No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo

Top 10 Rapid7 Metasploit Alternatives

Vendor: Rapid7
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Rapid7 Metasploit Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Rapid7 Metasploit based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Qualys VMDR, and NinjaOne. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Rapid7 Metasploit surpasses its competitors by offering a comprehensive suite of penetration testing tools, advanced automation capabilities, and a robust database of exploits, empowering security professionals to efficiently uncover and remediate vulnerabilities in complex networks.

Rapid7 Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Rapid7, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
4.4 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit offers efficient penetration testing and vulnerability scanning, appealing to security teams with its cost-effectiveness. In comparison, SentinelOne delivers AI-driven endpoint protection and real-time threat detection, catering to organizations seeking extensive features and improved ROI despite higher setup costs.
Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report
Rapid7 Metasploit has a lower setup cost compared to SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, which may appeal to budget-conscious users seeking cost efficiency. In contrast, SentinelOne offers more robust initial features justifying its higher setup price.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit has a lower setup cost compared to SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, which may appeal to budget-conscious users seeking cost efficiency. In contrast, SentinelOne offers more robust initial features justifying its higher setup price.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
Qualys VMDR is ideal for comprehensive cloud integration and policy compliance. In comparison, Rapid7 Metasploit excels in penetration testing with its extensive exploit library. Tech buyers might choose Qualys for seamless infrastructure integration or Metasploit for advanced testing capabilities.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Qualys VMDR has a straightforward setup process, while Rapid7 Metasploit involves more complex initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has a straightforward setup process, while Rapid7 Metasploit involves more complex initial configuration.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5

NinjaOne facilitates efficient monitoring and management of servers, workstations, and client networks. It excels in patch management, software deployment, and remote access, supporting small to medium businesses in cloud transitions. Users value its user-friendly interface, robust integration capabilities, and comprehensive automation, seeking improved third-party integrations and a more engaging graphical interface.

