Checkmarx One vs Rapid7 Metasploit comparison

Checkmarx and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Checkmarx is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.2, while Rapid7 is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0. Checkmarx holds a 1.3% mindshare in VM, compared to Rapid7’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

18,784 Views
1,691 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Rapid7 Metasploit

Read 22 Rapid7 Metasploit reviews

3,613 Views
3,107 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Rapid7 Metasploit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Rapid7 Metasploit and Checkmarx One compete in the cybersecurity domain. Rapid7 Metasploit has an upper hand in penetration testing due to its comprehensive tools, while Checkmarx One is advantageous in static application security testing because of its thorough code analysis.

Features: Rapid7 Metasploit is renowned for its comprehensive exploit testing, robust vulnerability validation, and extensive exploit development tools. Checkmarx One offers static application security testing, code analysis, and integration within the software development lifecycle.

Room for Improvement: Rapid7 Metasploit could enhance its static code analysis capability, provide more seamless integration within development environments, and improve long-term strategic security support. Checkmarx One could improve its ease of use in the initial deployment phase, reduce costs for smaller teams, and enhance real-time vulnerability validation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 Metasploit provides straightforward deployment beneficial for penetration testing teams with responsive support. Checkmarx One requires integrative deployment within development workflows and offers comprehensive onboarding support to overcome the learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: Rapid7 Metasploit is competitively priced, making it accessible for smaller teams with quick ROI through vulnerability assessments. Checkmarx One has higher initial costs due to its extensive feature set but delivers long-term ROI by improving code security and integration with development processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

5.6

Checkmarx One enhances security by automating vulnerability detection, reducing costs, and improving development efficiency through CI/CD integration.

Sentiment score

4.3

Rapid7 Metasploit efficiently identifies vulnerabilities and saves costs but is average for experienced users or those using Qualys/Nessus.

Overall, between the fast scanning, automation, automatic reporting, and easy detection, it has reduced manual effort enough that we did not need an extra reviewer, even as our codebase or team size grew.

Swetha Dhanasekar

Senior GenAI Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Based on my interactions with the clients, I can tell that there is a return on investment because if something is not profitable and it's not helping to save costs or vulnerabilities, clients wouldn't come back to renew their license year after year.

Gideon Anichi

Chief Technology Officer at 3CS Aquarah Limited

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

Metasploit has helped save time, especially with testing websites or VIPD projects.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

The ROI can be very rapid for organizations using vulnerability assessment for the first time.

Nuki Agustino Wono

Senior Security Consultant at ITSEC Asia

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.0

Checkmarx One support is praised for quick responses and knowledgeable staff, despite some reporting delays in technical support.

Sentiment score

5.9

Rapid7 Metasploit support has mixed reviews, with helpful resources but varying response times and effectiveness compared to Cisco.

If you raise a support case with Checkmarx, it is handled smoothly.

RiteshWalia

ML Engineer - Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The customer support team is amazing and they provide on-phone call, email support, and on-website support.

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

I have relied on Checkmarx One customer support hundreds of times for several things, and Checkmarx One support is very proactive and very responsive.

Gideon Anichi

Chief Technology Officer at 3CS Aquarah Limited

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

Rapid7 sometimes struggles with queries from non-security people, whereas Tenable is more patient.

Nuki Agustino Wono

Senior Security Consultant at ITSEC Asia

The customer support is excellent

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

Checkmarx One is scalable for large workloads, but some users report challenges with configurations and licensing requirements.

Sentiment score

5.1

Rapid7 Metasploit's scalability opinions vary, some see limitations, others appreciate flexibility; performance varies by project and infrastructure.

Approximately four billion lines of code are being scanned monthly.

Ricardo Sousa da Silva

Cyber Security Expert at Nestle

Since it is cloud-based, the infrastructure and PaaS, IaaS, and SaaS are taken care of by the cloud marketplace.

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Checkmarx One's scalability has changed my organization because the strong collaboration between the development and security team helps us to do things much faster.

Swetha Dhanasekar

Senior GenAI Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

Metasploit can handle big projects and is already prepared for them.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

Rapid7 Metasploit is highly scalable.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Rapid7 Metasploit has limited scalability based on my experience, as the customer receives the full functionality of the product with the license.

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.3

Checkmarx One is generally stable but faces issues with large codebases, memory use, and session inconsistencies.

Sentiment score

7.8

Rapid7 Metasploit's stability is highly praised, with recent versions improving and rated 8-9/10, despite occasional network issues.

I would rate the stability of this solution a nine on a scale of 1 to 10 where one is low stability and 10 is high.

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

Checkmarx One is often down when the cloud provider experiences issues.

Ricardo Sousa da Silva

Cyber Security Expert at Nestle

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

I have never faced any technical issues or downtimes.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

I find Metasploit to be very stable, and I would rate its stability as a nine out of ten.

Nuki Agustino Wono

Senior Security Consultant at ITSEC Asia

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Room For Improvement

Checkmarx One needs enhancements in accuracy, speed, integration, UI, support, pricing, and features for enterprise usability.

