slower over the last year. They could improve performance at the risk of slowing down feature work. More resources need to go into Fleet Automation because we face many problems with things such as the Ansible role to install Datadog in non-containerized hosts. We mainly want to see performance improvements, less time spent looking at costs, the ability to trust that costs will stay reasonable, and an easier way to manage our agents. It is such a powerful tool with much potential on the horizon, but cost control, performance, and agent management need improvement. The main issues are with the administrative side rather than the actual application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support and documentation are quite good."

"The documentation and the technical support are both quite good."

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

"It lets us react more quickly to things going wrong, so whereas before it might have been 30 minutes to an hour before we noticed something going on, we will know within a minute or two if something is off, which lets us get something back up and running faster for our customers, which is revenue."

"Its integration definitely stands out, providing seamless monitoring of all our systems, services, apps, and whatever else we secure and monitor, while visualizations have become simpler with dashboards and we are getting visibility into systems, services, and apps stack through a single pane of glass, which is good."

"Datadog has proven to be easy to set up and legible for both development and operational teams."

"The feature I have found to be the most valuable is the filtering feature in logs."

"The RUM solution has improved our ability to triage faster and hand more capabilities to our customer support."

"When I reflect on the ways we used to track down issues, I can't imagine how we ever managed before Datadog."

"Profiling has been made easier."

"The dashboards and the performance of the software have been great."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

"There is still a lot of improvement that is needed in terms of stability. We figured out that it was not able to monitor or offer some forms of self-service capabilities."

"We would like to see smaller or shorter tutorials and video sessions."

"I found the documentation can sometimes be confusing."

"Graph filters for logs need to be set manually which works well for JSON but not for unstructured logs."

"The application performance monitoring module had very few functionalities that we needed for the application health check."

"Datadog could have a better business analysis module."

"One area where I was really looking for improvement was the CSPM product line. I had really wanted to have team-level visibility for findings, since the team managing the resources has much more context and ability to resolve the issue, as the service owner. However, this has been added to the announcement in a recent keynote."

"A tool as powerful as Datadog is, understandably, going to have a bit of a learning curve, especially for new team members who are unfamiliar with the bevy of features it offers."

"Users need to be aware of licensing control. With autodiscovery, the product can begin to come at a high cost."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

"It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing."

"Licensing is based on the retention period of logs and metrics."

"Pricing is somewhat affordable compared to other solutions but in order to really lower the costs of other products you need to plan very carefully your resources usage, otherwise, it can get expensive real quick."

"This solution is budget friendly."

"I am not satisfied with its licensing. Its payment is based on the exported data, and there was an explosion of the data for three or four weeks. My customer was not alerted, and there was no way for them to see that there has been an explosion of data. They got a big invoice for one or two months. The pricing model of Datadog is based on the data. The customer was quite surprised about not being alerted about this explosion of data. They should provide some kind of alert when there is an increase in usage."

"At my last company, we did see ROI, specifically around response time. We could get to mission critical things that were down and losing revenue on immediately. So, the product paid itself back."

"Our licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis."

"If you do your homework, you'll find that if you're really concerned with cost, it's good."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	46
Large Enterprise	99

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...

What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

Zabbix vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Comparisons

Compared 47% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 30% of the time

Kloudfuse vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 23% of the time

More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Competitors

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 3% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Datadog

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download Datadog product report

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

No data available

Overview

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom

Datadog integrates extensive monitoring solutions with features like customizable dashboards and real-time alerting, supporting efficient system management. Its seamless integration capabilities with tools like AWS and Slack make it a critical part of cloud infrastructure monitoring.

Datadog offers centralized logging and monitoring, making troubleshooting fast and efficient. It facilitates performance tracking in cloud environments such as AWS and Azure, utilizing tools like EC2 and APM for service management. Custom metrics and alerts improve the ability to respond to issues swiftly, while real-time tools enhance system responsiveness. However, users express the need for improved query performance, a more intuitive UI, and increased integration capabilities. Concerns about the pricing model's complexity have led to calls for greater transparency and control, and additional advanced customization options are sought. Datadog's implementation requires attention to these aspects, with enhanced documentation and onboarding recommended to reduce the learning curve.

What are Datadog's Key Features?

Sharable Dashboards: Facilitate collaboration with customizable, intuitive dashboards.
Extensive Integrations: Seamlessly connects with tools like Slack and AWS to support workflows.
APM and RUM: Provides deep insights into application performance and user interactions.
Real-Time Tools: Enables agile responses to system issues with real-time monitoring.
Unified Tagging and Visualization: Eases management of complex systems with simplified visualization.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Look For?

Efficient Troubleshooting: Centralized logging speeds up the identification and resolution of issues.
Streamlined Workflows: Integrations with popular tools enhance operational efficiency.
Improved Observability: Comprehensive monitoring improves system reliability and performance.
Resource Optimization: Efficient microservices and container management leads to better cloud resource utilization.
Responsive Alerts: Customizable alerts ensure timely identification of critical issues.

In industries like finance and technology, Datadog is implemented for its monitoring capabilities across cloud architectures. Its ability to aggregate logs and provide a unified view enhances reliability in environments demanding high performance. By leveraging real-time insights and integration with platforms like AWS and Azure, organizations in these sectors efficiently manage their cloud infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance and proactive issue resolution.

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Datadog