CMW Tracker vs WebRatio comparison

CMW Lab and WebRatio are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. CMW Lab is ranked #42, while WebRatio is ranked #56. CMW Lab holds a 0.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to WebRatio’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CMW Lab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of WebRatio users who would recommend it.

CMW Tracker

Read 15 CMW Tracker reviews

409 Views
323 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WebRatio

Read 2 WebRatio reviews

209 Views
207 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

CMW Tracker

WebRatio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2025

WebRatio and CMW Tracker are competitors in the software development platforms category. CMW Tracker generally has an advantage due to its comprehensive features, while WebRatio stands out for its cost-effectiveness and easy system integration.

Features: WebRatio is known for rapid application development, seamless integration options, and speed in deployment. This makes it suitable for projects demanding quick results. CMW Tracker offers extensive workflow automation, robust project management capabilities, and customization options, addressing more complex management needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WebRatio features a simple deployment process with accessible documentation, ensuring smooth integration and reliable support. CMW Tracker's deployment is more complex but offers a wide range of customer support options for comprehensive assistance, catering to larger projects.

Pricing and ROI: WebRatio is competitively priced, offering a good ROI for projects with shorter timelines through efficient resource usage. CMW Tracker comes at a higher price, justified by its advanced functionalities and long-term returns for complex project management needs. WebRatio is more budget-friendly, whereas CMW Tracker delivers higher ROI through its powerful features.

To learn more, read our detailed CMW Tracker vs. WebRatio Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CMW Tracker vs. WebRatio

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CMW Tracker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

42nd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (42nd)

WebRatio

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

56th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of CMW Tracker is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WebRatio is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CMW Tracker	0.4%
WebRatio	0.3%
Other	99.3%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Sarah Sheluchin

Works

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.

Read full review

reviewer1485573

IT Services Consultant at a consultancy with self employed

Little coding needed and speeds development time but lacks documentation

The maintenance aspect is too heavy. Moving from one version to the other made the solution change, and not in a way that we liked. Typically there are documents about the release of new versions and a set of activities required to migrate from one to the other. This time, it was very messy. There were issues surrounding the management of the release. This could potentially be due to the fact that WebRation, in the past, had started to make some choices regarding the framework and architecture that were changed later. In the past, we'd use a strategy as the environment, as an architectural pattern for the application. Now, it's moving more on the spring framework and this initiated some change that obviously had an impact on our application. It's caused a problem with maintenance. The solution seems to have changed its approach. Now, it's more related to a federative application environment in a monolithic aspect. While the solution was interesting at one point, everything is moving towards the cloud. WebRatio should be moving also in the web approach. Currently, you have to install an environment inside the desktop. The future is the cloud. Normally with a low code environment, there is a VPN notation - maybe a WebML or FML notation. If they can move in to have an environment that has a running machine at the end, it would be great. Obviously, some components on the server-side should be deliberate. Normally it's the model you control that's step-by-step and has a very simple flow. In the digital environment, in the organization, the process is more complex. The quality of the documentation and the community surrounding the product are poor. They need to give users more documentation and build up the surrounding community. As it isn't a well-known product, it's hard to find professionals to work with it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."

"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."

"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."

"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."

"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."

"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."

"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."

"Low code development."

More CMW Tracker pros

"The initial setup isn't too complex."

Cons

"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."

"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."

"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."

"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."

"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."

"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."

"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."

"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."

More CMW Tracker cons

"The maintenance aspect is too heavy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."

"Great value for the money."

"The price is so reasonable."

"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."

"This solution has a very lost cost."

"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Comparisons

No data available

Bonita vs WebRatio

Compared 100% of the time

More WebRatio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CMW Tracker

October 2025

Download CMW Tracker product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2025

Download WebRatio product report

Also Known As

Comindware Tracker

No data available

Overview

CMW Tracker offers a browser-accessible workflow management platform supporting low code development with features such as team collaboration and excellent customer service. Users value its affordability and ability to enhance transparency and standardize processes.

CMW Tracker streamlines project management by allowing non-technical users to create workflows, manage tasks, and synchronize tools efficiently. This platform emphasizes ease of deployment and modification, bringing transparency and clarity to processes while enabling workflow automation. Its user-friendly design, robust analytics, and cost-effectiveness make it a favored choice for organizations needing efficient workflow management.

What are the main features of CMW Tracker?

Easy Deployment and Modification: Quickly set up and customize according to user needs.
Browser Accessibility: Access from any location using any web browser.
Low Code Development: Empower users without technical expertise to create workflows.
Team Collaboration Tools: Facilitate seamless communication and collaboration among team members.
Robust Analytics and Reporting: Comprehensive analysis and reporting to track and optimize projects.
Mobile Accessibility: Manage time and tasks efficiently outside the office.

What benefits can users expect from CMW Tracker?

Improved Transparency: Increased visibility into project processes and status.
Standardized Processes: Better alignment and consistency in task management.
Cost-Effective Solution: Affordability without compromising on features and support.
Enhanced Ease of Use: User-friendly design reduces reliance on technical teams.

CMW Tracker is widely implemented across industries requiring efficient workflow management, particularly in settings where collaboration and process transparency are critical. Organizations benefit from its ability to standardize operations, reduce IT dependency, and enhance service delivery by enabling seamless communication among dispersed team members working on joint projects.

CMW Lab

In WebRatio we have been nurturing a true passion for developing enterprise-class software that exponentially increases the productivity and agility of our customers.

WebRatio

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services

Unicredit Leasing, Acer, Gruppo Torinese Transporti, A2A, SET Distribuzone, Dolomiti Energia, AIM Gruppo, IFC CNA_ Amsa

Buyer's Guide

CMW Tracker vs. WebRatio

September 2025

Free Report: CMW Tracker vs. WebRatio

Find out what your peers are saying about CMW Tracker vs. WebRatio and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CMW Tracker vs. WebRatio report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.