No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CMW Tracker vs Genpact Cora SeQuence comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CMW Tracker
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
31st
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (31st)
Genpact Cora SeQuence
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
34th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of CMW Tracker is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Genpact Cora SeQuence is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CMW Tracker1.5%
Genpact Cora SeQuence1.1%
Other97.4%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.
it_user1041942 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Good reporting, a very good dashboard, and easy to set up
We primarily use the solution for processes like preparing worksheets. It's essential to the human resource process like expenses and allowances The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good. The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"​It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files.​"
"Overall, this is an excellent workflow management tool."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."
"It helps very well with project management, and the workflow process is very easy and fast."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"I find the flexibility most valuable, and being able to connect and integrate with various systems, as well as being solution oriented, is valuable to me as well."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
 

Cons

"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"It lacks workflow samples, which would make it even easier for non-technical users to build their own apps."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The areas that would benefit in improvement would be the training information, the white papers and useful tutorials as to how to build these typical solutions."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
"Great value for the money."
"This solution has a very lost cost."
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
"The price is so reasonable."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
24%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
No data available
 

Also Known As

Comindware Tracker
Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM Suite
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
South West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTrade
Find out what your peers are saying about CMW Tracker vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.