No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler vs Veeam Data Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 1, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloud Security Connector fo...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Internet Security (11th)
Veeam Data Platform
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
431
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (1st), Cloud Backup (1st), Virtualization Management Tools (3rd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler and Veeam Data Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is designed for Internet Security and holds a mindshare of 0.6%.
Veeam Data Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Backup and Recovery, holds 6.6% mindshare, down 16.9% since last year.
Internet Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler0.6%
Cisco Umbrella30.0%
Zscaler Internet Access28.8%
Other40.599999999999994%
Internet Security
Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Veeam Data Platform6.6%
Commvault Cloud3.9%
Rubrik3.8%
Other85.7%
Backup and Recovery
 

Featured Reviews

Vibin Thomas - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead, Technical Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
Unified cloud policies have improved zero-trust controls and simplified workload monitoring
A challenge faced during the initial implementation involved routing and application dependency. After routing cloud workload traffic through Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, a few applications started failing because they depended on specific external services that were getting blocked due to strict policies or SSL inspection. To resolve this, traffic was analyzed using Zscaler logs, the exact domains and services being impacted were identified, and a controlled policy exception was created while maintaining overall security. This helped strike the right balance between security and application availability, which is very important in production environments. A key learning from this was that while Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler provides strong security control, proper policy tuning and understanding application behavior is critical for smooth deployment. Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler has had a very positive impact, especially in terms of security and operational efficiency. Before implementation, cloud workloads had direct internet access through the NAT gateway, which limited visibility and control over outbound traffic. After adopting Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, all traffic was routed through Zscaler, giving centralized visibility and full policy enforcement. One improvement observed was a significant increase in threat detection. The ability to identify and block suspicious outbound connections that were previously not visible improved the overall security posture. From an operational perspective, troubleshooting became much faster. Instead of checking multiple cloud logs, Zscaler logs could be directly used to analyze traffic behavior, which reduced incident resolution time. The dependency on traditional firewall appliances in cloud environments was reduced, which simplified the architecture and lowered operational overhead. Additionally, for compliance-driven clients in banking, it helped meet audit requirements by providing detailed logs and consistent policy enforcement across both users and workloads. Measurable improvements were observed after implementing Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler. In terms of visibility and threat detection, a 25 to 35 percent increase in identifying suspicious outbound connections was seen that were previously not visible when traffic was going through NAT. From an operational standpoint, troubleshooting time reduced by 45 to 55 percent because Zscaler logs could be directly analyzed instead of checking multiple cloud logs. Dependence on additional security appliances in the cloud was also reduced, which helped lower operational overhead and simplified the architecture. In terms of compliance, better audit readiness was achieved with centralized logging and consistent policy enforcement across workloads and users. While Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is a strong solution, one area that could be improved, especially for teams that are new, is configuring route tables, ensuring proper traffic flow, and avoiding asymmetric routing, which can be challenging, particularly in large or multi-VPC environments. More automated deployment options or guided configurations, especially for AWS or Azure, would simplify the onboarding process. Another area for improvement is better visibility at the cloud-native level, such as tighter integration with cloud logs or more context-aware insight for workload behavior, which would make troubleshooting even faster. Once properly implemented, it works efficiently and provides strong security and visibility. In addition to deployment simplicity, improvements around policy tuning and documentation would add significant value. From a policy perspective, when Zscaler policy is extended to cloud workloads, it sometimes requires careful fine-tuning to avoid impacting application dependency. More predefined templates or workload-specific policy recommendations would help teams implement it faster with fewer disruptions. In terms of documentation, while the existing guides are helpful, more step-by-step real-world deployment examples, especially for multi-VPC or hybrid environments, would make onboarding smoother for teams. Tighter integration guidance with cloud-native tools such as AWS logging or monitoring services would further improve troubleshooting and visibility. From a support standpoint, faster access to best practice recommendations or reference architecture would help teams avoid common misconfigurations during the initial setup.
TH
Applications section Head at Raya Integration
Continuous replication and backup simplify customer service across enterprises of any size
Veeam Data Platform provides me with the most useful features such as application restore, single file restore, backup and replication, and continuous replication. We utilize these features for management and the customers we serve. Veeam Data Platform provides features such as immutability and ransomware protection. While we use other applications for ransomware protection, we rely on Veeam Data Platform for encryption.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler has positively impacted my organization significantly, as we have consistent, enforced policies on all cloud traffic, reduced risk of data leakage, easier audits, and from an operational standpoint we have saved time not having to manage individual workload agents, which is a win both in security and efficiency."
"It is very useful ............visibility on the end-user,"
"The solution is secure."
"Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler has positively impacted our organization by helping us in our cloud environment to connect our resources to Zscaler, ensuring that security policies are consistent with zero-trust access and increasing reliability by 28%."
"Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler has had a very positive impact, especially in terms of security and operational efficiency."
"We had a vendor screw up a financial accounting program at tax season, a critical time for one of our customers, and we were able to roll the VM back in under five minutes, and users were back on the software in under 10 minutes from restore."
"Simplified management"
"It lets you verify a backup with the least amount of effort."
"Its portability and being able to back up between different platforms are the most valuable features."
"The technical support services have always been good."
"One of the best things about Veeam is that they have consistently improved on themselves since they started. Personally, I've been using Veeam since around 2013/2014 when it was only supporting certain hypervisors such as HyperV, and since then it has become truly mature enterprise-level software with a lot of versatility."
"We use it to back up and restore our virtual machine in a live environment without restoring the complete virtual machine, as it just mounts its storage to the NFS and makes the machine live in seconds, which is our favourite feature in Veeam ONE."
"Veeam ONE is the perfect solution for monitoring and managing your hypervisor infrastructure."
 