Download NinjaOne vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
We got a pretty good deal. It was fairly affordable.
Its pricing is great.
View comparison
Pricing
We got a pretty good deal. It was fairly affordable.
Its pricing is great.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit offers unmatched penetration testing capabilities with a vast exploit database, ideal for security testing. In comparison, Tenable Nessus excels in vulnerability assessment with ease of use and detailed reporting, making it suitable for efficient vulnerability management.
Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. Tenable Nessus Report
Rapid7 Metasploit offers a straightforward setup cost, while Tenable Nessus provides a variable setup cost depending on features and package chosen.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit offers a straightforward setup cost, while Tenable Nessus provides a variable setup cost depending on features and package chosen.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Tenable Security Center
4.1 out of 5
Tenable Security Center excels in vulnerability scanning and asset management leveraging Nessus, ideal for detailed dashboards. In comparison, Rapid7 Metasploit focuses on penetration testing, offering automation and cross-platform support. Each suits distinct security needs, influencing tech buyers based on priorities and infrastructure.
Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. Tenable Security Center Report
Tenable Security Center setup costs are higher with a more comprehensive initial investment, while Rapid7 Metasploit offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Security Center setup costs are higher with a more comprehensive initial investment, while Rapid7 Metasploit offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront costs.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
Acunetix scans web applications to identify vulnerabilities like SQL injections and cross-site scripting. Organizations use it for dynamic code testing and security assessments, benefiting from automated detection and detailed reporting. Enhancements are needed in API penetration testing, flexible scans, and integrations. Users appreciate its intuitive interface and centralized dashboard.
Download Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special.
The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000.
View comparison
Pricing
Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special.
The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management
4.1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit attracts tech buyers with its flexible penetration testing and affordable pricing. In comparison, Tenable Vulnerability Management appeals to those seeking comprehensive risk assessment and advanced analytics, despite higher costs, due to its streamlined deployment and long-term security benefits.
Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report
Rapid7 Metasploit often incurs higher setup costs, while Tenable Vulnerability Management offers more budget-friendly options. This pricing distinction highlights the difference in initial financial commitment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit often incurs higher setup costs, while Tenable Vulnerability Management offers more budget-friendly options. This pricing distinction highlights the difference in initial financial commitment between the two solutions.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit is ideal for focused penetration testing with advanced tools and lower setup costs. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP suits those needing comprehensive cloud security with cloud-native deployment and real-time threat intelligence, justified by higher investment for broader protection.
Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit features a moderate setup cost, contrasting with Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP, which entails a more significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit features a moderate setup cost, contrasting with Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP, which entails a more significant initial investment.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
FortiCNAPP
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
FortiCNAPP
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit excels in penetration testing with extensive automation and collaboration, appealing to buyers seeking an exploit database and open-source benefits. In comparison, FortiCNAPP's advanced features in threat detection and compliance lure buyers interested in robust network segmentation and security automation.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit offers a straightforward setup with competitive pricing designed for flexibility, while FortiCNAPP may have a higher initial setup cost but provides comprehensive cloud application protection features targeting larger organizations needing robust security.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit offers a straightforward setup with competitive pricing designed for flexibility, while FortiCNAPP may have a higher initial setup cost but provides comprehensive cloud application protection features targeting larger organizations needing robust security.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management
4.5 out of 5
Metasploit focuses on penetration testing, offering open-source features like extensive exploit databases. In comparison, Qualys offers comprehensive asset tracking, integration capabilities, and automated vulnerability discovery. Tech buyers choose Metasploit for cost-effective testing, while others opt for Qualys for detailed asset visibility.
Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit generally has a lower setup cost than Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit generally has a lower setup cost than Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
4.1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit is ideal for environments needing advanced penetration testing and exploit development with significant ROI. In comparison, Microsoft Defender offers real-time threat intelligence and seamless integration, benefiting those seeking comprehensive security within Microsoft ecosystems, emphasizing integration and seamless real-time capabilities over hands-on testing.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai
4.4 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit features an extensive exploit database, open-source nature, and diverse interfaces, appealing to tech buyers seeking robust penetration testing tools. In comparison, NodeZero Platform excels in cloud deployment and AI-driven vulnerability identification, achieving cost-effective solutions for buyers focused on real-time security validation.
Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai Report
Rapid7 Metasploit involves moderate setup costs, while The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai offers a more budget-friendly solution with lower setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit involves moderate setup costs, while The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai offers a more budget-friendly solution with lower setup expenses.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Qualys TotalCloud
4.3 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Qualys TotalCloud
4.3 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit excels in identifying vulnerabilities with robust penetration testing features, ideal for immediate value. In comparison, Qualys TotalCloud offers comprehensive cloud security solutions suited for businesses prioritizing cloud integration and long-term ROI despite higher costs with extensive features and compliance management.
Download Qualys TotalCloud vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit setup is cost-effective, while Qualys TotalCloud requires a higher initial investment. Qualys provides advanced features catering to extensive cloud needs, contrasting Metasploit's straightforward setup focused on penetration testing tools.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit setup is cost-effective, while Qualys TotalCloud requires a higher initial investment. Qualys provides advanced features catering to extensive cloud needs, contrasting Metasploit's straightforward setup focused on penetration testing tools.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit targets on-premise penetration testing with extensive exploit libraries, suitable for complex testing needs. In comparison, Amazon Inspector focuses on cloud environments, integrating seamlessly with AWS for scalable security assessments, and offers a cost-effective pricing model aligned with cloud usage, benefiting tech buyers prioritizing AWS integration.
Download Amazon Inspector vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit shows cost-effectiveness in setup expenses, contrasting with Amazon Inspector's higher initial setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit shows cost-effectiveness in setup expenses, contrasting with Amazon Inspector's higher initial setup costs.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Skybox Security Suite
3.8 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit's customization and cost-effective nature appeal to organizations seeking penetration testing solutions. In comparison, Skybox Security Suite's robust vulnerability management and scalability cater to large enterprises. Rapid7 offers open-source resources, while Skybox provides extensive integration and strong network security features.
Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. Skybox Security Suite Report
Rapid7 Metasploit offers competitive setup costs, while Skybox Security Suite requires a larger initial investment. Rapid7's affordability contrasts with Skybox's comprehensive feature set which demands higher initial expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit offers competitive setup costs, while Skybox Security Suite requires a larger initial investment. Rapid7's affordability contrasts with Skybox's comprehensive feature set which demands higher initial expenditure.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit is ideal for environments focused on penetration testing and advanced security assessments. In comparison, Automox appeals to those seeking efficient endpoint management and automation. Rapid7 demands complex deployment, whereas Automox simplifies with cloud-based setup, appealing to diverse organizational needs.
Download Automox vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit typically involves higher setup costs, while Automox offers a more affordable initiation, highlighting a clear distinction in initial expenses between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit typically involves higher setup costs, while Automox offers a more affordable initiation, highlighting a clear distinction in initial expenses between the two cybersecurity solutions.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Alert Logic MDR
4.0 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Alert Logic MDR
4.0 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit offers advanced penetration testing and flexibility through its open-source nature, ideal for detailed exploit analysis and hybrid cloud integration. In comparison, Alert Logic MDR excels in threat detection with global SOCs and comprehensive dashboards, benefiting large organizations with its adaptable cloud deployment.
Download Alert Logic MDR vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit has a lower initial setup cost compared to Alert Logic MDR. However, Alert Logic MDR offers a more comprehensive managed service with additional features.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit has a lower initial setup cost compared to Alert Logic MDR. However, Alert Logic MDR offers a more comprehensive managed service with additional features.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Cybersixgill
4.3 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Cybersixgill
4.3 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit offers robust penetration testing tools ideal for vulnerability management. In comparison, Cybersixgill excels with real-time threat intelligence, perfect for proactive threat detection. Metasploit's hands-on deployment contrasts with Cybersixgill's scalable cloud model, appealing based on user needs.
Download Cybersixgill vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit involves a complex setup cost, whereas Cybersixgill requires a more straightforward setup, highlighting notable differences in ease of initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit involves a complex setup cost, whereas Cybersixgill requires a more straightforward setup, highlighting notable differences in ease of initial investment.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Nucleus Security
3.8 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Nucleus Security
3.8 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit is ideal for penetration testing with its robust exploit database and integration abilities. In comparison, Nucleus Security excels in vulnerability management through automation and risk-based insights, making it suitable for comprehensive threat management despite its higher initial cost.
Download Nucleus Security vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit's setup cost involves a competitive fee, whereas Nucleus Security requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a clear difference in startup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit's setup cost involves a competitive fee, whereas Nucleus Security requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a clear difference in startup expenses.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
4.0 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit is favored for its flexible pricing and community support; in comparison, PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition provides advanced web testing features. Rapid7 offers efficient deployment, while PortSwigger's detailed analysis appeals to organizations prioritizing web security, justifying its higher cost.
Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit offers lower setup costs compared to PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for users prioritizing cost efficiency. PortSwigger's higher setup costs may reflect its extensive feature set designed for comprehensive security...
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit offers lower setup costs compared to PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for users prioritizing cost efficiency. PortSwigger's higher setup costs may reflect its extensive feature set designed for comprehensive security...
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk
4.3 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit excels in comprehensive penetration testing features and affordability. In comparison, Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers extensive threat intelligence and continuous monitoring, appealing to organizations seeking a broader security solution. Metasploit's cost-effectiveness contrasts with Arctic Wolf's strategic and managed service approach.
Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit has a significantly lower setup cost than Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, highlighting a key financial difference between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit has a significantly lower setup cost than Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, highlighting a key financial difference between the two cybersecurity solutions.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Intruder
1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Intruder
1 out of 5

