Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CMW Tracker vs TIBCO iProcess Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CMW Tracker
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
39th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (38th)
TIBCO iProcess Suite
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
40th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of CMW Tracker is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO iProcess Suite is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
CMW Tracker0.9%
TIBCO iProcess Suite0.8%
Other98.3%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.
SA
Senior Software Development Team Leader at sejel
An easy-to-use solution with great integration
It involves a lot of investment. The learning curve is not similar to other products, like K2. Regarding the user interface, I have to access workflows and define and manage the processes on the variant of a Windows application, which is not accessible if you don't have access from the client to install it on the workstation. And most of the solutions we're currently evaluating are web-based. Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing. It has lots of elements. It's not user-intuitive compared to other products. Other than that, the licensing model is our main concern.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Low code development."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"​It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files.​"
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
 

Cons

"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
"Great value for the money."
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"This solution has a very lost cost."
"The price is so reasonable."
"The price could definitely be lower."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
No data available
 

Also Known As

Comindware Tracker
iProcess Suite
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Delta Air Lines, Detroit Water and Sewerage, DVLA, E-Plus, FedEx, Geisinger Health System, ING Turkey, Kempen & Co., KPN, LCL, Merck, Merial
Find out what your peers are saying about CMW Tracker vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.