Cons

"I did not rate it higher simply because there is room for even more seamless cloud-native integration and a few user experience refinements."
"If there are any issues at the network level, such as users working from home, then it is very hard to catch up with them and resolve issues on the end-user machine."
"While Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is a strong solution, one area that could be improved, especially for teams that are new, is configuring route tables, ensuring proper traffic flow, and avoiding asymmetric routing, which can be challenging, particularly in large or multi-VPC environments."
"The connectivity could be faster."
"The pricing of the solution could be reduced."
"I would like for them to develop the ability to fix the way it does backups. We can't pick a backup for one database; we have to do a backup on the whole Exchange VM."
"I face difficulties when trying to deploy Veeam ONE because my active directory restricts some particular rights."
"We haven't had any issues at all with it other than the fact that there is a slight process to acquire additional licenses if we want to expand our number of hosts."
"The implementation of the features can be improved. Currently, there is no segregation of duty. Normally, any backup software or client service software is implemented in a way where one person is responsible for the implementation of the server, and one is responsible for the client, but Veeam Backup & Replication is not implemented in that way. Therefore, restores don't work like that. The backup guys have to do the restores, which is not a good thing. Its pricing should also be improved. It is quite expensive."
"Compared to IBM, Veeam Data Platform is simpler but brings some challenges with automation in backup and Oracle backup configuration."
"The cost of adding additional sockets. It was a lot more than just purchasing an additional agent like you would for Backup Exec or StorageCraft."
"I like the Acronis backup solutions on the block-based part of backups. That is a functionality that Veeam does not provide."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten."
"We pay yearly licensing fees for Veeam in our data centers where we're using disaster recovery and replication between our many solutions, especially cloud solutions. From the beginning, we've done our licensing from a separate channel through our data center team in Seattle."
"The price of the solution could be lower."
"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. The licensing costs are yearly."
"Its software solution has a fee."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"Its price is reasonable for a big company or a big client. It is not too much. It is cheaper than VMware."
"We have increased our scalability while being able to free up senior resources from recovery activities. I estimate our overall savings to about $20,000 per year."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Internet Security solutions are best for your needs.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user159711 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Nov 9, 2014
VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto
Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
22%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Insurance Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business218
Midsize Enterprise99
Large Enterprise139
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler?
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is definitely competitive. They provide us a good cost, and since we obtained it through AWS Marketpl...
What needs improvement with Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler?
I feel that they are doing great with Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler. If I need to suggest an improvement, it would be to simplify the steep learning curve, as it can be complex for newcomers...
What is your primary use case for Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler?
In our current organization, we have been using Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler by Maiden Edge, Maidenhead Bridge for almost two and a half years. They are providing us specialized virtual app...
Major Differences Between These 4 Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions?
Comparing the features of the four is not the right approach. You need to develop a list of requirements for backup and DR that are specific to your organization and then compare each of the four ...
How do the backup solutions of Veeam and Veritas compare?
Technically, Veeam is best for hyper-v & VMWare replications, snapshots, HA failover, also support for file system backups inside VMs., support for tape library & FC too. But Veritas Netbac...
How does Nakivo compare with Veeam Backup & Replication?
Nakivo is my favorite backup software. Below are the main benefits of Nakivo compared to Veeam 1. Low cost. 2. Backup storage with global deduplication (this is the main requirement of a backup sol...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Veeam Backup & Replication, Veeam ONE, Veeam Backup & Replication
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, iboss and others in Internet Security. Updated: February 2026.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.