Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo

Top 10 Rapid7 Metasploit Alternatives

Vendor: Rapid7
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Rapid7 Metasploit Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Rapid7 Metasploit based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Qualys VMDR, and Tenable Nessus. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Rapid7 Metasploit surpasses its competitors by offering a comprehensive suite of penetration testing tools, advanced automation capabilities, and a robust database of exploits, empowering security professionals to efficiently uncover and remediate vulnerabilities in complex networks.

Rapid7 Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Rapid7, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
4.3 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit offers efficient penetration testing and vulnerability scanning, appealing to security teams with its cost-effectiveness. In comparison, SentinelOne delivers AI-driven endpoint protection and real-time threat detection, catering to organizations seeking extensive features and improved ROI despite higher setup costs.
Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report
Rapid7 Metasploit has a lower setup cost compared to SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, which may appeal to budget-conscious users seeking cost efficiency. In contrast, SentinelOne offers more robust initial features justifying its higher setup price.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit has a lower setup cost compared to SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, which may appeal to budget-conscious users seeking cost efficiency. In contrast, SentinelOne offers more robust initial features justifying its higher setup price.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in automated remediation, offering comprehensive reports for security management. In comparison, Rapid7 Metasploit is ideal for penetration testing, providing effective exploitation tools. A tech buyer might choose Qualys for thorough asset views and Rapid7 for hands-on testing capabilities.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Qualys VMDR has a straightforward setup cost, while Rapid7 Metasploit offers more flexibility in pricing options. The significant difference lies in the setup complexity and initial expenditure between these two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has a straightforward setup cost, while Rapid7 Metasploit offers more flexibility in pricing options. The significant difference lies in the setup complexity and initial expenditure between these two security solutions.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit offers unmatched penetration testing capabilities with a vast exploit database, ideal for security testing. In comparison, Tenable Nessus excels in vulnerability assessment with ease of use and detailed reporting, making it suitable for efficient vulnerability management.
Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. Tenable Nessus Report
Rapid7 Metasploit offers a straightforward setup cost, while Tenable Nessus provides a variable setup cost depending on features and package chosen.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit offers a straightforward setup cost, while Tenable Nessus provides a variable setup cost depending on features and package chosen.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Tenable Security Center
4.1 out of 5
Tenable Security Center excels in vulnerability scanning and asset management leveraging Nessus, ideal for detailed dashboards. In comparison, Rapid7 Metasploit focuses on penetration testing, offering automation and cross-platform support. Each suits distinct security needs, influencing tech buyers based on priorities and infrastructure.
Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. Tenable Security Center Report
Tenable Security Center setup costs are higher with a more comprehensive initial investment, while Rapid7 Metasploit offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Security Center setup costs are higher with a more comprehensive initial investment, while Rapid7 Metasploit offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront costs.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management
4.0 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit attracts tech buyers with its flexible penetration testing and affordable pricing. In comparison, Tenable Vulnerability Management appeals to those seeking comprehensive risk assessment and advanced analytics, despite higher costs, due to its streamlined deployment and long-term security benefits.
Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report
Rapid7 Metasploit often incurs higher setup costs, while Tenable Vulnerability Management offers more budget-friendly options. This pricing distinction highlights the difference in initial financial commitment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit often incurs higher setup costs, while Tenable Vulnerability Management offers more budget-friendly options. This pricing distinction highlights the difference in initial financial commitment between the two solutions.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Download Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special.
The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000.
View comparison
Pricing
Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special.
The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit is ideal for focused penetration testing with advanced tools and lower setup costs. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP suits those needing comprehensive cloud security with cloud-native deployment and real-time threat intelligence, justified by higher investment for broader protection.
Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit features a moderate setup cost, contrasting with Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP, which entails a more significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit features a moderate setup cost, contrasting with Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP, which entails a more significant initial investment.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
4.0 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit is ideal for environments needing advanced penetration testing and exploit development with significant ROI. In comparison, Microsoft Defender offers real-time threat intelligence and seamless integration, benefiting those seeking comprehensive security within Microsoft ecosystems, emphasizing integration and seamless real-time capabilities over hands-on testing.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai
4.5 out of 5
Metasploit offers extensive integration options and numerous exploitation modules. In comparison, NodeZero excels with autonomous operations and AI-driven penetration testing. Tech buyers may choose Metasploit for its diverse toolset, while NodeZero appeals with cloud-based automatic updates and straightforward, AI-driven features.
Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai Report
Rapid7 Metasploit features competitive setup costs, while The NodeZero Platform presents an alternative with potentially more efficient onboarding pricing. The cost differences highlight distinct approaches to initial investment in security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit features competitive setup costs, while The NodeZero Platform presents an alternative with potentially more efficient onboarding pricing. The cost differences highlight distinct approaches to initial investment in security solutions.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management
4.5 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit excels with extensive exploit capabilities and automation tools, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers detailed risk identification and asset management. In comparison, Rapid7 appeals for budget-conscious users, whereas Qualys suits organizations seeking comprehensive cybersecurity features and broader enterprise integration.
Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit is notable for its lower setup costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management typically involves higher expenses, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit is notable for its lower setup costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management typically involves higher expenses, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit targets on-premise penetration testing with extensive exploit libraries, suitable for complex testing needs. In comparison, Amazon Inspector focuses on cloud environments, integrating seamlessly with AWS for scalable security assessments, and offers a cost-effective pricing model aligned with cloud usage, benefiting tech buyers prioritizing AWS integration.
Download Amazon Inspector vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit shows cost-effectiveness in setup expenses, contrasting with Amazon Inspector's higher initial setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit shows cost-effectiveness in setup expenses, contrasting with Amazon Inspector's higher initial setup costs.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
4.0 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit is favored for its flexible pricing and community support; in comparison, PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition provides advanced web testing features. Rapid7 offers efficient deployment, while PortSwigger's detailed analysis appeals to organizations prioritizing web security, justifying its higher cost.
Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit offers lower setup costs compared to PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for users prioritizing cost efficiency. PortSwigger's higher setup costs may reflect its extensive feature set designed for comprehensive security...
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit offers lower setup costs compared to PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for users prioritizing cost efficiency. PortSwigger's higher setup costs may reflect its extensive feature set designed for comprehensive security...
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Nucleus
1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Nucleus
1 out of 5
Nucleus streamlines workflow management through centralized data access, enabling easy collaboration and decision-making. It offers robust integration capabilities, enhancing efficiency. Users appreciate its reliable performance but suggest improvements in customer support responsiveness for an even smoother experience.
View comparison
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk
4.3 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit excels in comprehensive penetration testing features and affordability. In comparison, Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers extensive threat intelligence and continuous monitoring, appealing to organizations seeking a broader security solution. Metasploit's cost-effectiveness contrasts with Arctic Wolf's strategic and managed service approach.
Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit has a significantly lower setup cost than Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, highlighting a key financial difference between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit has a significantly lower setup cost than Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, highlighting a key financial difference between the two cybersecurity solutions.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Cybersixgill
4.4 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Cybersixgill
4.4 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit offers robust penetration testing tools ideal for vulnerability management. In comparison, Cybersixgill excels with real-time threat intelligence, perfect for proactive threat detection. Metasploit's hands-on deployment contrasts with Cybersixgill's scalable cloud model, appealing based on user needs.
Download Cybersixgill vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit involves a complex setup cost, whereas Cybersixgill requires a more straightforward setup, highlighting notable differences in ease of initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit involves a complex setup cost, whereas Cybersixgill requires a more straightforward setup, highlighting notable differences in ease of initial investment.
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Greenbone
1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Greenbone
1 out of 5
Greenbone provides vulnerability assessment and management for IT networks. It offers valuable features like comprehensive scanning capabilities and detailed reporting. Some users mention room for improvement in customer support response times and ease of integration with other systems.
View comparison
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Intruder
1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Intruder
1 out of 5

