Coralogix vs Devo comparison

Coralogix and Devo are both solutions in the Log Management category. Coralogix is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.2, while Devo is ranked #43. Coralogix holds a 0.9% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Devo’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Devo users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 11 Coralogix reviews

2,838 Views
1,164 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Devo

Read 22 Devo reviews

2,579 Views
1,470 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Devo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Coralogix and Devo offer robust solutions for log analytics and data observability. Devo seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and overall user satisfaction, despite Coralogix's affordability.

Features: Coralogix's users like its real-time analytics, indexing, and user-defined pipelines. Devo users favor its scalability, integrated threat hunting, and comprehensive data ingestion capabilities. Devo's broader feature set is preferred by users.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix faces criticism for occasional delays in log processing, a need for better visualization tools, and query performance. Devo users desire improvements in query performance, more intuitive documentation, and log processing speed. Both products have areas needing enhancement, but user reviews suggest Coralogix requires more immediate attention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix is praised for seamless deployment options and responsive customer support. Devo users express satisfaction with smooth deployment processes but indicate customer service response times could be improved. Coralogix holds an edge in customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix stands out for its cost-effective setup and strong ROI as stated by users. Devo's pricing is higher, but users believe the advanced features justify the cost and achieve significant ROI. Coralogix is more affordable, whereas Devo's higher price is validated by its feature-rich offering.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Devo Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Devo

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Log Management

21st

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (21st), API Management (15th), Streaming Analytics (14th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

43rd

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

36th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (11th), AIOps (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Devo is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Coralogix	0.9%
Devo	0.7%
Other	98.4%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Jorge Florez

Head SRE Latam at PayU

SaaS platform used by developers to store and conveniently search for logs

If a company has the budget and the log service is critical for them, I would say use Coralogix. It is a very good service for that. I would rate Coralogix an eight out of ten. It is an excellent service for storing logs for a long time. The capacity is unlimited for unindexed logs. The cost model is also very efficient because you pay for the ingested data per month. This can be compared to a solution like New Relic where you have to pay it upfront and cannot limit the data ingestion. Coralogix provides an easy way to search for logs and to visualize them. This a great feature because developers are constantly looking for or browsing logs.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Has cloud-first architecture with SIEM technology to run security operations

When it comes to scale, they're architected quite well. They handle some of the biggest customers globally, with significant throughput on their platform, managing thousands of customers. One of the most impressive aspects of Devo is its customer community. A large majority, over 80 percent of their customers, actively participate on a Devo-specific community page. They're contributing to product development and support, events, and user group information, helping each other out. This high level of engagement is rare and demonstrates both the loyalty of their customer base and the quality of their product. They offer a range of small, medium, and large options to cater to everyone. I sold Devo products while working with them, focusing on enterprise solutions. However, as a small reseller, my customers were typically smaller businesses. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"The overall stability and reliability of Coralogix are excellent, and I rarely encounter issues."

More Coralogix pros

"Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo."

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."

"The most powerful feature is the way the data is stored and extracted. The data is always stored in its original format and you can normalize the data after it has been stored."

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

"The most valuable feature is that it has native MSSP capabilities and maintains perfect data separation. It does all of that in a very easy-to-manage cloud-based solution."

"The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

"The strength of Devo is not only in that it is pretty intuitive, but it gives you the flexibility and creativity to merge feeds. The prime examples would be using the synthesis or union tables that give you phenomenal capabilities... The ability to use a synthesis or union table to combine all those feeds and make heads or tails of what's going on, and link it to go down a thread, is functionality that I hadn't seen before."

More Devo pros

Cons

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

"The features we were missing in the past were related to the way we see our metrics and aggregate our data."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

More Coralogix cons

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"There are some issues from an availability and functionality standpoint, meaning the tool is somewhat slow. There were some slow response periods over the past six to nine months, though it has yet to impact us terribly as we are a relatively small shop. We've noticed it, however, so Devo could improve the responsiveness."

"I would like to have the ability to create more complex dashboards."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"They can improve their AI capabilities"

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

More Devo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

Change might not be the correct word, but with every service, there is always room to improve. They are improving their services daily and deploy new features. When we had missing features that we ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

They can improve their AI capabilities. If you look at some integrations like XDR or AI, which add to the platform to correlate situations in events, there are areas for enhancement. For instance, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

Devo is a SIEM replacement technology used to run security operations. It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC. This system is the central cyber...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 23% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 9% of the time

Logz.io vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText AI Operations Management vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

October 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Devo

October 2025

Download Devo product report

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

Devo

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Devo

September 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Devo

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Devo and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Devo report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.