Rapid7 Metasploit needs faster updates, improved tools integration, better UI, enhanced features, and updated evasion capabilities for modern defenses.

Integration into the IDE being used would be beneficial so that code does not need to be uploaded to the website and an IDE-friendly report could be generated.

reviewer2783283

Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from.

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

If you can improve the speed optimization, it takes around 30 to 40 minutes for checking a build. If you can make it within five minutes or 10 minutes, that would be great.

Rohit Kaushish

Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

While you can check the vulnerability, and the system will tell you there is no vulnerability, usually, a human can change one, two, or three parameters and using the same technique and the same scripts can break the system.

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

The database is not always updated with the latest vulnerabilities or zero-day exploits.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

The time taken to fetch reports based on the number of events can be extensive.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Setup Cost

Checkmarx One is often costly but provides quality and security, with costs varying by team size and selected modules.

Rapid7 Metasploit's pricing ranges from free to $20,000, with varied opinions on its affordability compared to competitors.

For a small team under 50 developers, normal expenses come under 30 to 60K.

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Due to the number of years I've implemented Checkmarx One, there are rebates and discounts from the OEM which makes it a lot more profitable.

Gideon Anichi

Chief Technology Officer at 3CS Aquarah Limited

The pricing should be reasonable, matching what we are paying for.

Swetha Dhanasekar

Senior GenAI Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

The cost is approximately $15 per device.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Metasploit is cheaper than Nessus and offers a more robust community edition that provides a good experience for studying Metasploit.

Nuki Agustino Wono

Senior Security Consultant at ITSEC Asia

After that, they usually purchase the commercial part of the solution due to its deep integration with InsightVM.

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Valuable Features

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive vulnerability scanning, seamless CI/CD integration, and enhances productivity with ease of use and automation.

Rapid7 Metasploit excels in penetration testing with strong integration, comprehensive features, and efficient management in a unified platform.

Since replacing the previous tool, SAST and SCA scans are conducted in a couple of minutes instead of hours or days.

Ricardo Sousa da Silva

Cyber Security Expert at Nestle

The best features Checkmarx One offers, over the past years, include broad language and technical support that Checkmarx provides, covering most languages.

RiteshWalia

ML Engineer - Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Checkmarx One has positively impacted our organization as we tend to find vulnerabilities very early in the development cycle.

Adarkum Kumar

Product security engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

Rapid7 offers comprehensive features within one platform, eliminating the need to integrate multiple tools to see all alerts in one place.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

InsightVM searches for potential threats and vulnerabilities of the infrastructure, and after that, Rapid7 Metasploit validates whether we can break the system using this vulnerability or threat, serving as a validator component of the InsightVM solution.

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

The most valuable features of Metasploit include its powerful capabilities for exploitation and scanning.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Container Security (16th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (2nd)

Rapid7 Metasploit

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 Metasploit is 1.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	1.3%
Rapid7 Metasploit	1.7%
Other	97.0%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Extensive exploit database and seamless integration enhance penetration testing capabilities

The automated approach in the audits or in the hacking testing with Rapid7 Metasploit could be improved because even the same attack you provide today will go in different ways another day. I prefer when the auditor or pen-tester provides the attack in a non-automated mode. For some, it might be a valuable option, but I'm not sure it's valuable for us, as after the attack has been provided, we should release a report detailing how it transpired and what the customer should improve to block this way of attack. If the attack was provided in an automated mode, you cannot receive sufficient information that helps with this final report for the customer. While you can check the vulnerability, and the system will tell you there is no vulnerability, usually, a human can change one, two, or three parameters and using the same technique and the same scripts can break the system. Rapid7 Metasploit could be improved in areas concerning the experience with finding particular scripts pre-installed in the solution. Customers, administrators, and pen-testers spend considerable time trying to locate the specific component they need by the name of the technique or the name of the attack, so any improvements in making it easier to find those predefined components by name or timeframe would be beneficial. Search filters could be a correct improvement.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmarx?

One way Checkmarx One could be improved is if it could automatically run scans every month after implementation. If it is possible to set it in the SAST portal to scan the repositories automaticall...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 Metasploit?

I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 Metasploit?

The pricing of Rapid7 Metasploit is quite affordable. It has a free version that many customers start with, and after that, they usually purchase the commercial part of the solution due to its deep...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 Metasploit?

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 43% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 6% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 5% of the time

More Rapid7 Metasploit Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

March 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 Metasploit

March 2026

Download Rapid7 Metasploit product report

Also Known As

No data available

Metasploit

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Attackers are always developing new exploits and attack methods—Metasploit penetration testing software helps you use their own weapons against them. Utilizing an ever-growing database of exploits, you can safely simulate real-world attacks on your network to train your security team to spot and stop the real thing.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

City of Corpus Christi, Diebold, Lumenate, Nebraska Public Power District, Prairie North Regional Health, Apptio, Automation Direct, Bob's Stores, Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, Carnegie Mellon University

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

March 2026

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Rapid7 Metasploit and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Rapid7 Metasploit report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.