Intruder is known for its vulnerability scanning and continuous monitoring features. It is valued for ease of integration and detailed reporting. Some users suggest improvements for customization options and expanded scanning capabilities. Intruder serves as a useful tool for security management and is appreciated by IT professionals.

View comparison
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
4.7 out of 5
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus offers robust vulnerability scanning and patch management capabilities. It excels in identifying threats and providing detailed reports. Areas for improvement include integration options and user experience optimization. Its features cater to organizations seeking comprehensive security management tools.
Download ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
The price is very reasonable.
View comparison
Pricing
The price is very reasonable.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
BMC Helix Automation Console
3.8 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit excels in vulnerability assessment and is cost-effective with straightforward deployment. In comparison, BMC Helix Automation Console focuses on IT task automation, offering strategic enterprise solutions with robust customer support, ideal for organizations seeking comprehensive IT management and automation efficiency.
Download BMC Helix Automation Console vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit requires an upfront setup cost, whereas BMC Helix Automation Console offers a more streamlined deployment with no initial fee, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between them.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit requires an upfront setup cost, whereas BMC Helix Automation Console offers a more streamlined deployment with no initial fee, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between them.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Greenbone
1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Greenbone
1 out of 5
Greenbone provides vulnerability assessment and management for IT networks. It offers valuable features like comprehensive scanning capabilities and detailed reporting. Some users mention room for improvement in customer support response times and ease of integration with other systems.
View comparison
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Cyberwatch Vulnerability Manager
1 out of 5
Cyberwatch Vulnerability Manager efficiently identifies and mitigates potential security threats with precise scanning capabilities and real-time updates. It offers insightful reporting and smooth integration but has room for improvement in customization options and advanced analytics functions to better meet diverse user requirements.
View comparison
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Titania Nipper
1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Titania Nipper
1 out of 5
Titania Nipper aids in identifying security vulnerabilities and configuration errors. It features robust reporting tools and compliance checks. While it excels in detailed analysis, there's room for improvement in scalability and integration with other systems.
View comparison
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Nodeware
1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Nodeware
1 out of 5
Nodeware aids network visibility and security through lightweight scanning. Users highlight its ease of use and effective vulnerability detection. While it provides valuable insights for IT management, some users suggest enhancements in integration capabilities and reporting features to better fit diverse network environments.
View comparison
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Enginsight
1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Enginsight
1 out of 5
Enginsight assists in cybersecurity and performance monitoring with features like real-time alerts, vulnerability scanning, and automated reports. Its intuitive dashboard facilitates ease of use. Users point out that integration with other tools could be improved to enhance functionality and adaptability.
View comparison
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Havoc Shield
1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Havoc Shield
1 out of 5
Havoc Shield enhances cybersecurity through features like real-time threat detection and comprehensive protection. It supports small businesses with intuitive setup but could improve its scalability for larger companies, offering better integration options and expanded alert customization to meet diverse business requirements.
View comparison

Related categories

Vulnerability Management
Cloud and Data Center Security
Container Security