Intruder is known for its vulnerability scanning and continuous monitoring features. It is valued for ease of integration and detailed reporting. Some users suggest improvements for customization options and expanded scanning capabilities. Intruder serves as a useful tool for security management and is appreciated by IT professionals.

View comparison
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Cyberwatch Vulnerability Manager
1 out of 5
Cyberwatch Vulnerability Manager efficiently identifies and mitigates potential security threats with precise scanning capabilities and real-time updates. It offers insightful reporting and smooth integration but has room for improvement in customization options and advanced analytics functions to better meet diverse user requirements.
View comparison
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Nodeware
1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Nodeware
1 out of 5
Nodeware aids network visibility and security through lightweight scanning. Users highlight its ease of use and effective vulnerability detection. While it provides valuable insights for IT management, some users suggest enhancements in integration capabilities and reporting features to better fit diverse network environments.
View comparison
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Enginsight
1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Enginsight
1 out of 5
Enginsight assists in cybersecurity and performance monitoring with features like real-time alerts, vulnerability scanning, and automated reports. Its intuitive dashboard facilitates ease of use. Users point out that integration with other tools could be improved to enhance functionality and adaptability.
View comparison
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Havoc Shield
1 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit Logo
Havoc Shield
1 out of 5
Havoc Shield enhances cybersecurity through features like real-time threat detection and comprehensive protection. It supports small businesses with intuitive setup but could improve its scalability for larger companies, offering better integration options and expanded alert customization to meet diverse business requirements.
View comparison

Related categories

Vulnerability Management
Cloud and Data Center Security
Container Security